Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 2/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016 | Pictorial Review

MRI evaluation prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): When to acquire and how to interpret

Authors: Abhishek Chaturvedi, Susan K. Hobbs, Fred S. Ling, Apeksha Chaturvedi, Peter Knight

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is increasingly being used in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgery. ECG-gated CT angiography (CTA) plays an important role in the preoperative planning for these devices. As the number of patients undergoing these procedures increases, a subset of patients is being recognized who have contraindications to iodinated contrast medium, either due to a prior severe allergic type reaction or poor renal function. Another subgroup of patients with low flow and low gradient aortic stenosis is being recognized that are usually assessed for severity of aortic stenosis by stress echocardiography. There are contraindications to stress echocardiography and some of these patients may not be able to undergo this test. Non-contrast MRI can be a useful emerging modality for evaluating these patients. In this article, we discuss the emerging indications of non-contrast MRI in preoperative assessment for TAVI and describe the commonly used MRI sequences. A comparison of the most important measurements obtained for TAVI assessment on CTA and MRI from same subjects is included.
Teaching Points
MRI can be used for preoperative assessment of aortic annulus.
MRI is an alternate to CTA when iodinated contrast is contraindicated.
Measurements obtained by non-contrast MRI are similar to contrast enhanced CTA.
MRI can be used to assess severity of aortic stenosis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bennett CJ, Maleszewski JJ, Araoz PA (2012) CT and MR imaging of the aortic valve: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 32:1399–1420CrossRefPubMed Bennett CJ, Maleszewski JJ, Araoz PA (2012) CT and MR imaging of the aortic valve: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 32:1399–1420CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607CrossRefPubMed Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Quail MA, Nordmeyer J, Schievano S, Reinthaler M, Mullen MJ, Taylor AM (2012) Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for TAVR assessment in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves: comparison with computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 81:3912–3917CrossRefPubMed Quail MA, Nordmeyer J, Schievano S, Reinthaler M, Mullen MJ, Taylor AM (2012) Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for TAVR assessment in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves: comparison with computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 81:3912–3917CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2012) Aortic annulus area assessment by multidetector computed tomography for predicting paravalvular regurgitation in patients undergoing balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J 164:576–584CrossRefPubMed Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2012) Aortic annulus area assessment by multidetector computed tomography for predicting paravalvular regurgitation in patients undergoing balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J 164:576–584CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Joshi SB, Mendoza DD, Steinberg DH et al (2009) Ultra-low-dose intra-arterial contrast injection for iliofemoral computed tomographic angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:1404–1411CrossRefPubMed Joshi SB, Mendoza DD, Steinberg DH et al (2009) Ultra-low-dose intra-arterial contrast injection for iliofemoral computed tomographic angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:1404–1411CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N et al (2011) Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:2165–2173CrossRefPubMed Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N et al (2011) Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:2165–2173CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR et al (2012) Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 366:1686–1695CrossRefPubMed Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR et al (2012) Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 366:1686–1695CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S et al (2012) 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: developed in collabration with the american heart association, american society of echocardiography, european association for cardio-thoracic surgery, heart failure society of america, mended hearts, society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists, society of cardiovascular computed tomography, and society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:e29–e84CrossRefPubMed Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S et al (2012) 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: developed in collabration with the american heart association, american society of echocardiography, european association for cardio-thoracic surgery, heart failure society of america, mended hearts, society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists, society of cardiovascular computed tomography, and society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:e29–e84CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rajani R, Hancock J, Chambers JB (2012) The art of assessing aortic stenosis. Heart 98(Suppl 4):iv14–iv22CrossRefPubMed Rajani R, Hancock J, Chambers JB (2012) The art of assessing aortic stenosis. Heart 98(Suppl 4):iv14–iv22CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference La Manna A, Sanfilippo A, Capodanno D et al (2011) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral La Manna A, Sanfilippo A, Capodanno D et al (2011) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Koos R, Altiok E, Mahnken AH et al (2012) Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 158:353–358CrossRefPubMed Koos R, Altiok E, Mahnken AH et al (2012) Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 158:353–358CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Paelinck BP, Van Herck PL, Rodrigus I et al (2011) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates. Am J Cardiol 108:92–98CrossRefPubMed Paelinck BP, Van Herck PL, Rodrigus I et al (2011) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates. Am J Cardiol 108:92–98CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG (2007) American society of echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:1021–1041CrossRefPubMed Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG (2007) American society of echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:1021–1041CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Freixa X, Chan J, Bonan R et al (2015) Impact of coronary artery disease on left ventricular ejection fraction recovery following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85:450–458CrossRefPubMed Freixa X, Chan J, Bonan R et al (2015) Impact of coronary artery disease on left ventricular ejection fraction recovery following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85:450–458CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Charitos EI, Sievers HH (2013) Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for valve-sparing surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:53–56PubMedPubMedCentral Charitos EI, Sievers HH (2013) Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for valve-sparing surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:53–56PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lopez-Mattei JC, Shah DJ (2013) When to consider cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement? Curr Opin Cardiol 28:505–511CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Mattei JC, Shah DJ (2013) When to consider cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement? Curr Opin Cardiol 28:505–511CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ruile P, Blanke P, Krauss T et al (2015) Pre-procedural assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: comparison of a non-contrast 3D MRA protocol with contrast-enhanced cardiac dual-source CT angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jev188 PubMed Ruile P, Blanke P, Krauss T et al (2015) Pre-procedural assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: comparison of a non-contrast 3D MRA protocol with contrast-enhanced cardiac dual-source CT angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.​1093/​ehjci/​jev188 PubMed
19.
go back to reference Tsang W, Bateman MG, Weinert L et al (2012) Accuracy of aortic annular measurements obtained from three-dimensional echocardiography, CT and MRI: human in vitro and in vivo studies. Heart 98:1146–1152CrossRefPubMed Tsang W, Bateman MG, Weinert L et al (2012) Accuracy of aortic annular measurements obtained from three-dimensional echocardiography, CT and MRI: human in vitro and in vivo studies. Heart 98:1146–1152CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:366–380CrossRefPubMed Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:366–380CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G et al (2011) Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 150:142–145CrossRefPubMed Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G et al (2011) Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 150:142–145CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Feuchtner G, Plank F, Bartel T et al (2013) Prediction of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography: value of aortic valve and annular calcification. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1574–1580CrossRefPubMed Feuchtner G, Plank F, Bartel T et al (2013) Prediction of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography: value of aortic valve and annular calcification. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1574–1580CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wijesinghe N, Ye J, Rodes-Cabau J et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:1122–1125CrossRefPubMed Wijesinghe N, Ye J, Rodes-Cabau J et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:1122–1125CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Puymirat E, Chassaing S, Trinquart L et al (2010) Hakki's formula for measurement of aortic valve area by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 106:249–254CrossRefPubMed Puymirat E, Chassaing S, Trinquart L et al (2010) Hakki's formula for measurement of aortic valve area by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 106:249–254CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Litmanovich DE, Ghersin E, Burke DA, Popma J, Shahrzad M, Bankier AA (2014) Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): role of the radiologist. Insights Imaging 5:123–145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Litmanovich DE, Ghersin E, Burke DA, Popma J, Shahrzad M, Bankier AA (2014) Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): role of the radiologist. Insights Imaging 5:123–145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Silvera SS, Aidi HE, Rudd JH et al (2009) Multimodality imaging of atherosclerotic plaque activity and composition using FDG-PET/CT and MRI in carotid and femoral arteries. Atherosclerosis 207:139–143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silvera SS, Aidi HE, Rudd JH et al (2009) Multimodality imaging of atherosclerotic plaque activity and composition using FDG-PET/CT and MRI in carotid and femoral arteries. Atherosclerosis 207:139–143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference van Rosendael PJ, Kamperidis V, van der Kley F et al (2015) Atherosclerosis burden of the aortic valve and aorta and risk of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:129–138CrossRefPubMed van Rosendael PJ, Kamperidis V, van der Kley F et al (2015) Atherosclerosis burden of the aortic valve and aorta and risk of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:129–138CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tenenbaum A, Garniek A, Shemesh J et al (1998) Dual-helical CT for detecting aortic atheromas as a source of stroke: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 208:153–158CrossRefPubMed Tenenbaum A, Garniek A, Shemesh J et al (1998) Dual-helical CT for detecting aortic atheromas as a source of stroke: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 208:153–158CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Fayad ZA, Nahar T, Fallon JT et al (2000) In vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in the human thoracic aorta: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 101:2503–2509CrossRefPubMed Fayad ZA, Nahar T, Fallon JT et al (2000) In vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in the human thoracic aorta: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 101:2503–2509CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA et al (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines, american association for thoracic surgery, american college of radiology, american stroke association, society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of interventional radiology, society of thoracic surgeons, and society for vascular medicine. Circulation 121:e266–e369CrossRefPubMed Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA et al (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines, american association for thoracic surgery, american college of radiology, american stroke association, society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of interventional radiology, society of thoracic surgeons, and society for vascular medicine. Circulation 121:e266–e369CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Bapat V, Attia R (2012) Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation: step-by-step guide. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24:206–211CrossRefPubMed Bapat V, Attia R (2012) Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation: step-by-step guide. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24:206–211CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Walther T, Kempfert J (2012) Transapical vs. transfemoral aortic valve implantation: Which approach for which patient, from a surgeon's standpoint. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1:216–219PubMedPubMedCentral Walther T, Kempfert J (2012) Transapical vs. transfemoral aortic valve implantation: Which approach for which patient, from a surgeon's standpoint. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1:216–219PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Orwat S, Diller GP, Kaleschke G et al (2014) Aortic regurgitation severity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is underestimated by echocardiography compared with MRI. Heart 100:1933–1938CrossRefPubMed Orwat S, Diller GP, Kaleschke G et al (2014) Aortic regurgitation severity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is underestimated by echocardiography compared with MRI. Heart 100:1933–1938CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Ribeiro HB, Le Ven F, Larose E et al (2014) Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart 100:1924–1932CrossRefPubMed Ribeiro HB, Le Ven F, Larose E et al (2014) Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart 100:1924–1932CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Beurich HW et al (2011) Haemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. EuroIntervention 7:57–63CrossRefPubMed Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Beurich HW et al (2011) Haemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. EuroIntervention 7:57–63CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Lerakis S, Hayek SS, Douglas PS (2013) Paravalvular aortic leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current knowledge. Circulation 127:397–407CrossRefPubMed Lerakis S, Hayek SS, Douglas PS (2013) Paravalvular aortic leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current knowledge. Circulation 127:397–407CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Kasel AM, Cassese S, Bleiziffer S et al (2013) Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:249–262CrossRefPubMed Kasel AM, Cassese S, Bleiziffer S et al (2013) Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:249–262CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MRI evaluation prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): When to acquire and how to interpret
Authors
Abhishek Chaturvedi
Susan K. Hobbs
Fred S. Ling
Apeksha Chaturvedi
Peter Knight
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 2/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0470-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Insights into Imaging 2/2016 Go to the issue