Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Risk factors for postoperative complications in robotic general surgery

Authors: Giovanni Fantola, Laurent Brunaud, Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi, Adeline Germain, Ahmet Ayav, Laurent Bresler

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The feasibility and safety of robotically assisted procedures in general surgery have been reported from various groups worldwide. Because postoperative complications may lead to longer hospital stays and higher costs overall, analysis of risk factors for postoperative surgical complications in this subset of patients is clinically relevant. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity after robotic surgical procedures in general surgery. We performed an observational monocentric retrospective study. All consecutive robotic surgical procedures from November 2001 to December 2013 were included. One thousand consecutive general surgery patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean overall postoperative morbidity and major postoperative morbidity (Clavien >III) rates were 20.4 and 6 %, respectively. This included a conversion rate of 4.4 %, reoperation rate of 4.5 %, and mortality rate of 0.2 %. Multivariate analysis showed that ASA score >3 [OR 1.7; 95 % CI (1.2–2.4)], hematocrit value <38 [OR 1.6; 95 % CI (1.1–2.2)], previous abdominal surgery [OR 1.5; 95 % CI (1–2)], advanced dissection [OR 5.8; 95 % CI (3.1–10.6)], and multiquadrant surgery [OR 2.5; 95 % CI (1.7–3.8)] remained independent risk factors for overall postoperative morbidity. It also showed that advanced dissection [OR 4.4; 95 % CI (1.9–9.6)] and multiquadrant surgery [OR 4.4; 95 % CI (2.3–8.5)] remained independent risk factors for major postoperative morbidity (Clavien >III). This study identifies independent risk factors for postoperative overall and major morbidity in robotic general surgery. Because these factors independently impacted postoperative complications, we believe they could be taken into account in future studies comparing conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures in general surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wormer BA, Dacey KT, Williams KB, Bradley JF 3rd, Walters AL, Augenstein VA et al (2014) The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start. Surg Endosc 28:767–776CrossRefPubMed Wormer BA, Dacey KT, Williams KB, Bradley JF 3rd, Walters AL, Augenstein VA et al (2014) The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start. Surg Endosc 28:767–776CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 19(363):701–704CrossRef Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 19(363):701–704CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg 79:553–560PubMed Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg 79:553–560PubMed
5.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Gorodner V, Ayloo SM, Elli EF et al (2012) Perioperative risk assessment in robotic general surgery: lessons learned from 884 cases at a single institution. Arch Surg 147:701–708CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Gorodner V, Ayloo SM, Elli EF et al (2012) Perioperative risk assessment in robotic general surgery: lessons learned from 884 cases at a single institution. Arch Surg 147:701–708CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Milone L, Daskalaki D, Fernandes E, Damoli I, Giulianotti PC (2013) State of the art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery. World J Surg 37:2747–2755CrossRefPubMed Milone L, Daskalaki D, Fernandes E, Damoli I, Giulianotti PC (2013) State of the art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery. World J Surg 37:2747–2755CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Milone L, Daskalaki D, Wang X, Giulianotti PC (2013) State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery. World J Surg 37:2761–2770CrossRefPubMed Milone L, Daskalaki D, Wang X, Giulianotti PC (2013) State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery. World J Surg 37:2761–2770CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262CrossRefPubMed Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL et al (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128–132CrossRefPubMed Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL et al (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128–132CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258:554–559PubMedPubMedCentral Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258:554–559PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Shen W-S, Xi H-Q, Chen L, Wei B (2014) A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 28:2795–2802CrossRefPubMed Shen W-S, Xi H-Q, Chen L, Wei B (2014) A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 28:2795–2802CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hara M, Sng K, Yoo BE, Shin JW, Lee DW, Kim SH (2014) Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 57:570–577CrossRefPubMed Hara M, Sng K, Yoo BE, Shin JW, Lee DW, Kim SH (2014) Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 57:570–577CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Benizri EI, Renaud M, Reibel N, Germain A, Ziegler O, Zarnegar R et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes after totally robotic gastric bypass: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. Am J Surg 206:145–151CrossRefPubMed Benizri EI, Renaud M, Reibel N, Germain A, Ziegler O, Zarnegar R et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes after totally robotic gastric bypass: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. Am J Surg 206:145–151CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Paul S, McCulloch P, Sedrakyan A (2013) Robotic surgery: revisiting “no innovation without evaluation”. BMJ 346:1573–1574CrossRef Paul S, McCulloch P, Sedrakyan A (2013) Robotic surgery: revisiting “no innovation without evaluation”. BMJ 346:1573–1574CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Al-Naami M, Anjum MN, Aldohayan A, Al-Khayal K, Alkharji H (2013) Robotic general surgery experience: a gradual progress from simple to more complex procedures. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9:486–491CrossRef Al-Naami M, Anjum MN, Aldohayan A, Al-Khayal K, Alkharji H (2013) Robotic general surgery experience: a gradual progress from simple to more complex procedures. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9:486–491CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonté F, Morel P (2014) Reliability of robotic system during general surgical procedures in a university hospital. Am J Surg 207:84–88CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonté F, Morel P (2014) Reliability of robotic system during general surgical procedures in a university hospital. Am J Surg 207:84–88CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Haga Y, Ikei S, Wada Y, Takeuchi H, Sameshima H, Kimura O et al (2001) Evaluation of an Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system to predict postoperative risk: a multicenter prospective study. Surg Today 31:569–574CrossRefPubMed Haga Y, Ikei S, Wada Y, Takeuchi H, Sameshima H, Kimura O et al (2001) Evaluation of an Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system to predict postoperative risk: a multicenter prospective study. Surg Today 31:569–574CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H, Schröder T (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 77:217–222CrossRefPubMed Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H, Schröder T (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 77:217–222CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Klotz HP, Candinas D, Platz A, Horvàth A, Dindo D, Schlumpf R et al (1996) Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery. Br J Surg 83:1788–1791CrossRefPubMed Klotz HP, Candinas D, Platz A, Horvàth A, Dindo D, Schlumpf R et al (1996) Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery. Br J Surg 83:1788–1791CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Yu H, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC (2012) Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 187:1392–1398CrossRefPubMed Yu H, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC (2012) Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 187:1392–1398CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Park YA, Kim JM, Kim SA, Min BS, Kim NK, Sohn SK et al (2010) Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one setup. Surg Endosc 24:715–720CrossRefPubMed Park YA, Kim JM, Kim SA, Min BS, Kim NK, Sohn SK et al (2010) Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one setup. Surg Endosc 24:715–720CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23:447–451CrossRefPubMed Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23:447–451CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Koh DC-S, Tsang CB-S, Kim S-H (2011) A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 25:1945–1952CrossRefPubMed Koh DC-S, Tsang CB-S, Kim S-H (2011) A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 25:1945–1952CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Leung JM, Dzankic S (2001) Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1080–1085CrossRefPubMed Leung JM, Dzankic S (2001) Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1080–1085CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Davenport DL, Ferraris VA, Hosokawa P, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Mentzer RM Jr (2007) Multivariable predictors of postoperative cardiac adverse events after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 204:1199–1210CrossRefPubMed Davenport DL, Ferraris VA, Hosokawa P, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Mentzer RM Jr (2007) Multivariable predictors of postoperative cardiac adverse events after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 204:1199–1210CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Aronson WL, McAuliffe MS, Miller K (2003) Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification Scale. AANA J 71:265–274PubMed Aronson WL, McAuliffe MS, Miller K (2003) Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification Scale. AANA J 71:265–274PubMed
29.
go back to reference Nandipati K, Lin E, Husain F, Perez S, Srinivasan J, Sweeney JF et al (2013) Factors predicting the increased risk for return to the operating room in bariatric patients: a NSQIP database study. Surg Endosc 27:1172–1177CrossRefPubMed Nandipati K, Lin E, Husain F, Perez S, Srinivasan J, Sweeney JF et al (2013) Factors predicting the increased risk for return to the operating room in bariatric patients: a NSQIP database study. Surg Endosc 27:1172–1177CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Van Goor H (2007) Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 2):25–34CrossRefPubMed Van Goor H (2007) Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 2):25–34CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Wilson MS, Menzies D et al (2001) Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:822–829CrossRefPubMed Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Wilson MS, Menzies D et al (2001) Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:822–829CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Dewberry SC et al (2010) Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg 97:70–78CrossRefPubMed Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Dewberry SC et al (2010) Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg 97:70–78CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Schaapveld M, Van Goor H (2000) Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg 87:467–471CrossRef Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Schaapveld M, Van Goor H (2000) Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg 87:467–471CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ten Broek RPG, Strik C, Issa Y, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H (2013) Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 258:98–106CrossRefPubMed Ten Broek RPG, Strik C, Issa Y, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H (2013) Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 258:98–106CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk factors for postoperative complications in robotic general surgery
Authors
Giovanni Fantola
Laurent Brunaud
Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi
Adeline Germain
Ahmet Ayav
Laurent Bresler
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0398-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Updates in Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue