Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Insights into Imaging
Published in: Insights into Imaging 4/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017 | Original Article

Ergonomic strategies to improve radiographers’ posture during mammography activities

Authors: Nicolai Cernean, Florentino Serranheira, Pedro Gonçalves, Cláudia Sá dos Reis

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To identify alternatives for radiographers’ postures while performing mammography that can contribute to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs).

Methods

Radiographers’ postures to positioning craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views were simulated without any intervention for three scenarios: radiographer/patient with similar statures, radiographer smaller than patient and radiographer taller than patient. Actions were taken to modify the postures: seated radiographer; patient on a step; seated patient; radiographer on a step. All the postures were analysed using kinovea 0.8.15 software and the angles were measured twice and classified according to European standard EN1005–4: 2005.

Results

The non-acceptable angles were measured mainly during MLO positioning when radiographer was taller than the patient: 139° and 120° for arm-flexion and abduction, 72° for trunk and −24° for head/neck-flexion. The introduction of alternative postures (radiographer seated), allowed improvements in posture (60° and 99° for arm flexion and abduction, 14° for trunk and 0° for head/neck flexion), being classified as acceptable.

Conclusions

The alternative postures simulated have the potential to reduce the risk of developing WRMSDs when radiographers and patients have different statures.

Main messages

• Radiographers’ postures in mammography can contribute to work-related musculoskeletal disorders
• Non-acceptable posture was identified for MLO breast positioning (radiographer taller than patient)
• Adapting posture to patient biotype reduces the WRMSD risk for radiographers
Literature
1.
Costa S, Oliveira E, Reis C et al (2014) Mammography equipment design: impact on radiographers’ practice. Insights Imaging 5:723–730
2.
Cheesman A (2008) Workplace ergonomics for the health care professional. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 39:198–205CrossRef
3.
Boiselle PM, Levine D, Horwich PJ et al (2008) Repetitive stress symptoms in radiology: prevalence and response to ergonomic interventions. J Am Coll Radiol 5:919–923CrossRefPubMed
4.
Feldstein A, Breen V, Dana N (1998) Prevention of work-related disability. Am J Prev Med 14:33–39CrossRefPubMed
5.
Whysall Z, Haslam C, Haslam R (2006) A stage of change approach to reducing occupational ill health. Prev Med (Baltim) 43:422–428CrossRef
6.
Thompson AC, Kremer Prill MJ, Biswal S et al (2014) Factors associated with repetitive strain, and strategies to reduce injury among breast-imaging radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1074–1079CrossRefPubMed
7.
Siegal DS, Levine D, Siewert B et al (2010) Repetitive stress symptoms among radiology technologists: prevalence and major causative factors. J Am Coll Radiol 7:956–960CrossRefPubMed
8.
Robertson MM, Boiselle P, Eisenberg R et al (2012) Examination of computer task exposures in radiologists: a work systems approach. Work 41(Suppl 1):1818–1820PubMed
9.
Serranheira F, Sousa Uva A, Lopes M (2008) Caderno/Avulso 5—Lesões Músculo-Esqueléticas e Trabalho: Alguns métodos de avaliação do risco. Sociedade Portuguesa Medicina do Trabalho, Lisboa
10.
11.
12.
Krupinski EA (2006) Technology and perception in the 21st-century reading room. J Am Coll Radiol 3:433–440CrossRefPubMed
13.
Kumar S, Moro L, Narayan Y (2004) Morbidity among X-ray technologists. Int J Ind Ergon 33:29–40CrossRef
14.
Reis C (2013) Digital mammography: characterisation of practice and equipment performance in Portuguese healthcare providers. Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon
15.
Reis C, Sakellaris T, Carrasqueiro S, Pascoal A (2012) Digital mammography in Portugal: a national survey on technology and practices. In: Symposium Mammographicum 2012 Meeting Abstracts. The British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 1–15
16.
Kolb GR (2005) Solving the digital dilemma: a strategic approach. Semin Breast Dis 8:43–53CrossRef
17.
18.
19.
Zuley ML (2010) The basics and implementation of digital mammography. Radiol Clin N Am 48:893–901CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ergonomic strategies to improve radiographers’ posture during mammography activities
Authors
Nicolai Cernean
Florentino Serranheira
Pedro Gonçalves
Cláudia Sá dos Reis
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 4/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0560-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Insights into Imaging 4/2017 Go to the issue

Pictorial Review

Early postoperative imaging after non-bariatric gastric resection: a primer for radiologists

Review

Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a review of the dangers and difficulties in MR scanning and attempts to improve safety

Review

Liver segmentation: indications, techniques and future directions

Review

Imaging-guided chest biopsies: techniques and clinical results

Pictorial Review

Breast magnetic resonance imaging: tips for the diagnosis of silicone-induced granuloma of a breast implant capsule (SIGBIC)