Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 3/2022

11-01-2022 | Care | Original Article

Impact of enhanced pathway of care in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Authors: Michela Tiberi, Marco Andolfi, Michele Salati, Alberto Roncon, Gian Marco Guiducci, Stefano Falcetta, Lorenzo Ambrosi, Majed Refai

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (E.R.A.S.) is a multimodal, evidence-based and patient-centered pathway designed to minimize surgical stress, enhancing recovery and improving perioperative outcomes. However, considering that the potential clinical implication of E.R.A.S. on patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (V.A.T.S.) has not properly defined, we proposed to implement our minimally invasive program with a specific clinical pathway able to enhance recovery after lung resection. Aim of this study was to assess the impact of this integrated program of Enhanced Pathway of Care (E.P.C.) in Uniportal V.A.T.S. patients undergoing lung resection, in terms of efficiency and safety. We conducted a retrospective, observational study enrolling patients undergoing uniportal V.A.T.S. resections from January 2015 to May 2020. Two groups were created: pre-E.P.C. and E.P.C. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to evaluate length of stay (LOS), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and readmission rate (READM). We analyzed 1167 patients (E.P.C. group: 182; pre-E.P.C. group: 985). E.P.C. group has a mean LOS shorter compared to pre-E.P.C. group (3.13 vs 4.19 days, p < 0.0001) without increasing on CPC (E.P.C. 12% vs pre-E.P.C. 11%, p = 0.74) and READM rate (E.P.C. 1.6% vs pre-E.P.C. 4.9%, p = 0.07). In particular, the LOS was shortened in the E.P.C. patients submitted to lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection. Moreover, the three subgroups had similar CPC and READM rates for E.P.C. and control patients. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the benefits and safety of E.P.C. program showing a reduction of LOS for patients undergoing uniportal V.A.T.S. resection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Refai M, Andolfi M, Gentili P et al (2018) Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery: patient information and care-plan. J Thorac Dis 10(4):512–516CrossRef Refai M, Andolfi M, Gentili P et al (2018) Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery: patient information and care-plan. J Thorac Dis 10(4):512–516CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gillis C, Gill M, Marlett N et al (2017) Patients as partners in enhanced recovery after surgery: a qualitative patient-led study. BMJ Open 7(6):e017002CrossRef Gillis C, Gill M, Marlett N et al (2017) Patients as partners in enhanced recovery after surgery: a qualitative patient-led study. BMJ Open 7(6):e017002CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Taurchini M, Del Naja C, Tancredi A (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a patient centered process. J Vis Surg 27(4):40CrossRef Taurchini M, Del Naja C, Tancredi A (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a patient centered process. J Vis Surg 27(4):40CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Madani A, Fiore J, Wang Y et al (2015) An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy. Surgery 158(4):899–908CrossRef Madani A, Fiore J, Wang Y et al (2015) An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy. Surgery 158(4):899–908CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Van Haren RM, Mehran JR, Mena GE et al (2018) Enhanced recovery decreased pulmonary and cardiac complications after thoracotomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 106:272–279CrossRef Van Haren RM, Mehran JR, Mena GE et al (2018) Enhanced recovery decreased pulmonary and cardiac complications after thoracotomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 106:272–279CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Scarci M, Solli P, Bedetti B (2016) Enhanced recovery pathway for thoracic surgery in the UK. J Thorac Dis 8:78–83 Scarci M, Solli P, Bedetti B (2016) Enhanced recovery pathway for thoracic surgery in the UK. J Thorac Dis 8:78–83
7.
go back to reference Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617CrossRef Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ljungqvist O, Young-Fadok T, Demartines N (2017) The history of enhanced recovery after surgery and the ERAS society. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(9):860–862CrossRef Ljungqvist O, Young-Fadok T, Demartines N (2017) The history of enhanced recovery after surgery and the ERAS society. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(9):860–862CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gimènez-Milà M, Klein AA, Martinez G (2016) Design and implementation of an enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 8:37–45 Gimènez-Milà M, Klein AA, Martinez G (2016) Design and implementation of an enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 8:37–45
10.
go back to reference Dinic VD, Stojanovic MD, Markovic D et al (2018) Enhanced recovery in thoracic surgery: a review. Front Med 5:5–14CrossRef Dinic VD, Stojanovic MD, Markovic D et al (2018) Enhanced recovery in thoracic surgery: a review. Front Med 5:5–14CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Laursen LO, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ et al (2016) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer is associated with a lower 30-day morbidity compared with lobectomy by thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49(3):870–875CrossRef Laursen LO, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ et al (2016) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer is associated with a lower 30-day morbidity compared with lobectomy by thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49(3):870–875CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Refai M, Andolfi M, Sabbatini A (2017) Physiopathology aspects of anatomical video-assisted thoracic surgery resections: current status and prospects of development. J Vis Surg 7(3):161CrossRef Refai M, Andolfi M, Sabbatini A (2017) Physiopathology aspects of anatomical video-assisted thoracic surgery resections: current status and prospects of development. J Vis Surg 7(3):161CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fiore J, Bejjani J, Conrad K et al (2016) Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151(3):708–715CrossRef Fiore J, Bejjani J, Conrad K et al (2016) Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151(3):708–715CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin PJ et al (2007) Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery. Chest 132(3):161–177CrossRef Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin PJ et al (2007) Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery. Chest 132(3):161–177CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Refai M, Salati M, Tiberi M et al (2016) Clinical pathway for thoracic surgery in an Italian centre. J Thorac Dis 8(1):23–28 Refai M, Salati M, Tiberi M et al (2016) Clinical pathway for thoracic surgery in an Italian centre. J Thorac Dis 8(1):23–28
16.
go back to reference Seely AJE, Ivanovic J, Threader J et al (2010) Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 90(3):936–942CrossRef Seely AJE, Ivanovic J, Threader J et al (2010) Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 90(3):936–942CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Austin PC (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat 10:150–161CrossRef Austin PC (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat 10:150–161CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, A, Bass C, et al (2001) Fast-tracking pulmonary resections. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122(2):318–324CrossRef Cerfolio RJ, A, Bass C, et al (2001) Fast-tracking pulmonary resections. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122(2):318–324CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wilmore DW, Kehlet H (2001) Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 322(7284):473–476CrossRef Wilmore DW, Kehlet H (2001) Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 322(7284):473–476CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F et al (2012) Does fast-tracking increase the readmission rate after pulmonary resection? A case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41(5):1083–1087CrossRef Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F et al (2012) Does fast-tracking increase the readmission rate after pulmonary resection? A case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41(5):1083–1087CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Muehling MB, Halter GL, Schelzig H et al (2008) Reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung surgery using a fast track clinical pathway. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34(1):174–180CrossRef Muehling MB, Halter GL, Schelzig H et al (2008) Reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung surgery using a fast track clinical pathway. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34(1):174–180CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. BJS 101:172–188CrossRef Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. BJS 101:172–188CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brunelli A, Thomas C, Dinesh P et al (2017) Enhanced recovery pathway versus standard care in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac CardioVascul Surg 154(6):2084–2090CrossRef Brunelli A, Thomas C, Dinesh P et al (2017) Enhanced recovery pathway versus standard care in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac CardioVascul Surg 154(6):2084–2090CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Foster C, Doucet V, Perentes JY et al (2021) Impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on thoracoscopic lobectomy outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients: propensity score-matched study. Transl Lung Cancer Res 10(1):93–103CrossRef Foster C, Doucet V, Perentes JY et al (2021) Impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on thoracoscopic lobectomy outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients: propensity score-matched study. Transl Lung Cancer Res 10(1):93–103CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tahiri M, Goudie E, Jouquan A et al (2020) Enhanced recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: a prospective, historically controlled, propensity-matched clinical study. Can J Surg 63(3):233–240CrossRef Tahiri M, Goudie E, Jouquan A et al (2020) Enhanced recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: a prospective, historically controlled, propensity-matched clinical study. Can J Surg 63(3):233–240CrossRef
26.
go back to reference E.R.A.S. Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261(6):1153–1159CrossRef E.R.A.S. Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261(6):1153–1159CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rogers LJ, Bleetman D, Messenger DE et al (2018) The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155(4):1843–1852CrossRef Rogers LJ, Bleetman D, Messenger DE et al (2018) The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155(4):1843–1852CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Puri V, Patel AP, Crabtree TD et al (2015) Unexpected readmission after lung cancer surgery: a benign event? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150:1496–1504CrossRef Puri V, Patel AP, Crabtree TD et al (2015) Unexpected readmission after lung cancer surgery: a benign event? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150:1496–1504CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Schatz C (2015) Enhanced recovery in a minimally invasive thoracic surgery program. AORN J 102(5):482–492CrossRef Schatz C (2015) Enhanced recovery in a minimally invasive thoracic surgery program. AORN J 102(5):482–492CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Harrison PL, Hara PA, Pope JE et al (2011) The impact of post-discharge telephonic follow-up on hospital readmissions. Popul Health Manag 14(1):27–32CrossRef Harrison PL, Hara PA, Pope JE et al (2011) The impact of post-discharge telephonic follow-up on hospital readmissions. Popul Health Manag 14(1):27–32CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of enhanced pathway of care in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Authors
Michela Tiberi
Marco Andolfi
Michele Salati
Alberto Roncon
Gian Marco Guiducci
Stefano Falcetta
Lorenzo Ambrosi
Majed Refai
Publication date
11-01-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Care
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01217-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Updates in Surgery 3/2022 Go to the issue