Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Tumor Biology 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Research Article

CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis

Authors: Yan Zhang, Shengchun Tong, Lihua Guan, Fei Na, Wei Zhao, Li Wei

Published in: Tumor Biology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

CD95 is the first death receptor identified and characterized in recent years, and it plays important roles in the molecular network regulating cell death and survival. CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism is a common genetic polymorphism identified in the CD95 gene. Many publications evaluated the association between CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk, but the association remained inconclusive. To provide a more precise estimate on the association, a meta-analysis was carried out. The association between CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk was assessed by calculating the pooled odds ratio (OR) with its 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). On the basis of our inclusion criteria, ten studies with a total of 5,481 individuals were included into the meta-analysis. There was obvious heterogeneity among the included studies. Meta-analysis of the ten studies suggested that there was no association between CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk under all four genetic models (allele model: OR = 1.05, 95 % CI 0.92–1.18, P = 0.478; homozygous model: OR = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.83–1.41, P = 0.550; dominant model: OR = 1.12, 95 % CI 0.88–1.42, P = 0.347; recessive model: OR = 1.00, 95 % CI 0.76–1.31, P = 0.978). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity suggested that there was no association between CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk in Asians, Caucasians, and Africans. Thus, the meta-analysis suggests that CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism is not associated with cervical cancer risk.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;378:1461–84.PubMedCrossRef Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;378:1461–84.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370:890–907.PubMedCrossRef Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370:890–907.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Calhoun ES, McGovern RM, Janney CA, Cerhan JR, Iturria SJ, Smith DI, et al. Host genetic polymorphism analysis in cervical cancer. Clin Chem. 2002;48:1218–24.PubMed Calhoun ES, McGovern RM, Janney CA, Cerhan JR, Iturria SJ, Smith DI, et al. Host genetic polymorphism analysis in cervical cancer. Clin Chem. 2002;48:1218–24.PubMed
6.
go back to reference de Freitas AC, Gurgel AP, Chagas BS, Coimbra EC, do Amaral CM. Susceptibility to cervical cancer: an overview. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:304–11.PubMedCrossRef de Freitas AC, Gurgel AP, Chagas BS, Coimbra EC, do Amaral CM. Susceptibility to cervical cancer: an overview. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:304–11.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chaabane W, User SD, El-Gazzah M, Jaksik R, Sajjadi E, Rzeszowska-Wolny J, et al. Autophagy, apoptosis, mitoptosis and necrosis: interdependence between those pathways and effects on cancer. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2013;61:43–58.CrossRef Chaabane W, User SD, El-Gazzah M, Jaksik R, Sajjadi E, Rzeszowska-Wolny J, et al. Autophagy, apoptosis, mitoptosis and necrosis: interdependence between those pathways and effects on cancer. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2013;61:43–58.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schutze S, Tchikov V, Schneider-Brachert W. Regulation of TNFR1 and CD95 signalling by receptor compartmentalization. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:655–62.PubMedCrossRef Schutze S, Tchikov V, Schneider-Brachert W. Regulation of TNFR1 and CD95 signalling by receptor compartmentalization. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:655–62.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Steller EJ, Borel Rinkes IH, Kranenburg O. How CD95 stimulates invasion. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:3857–62.PubMedCrossRef Steller EJ, Borel Rinkes IH, Kranenburg O. How CD95 stimulates invasion. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:3857–62.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tauzin S, Debure L, Moreau JF, Legembre P. CD95-mediated cell signaling in cancer: mutations and post-translational modulations. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69:1261–77.PubMedCrossRef Tauzin S, Debure L, Moreau JF, Legembre P. CD95-mediated cell signaling in cancer: mutations and post-translational modulations. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69:1261–77.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yurchenko M, Shlapatska LM, Sidorenko SP. The multilevel regulation of CD95 signaling outcome. Exp Oncol. 2012;34:153–9.PubMed Yurchenko M, Shlapatska LM, Sidorenko SP. The multilevel regulation of CD95 signaling outcome. Exp Oncol. 2012;34:153–9.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ueda M, Toji E, Nunobiki O, Izuma S, Okamoto Y, Torii K, et al. Germline polymorphism of cancer susceptibility genes in gynecologic cancer. Hum Cell. 2008;21:95–104.PubMedCrossRef Ueda M, Toji E, Nunobiki O, Izuma S, Okamoto Y, Torii K, et al. Germline polymorphism of cancer susceptibility genes in gynecologic cancer. Hum Cell. 2008;21:95–104.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lai HC, Sytwu HK, Sun CA, Yu MH, Yu CP, Liu HS, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism at Fas promoter is associated with cervical carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer. 2003;103:221–5.PubMedCrossRef Lai HC, Sytwu HK, Sun CA, Yu MH, Yu CP, Liu HS, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism at Fas promoter is associated with cervical carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer. 2003;103:221–5.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zoodsma M, Nolte IM, Schipper M, Oosterom E, van der Steege G, de Vries EG, et al. Interleukin-10 and Fas polymorphisms and susceptibility for (pre)neoplastic cervical disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15 Suppl 3:282–90.PubMedCrossRef Zoodsma M, Nolte IM, Schipper M, Oosterom E, van der Steege G, de Vries EG, et al. Interleukin-10 and Fas polymorphisms and susceptibility for (pre)neoplastic cervical disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15 Suppl 3:282–90.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ueda M, Terai Y, Kanda K, Kanemura M, Takehara M, Yamaguchi H, et al. Fas gene promoter-670 polymorphism in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16 Suppl 1:179–82.PubMedCrossRef Ueda M, Terai Y, Kanda K, Kanemura M, Takehara M, Yamaguchi H, et al. Fas gene promoter-670 polymorphism in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16 Suppl 1:179–82.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kang S, Dong SM, Seo SS, Kim JW, Park SY. Fas-1377 G/A polymorphism and the risk of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;180:1–5.PubMedCrossRef Kang S, Dong SM, Seo SS, Kim JW, Park SY. Fas-1377 G/A polymorphism and the risk of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;180:1–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kordi Tamandani DM, Sobti RC, Shekari M. Association of Fas-670 gene polymorphism with risk of cervical cancer in north Indian population. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2008;35:183–6.PubMed Kordi Tamandani DM, Sobti RC, Shekari M. Association of Fas-670 gene polymorphism with risk of cervical cancer in north Indian population. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2008;35:183–6.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Chatterjee K, Engelmark M, Gyllensten U, Dandara C, van der Merwe L, Galal U, et al. Fas and FasL gene polymorphisms are not associated with cervical cancer but differ among black and mixed-ancestry South Africans. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:238.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Chatterjee K, Engelmark M, Gyllensten U, Dandara C, van der Merwe L, Galal U, et al. Fas and FasL gene polymorphisms are not associated with cervical cancer but differ among black and mixed-ancestry South Africans. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:238.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zucchi F, da Silva ID, Ribalta JC, de Souza NC, Speck NM, Girao MJ, et al. Fas/CD95 promoter polymorphism gene and its relationship with cervical carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009;30:142–4.PubMed Zucchi F, da Silva ID, Ribalta JC, de Souza NC, Speck NM, Girao MJ, et al. Fas/CD95 promoter polymorphism gene and its relationship with cervical carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009;30:142–4.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–29.CrossRef Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–29.CrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.PubMed Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Chen Y, Lv W, Qian Q, Ye F. Fas-670 single nucleotide polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer. Natl Med J China. 2006;86:2792–4. Chen Y, Lv W, Qian Q, Ye F. Fas-670 single nucleotide polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer. Natl Med J China. 2006;86:2792–4.
24.
go back to reference Li H, Guo HY, Sun T, Zhou YF, Lin DX, Zhang WH, et al. Association between Fas/Fas L genes promoter polymorphisms and pathogenic risk of cervical cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009;31:38–41.PubMed Li H, Guo HY, Sun T, Zhou YF, Lin DX, Zhang WH, et al. Association between Fas/Fas L genes promoter polymorphisms and pathogenic risk of cervical cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009;31:38–41.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Qiu L, Wang M, Tong N, Li J. The FAS ligand promoter polymorphism, rs763110 (−844C > T), contributes to cancer susceptibility: evidence from 19 case–control studies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:1294–303.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Zhang Z, Qiu L, Wang M, Tong N, Li J. The FAS ligand promoter polymorphism, rs763110 (−844C > T), contributes to cancer susceptibility: evidence from 19 case–control studies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:1294–303.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wu Z, Wang H, Chu X, Chen J, Fang S. Association between FAS-1377 G/A polymorphism and susceptibility to gastric cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2147–52.PubMedCrossRef Wu Z, Wang H, Chu X, Chen J, Fang S. Association between FAS-1377 G/A polymorphism and susceptibility to gastric cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2147–52.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wu CY, Yang M, Lin M, Li LP, Wen XZ. MTHFR C677T polymorphism was an ethnicity-dependent risk factor for cervical cancer development: evidence based on a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288:595–605.PubMedCrossRef Wu CY, Yang M, Lin M, Li LP, Wen XZ. MTHFR C677T polymorphism was an ethnicity-dependent risk factor for cervical cancer development: evidence based on a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288:595–605.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zhang HL, Zhang YJ. A systemic assessment of the association between tumor necrosis factor alpha 308 G/A polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1659–65.PubMedCrossRef Zhang HL, Zhang YJ. A systemic assessment of the association between tumor necrosis factor alpha 308 G/A polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1659–65.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sui Y, Han W, Yang Z, Jiang M, Li J. Association of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 null polymorphisms with the development of cervical lesions: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:443–8.PubMedCrossRef Sui Y, Han W, Yang Z, Jiang M, Li J. Association of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 null polymorphisms with the development of cervical lesions: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:443–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ni J, Ye Y, Teng F, Wu Q. Interleukin 10 polymorphisms and cervical cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23:126–33.PubMedCrossRef Ni J, Ye Y, Teng F, Wu Q. Interleukin 10 polymorphisms and cervical cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23:126–33.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Li F, Liu Y, Fu T, Tong W, Zhang A. Associations of three common polymorphisms in CD95 and CD95L promoter regions with gastric cancer risk. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2293–8.PubMedCrossRef Li F, Liu Y, Fu T, Tong W, Zhang A. Associations of three common polymorphisms in CD95 and CD95L promoter regions with gastric cancer risk. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2293–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Xue H, Gong W, Wang M, Yuan L, Han S, et al. FAS promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 34 case–control studies. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:487–93.PubMedCrossRef Zhang Z, Xue H, Gong W, Wang M, Yuan L, Han S, et al. FAS promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 34 case–control studies. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:487–93.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis
Authors
Yan Zhang
Shengchun Tong
Lihua Guan
Fei Na
Wei Zhao
Li Wei
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Tumor Biology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Electronic ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1237-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Tumor Biology 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine