Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Insights into Imaging
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2016

Open Access 01-02-2016 | Original Article

Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers

Authors: Jonathan L. Portelli, Jonathan P. McNulty, Paul Bezzina, Louise Rainford

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives are to investigate radiology practitioners’ and radiographers’ radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging examinations.

Methods

A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers working at a primary paediatric referral centre in Malta. Part of the survey asked participants to indicate the typical effective dose (ED) for several commonly performed paediatric imaging examinations, answer five true-false statements about radiation protection principles, and specify their use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging.

Results

The return of 112 questionnaires provided a response rate of 66.7 %. Overall, imaging practitioners demonstrated poor awareness of radiation doses associated with several paediatric imaging examinations, with only 20 % providing the correct ED estimate for radiation-based examinations. Nearly all participants had undertaken radiation protection training, but the type and duration of training undertaken varied. When asked about the use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging, 77.3 % claimed that they ‘did not’ or ‘were not sure’ if they made use of them.

Conclusions

Poor awareness of radiation doses associated with paediatric imaging examinations and the non-use of referral guidelines may impede imaging practitioners’ role in the justification and optimisation of paediatric imaging examinations. Education and training activities to address such shortcomings are recommended.

Key Points

• Imaging practitioners demonstrated poor radiation dose awareness for 5 paediatric imaging examinations.
• Most radiology practitioners and radiographers were ‘not sure’ or ‘did not’ use referral guidelines.
• Imaging practitioners generally considered previously undertaken paediatric imaging examinations.
• Some imaging practitioners had not undertaken training in radiation protection for 10 years.
• Training activities to address imaging practitioners’ poor radiation dose awareness are encouraged.
Literature
1.
Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Frush DP, Hall EJ, Howell RW et al (2010) Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 258(3):889–905CrossRefPubMed
2.
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:199–555
3.
Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346(1):f2360PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
ICRP (1991) Publication 60: Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21:1–3CrossRef
5.
6.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiaiton (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiaiton. United Nations; 2010
7.
European Commission (2014) Council directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Off J Eur Union 57:L13
8.
Government of Malta (2012) Public Health Act (Cap. 465), Legal Notice 353 of 2012: Medical Exposure (Ionising Radiation) Regulations
9.
Malone JF (2009) Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosim 135(2):137–144CrossRef
10.
Frush DP (2011) Justification and optimization of CT in children: how are we performing? Pediatr Radiol 41(S2):467–471CrossRefPubMed
11.
Goske M, Applegate K, Boylan J (2008) The image gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273CrossRefPubMed
12.
Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC, Bulas D, Frush DP, Butler P et al (2010) Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. Am J Roentgenol 194(4):868–873CrossRef
13.
Boone JM, Hendee WR, McNitt-Gray MF, Seltzer SE (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans: how to close our knowledge gaps, monitor and safeguard exposure—proceedings and recommendations of the Radiation Dose Summit, Sponsored by NIBIB, February 24–25, 2011. Radiology 265(2):544–554PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
Borgen L, Stranden E (2014) Radiation knowledge and perception of referral practice among radiologists and radiographers compared with referring clinicians. Insights Imaging 5(5):635–640PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Heyer CM, Hansmann J, Peters SA, Lemburg SP (2010) Paediatrician awareness of radiation dose and inherent risks in chest imaging studies—a questionnaire study. Eur J Radiol 76(2):288–293CrossRefPubMed
17.
Heyer C, Peters S, Lemburg S, Nicolas V (2006) Awareness of radiation exposure of thoracic CT scans and conventional radiographs: what do non-radiologists know? Röfo 179:261–267
18.
Jacob K, Vivian G, Steel JR (2004) X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough? Clin Radiol 59(10):928–934CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231(2):393–398CrossRefPubMed
20.
Quinn A, Taylor C, Sabharwal T, Sikdar T (1997) Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists. Br J Radiol 70(829):102–106CrossRefPubMed
21.
Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, Galland RB, Lewis MH, Gower-Thomas K (2003) Doctors’ knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 327(7411):371–372PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
Soye JA, Paterson A (2008) A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. Br J Radiol 81(969):725–729CrossRefPubMed
23.
Thomas K, Parnell-Parmley J, Haidar S, Moineddin R, Charkot E, BenDavid G et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36(8):823–832CrossRefPubMed
24.
Merzenich H, Krille L, Hammer G, Kaiser M, Yamashita S, Zeeb H (2012) Paediatric CT scan usage and referrals of children to computed tomography in Germany-a cross-sectional survey of medical practice and awareness of radiation related health risks among physicians. BMC Health Serv Res 12(1):47PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C, Horton P, Jarvinen H, Mayo J et al (2012) Justification of diagnostic medical exposures: some practical issues. Report of an International Atomic Energy Agency Consultation. Br J Radiol 85(1013):523–538PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
26.
European Commission, Directorate General for Energy (2014) Referral guidelines for medical imaging: availability and use in the European Union. Radiation Protection No. 178. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. doi:10.​2833/​18118
27.
28.
Vogt WP, Vogt ER, Gardner DC, Haeffele LM (2014) Selecting the right analysis for your data: quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. The Guilford Press, New York
29.
Hart D, Hillier MC, Wall BF (2009) National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK. Br J Radiol 82(973):1–12CrossRefPubMed
30.
Huda W, Vance A (2007) Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol 188(2):540–546CrossRef
31.
Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248(1):254–263CrossRefPubMed
32.
Thomas KE, Wang B (2008) Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol 38(6):645–656CrossRefPubMed
33.
Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79(948):968–980CrossRefPubMed
34.
Groves AM, Yates SJ, Win T, Kayani I, Gallagher FA, Syed R et al (2006) CT pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in pregnancy: implications from a UK survey of Doctors’ knowledge of radiation exposure. Radiology 240(3):765–770CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
ICRP (2009) Publication 113: Education and Training in Radiological Protection for Diagnostic and Interventional Procedures. Ann ICRP 39(5)
Metadata
Title
Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers
Authors
Jonathan L. Portelli
Jonathan P. McNulty
Paul Bezzina
Louise Rainford
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0449-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Insights into Imaging 1/2016 Go to the issue

Review

Imaging the postoperative patient: long-term complications of gastrointestinal surgery

Pictorial Review

CT imaging features of atrioventricular shunts: what the radiologist must know

Report

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: role of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and CT-guided transthoracic core lung biopsy

Pictorial Review

Orbital tumours and tumour-like lesions: exploring the armamentarium of multiparametric imaging

Opinion

Lights and shadows of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocarditis

Pictorial Review

Ultrasonography of thyroid nodules: a pictorial review