Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2016

Open Access 01-02-2016 | Report

Summary of the proceedings of the International Summit 2015: General and subspecialty radiology

Author: European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The need for subspecialisation in radiology and the relationship of general and subspecialist radiologists is very diverse in different regions of the world according to the reports presented at the ESR International Summit, organised by the ESR during the European Congress of Radiology in March 2015 in Vienna. The International Summit is held once a year by the ESR and its national and international radiological partner societies from outside Europe with the aim to address and discuss selected subjects of global relevance in radiology. In 2015, the relationship between general and subspecialist radiologists was analysed. It was shown that the situation differs immensely between developed and developing countries; in developed countries, a considerable proportion of radiologists are subspecialty trained; subspecialty radiologists practise mainly in large and academic departments, and many radiologists practise as multispecialty radiologists. In many developing countries only general radiologists—if available at all—practise radiology, and imaging interpretation is often performed by physicians with very limited relevant training or in some cases even by non-physicians.

Main messages

Subspecialisation and preservation of the integrity of the radiology profession are relevant for improved patient care.
Subspecialisation is needed in large departments, providing the basis for innovation and research.
Subspecialty sections should preferably remain within the overarching radiology department.
Shared facilities, efficient use of resources and common organisational structures are beneficial.
A multispecialty radiologist model is an option to build robust academic and private practices.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Smith GG, Thrall JH, Pentecost MJ et al (2009) Subspecialization in radiology and radiation oncology. J Am Coll Radiol 6:147–159CrossRefPubMed Smith GG, Thrall JH, Pentecost MJ et al (2009) Subspecialization in radiology and radiation oncology. J Am Coll Radiol 6:147–159CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Liebscher L, Sherry C, Breslau J et al (2012) The general radiologist in the 21st century. J Am Coll Radiol 9:554–559CrossRefPubMed Liebscher L, Sherry C, Breslau J et al (2012) The general radiologist in the 21st century. J Am Coll Radiol 9:554–559CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Heller RE 3rd (2014) The total value equation: a suggested framework for understanding value creation in diagnostic radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 11:24–29CrossRefPubMed Heller RE 3rd (2014) The total value equation: a suggested framework for understanding value creation in diagnostic radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 11:24–29CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Future Scanning and Signposts Working Group (2014) Role of the general radiologist for the future. Report to the Canadian Association of Radiology Board of Directors. Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa Future Scanning and Signposts Working Group (2014) Role of the general radiologist for the future. Report to the Canadian Association of Radiology Board of Directors. Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa
Metadata
Title
Summary of the proceedings of the International Summit 2015: General and subspecialty radiology
Author
European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0453-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Insights into Imaging 1/2016 Go to the issue