Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 2/2015

Open Access 01-04-2015 | Statement

Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting - a promising new approach to obtain standardized imaging biomarkers from MRI

Author: European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Current routine MRI examinations rely on the acquisition of qualitative images that have a contrast “weighted” for a mixture of (magnetic) tissue properties. Recently, a novel approach was introduced, namely MR Fingerprinting (MRF) with a completely different approach to data acquisition, post-processing and visualization. Instead of using a repeated, serial acquisition of data for the characterization of individual parameters of interest, MRF uses a pseudo randomized acquisition that causes the signals from different tissues to have a unique signal evolution or ‘fingerprint’ that is simultaneously a function of the multiple material properties under investigation. The processing after acquisition involves a pattern recognition algorithm to match the fingerprints to a predefined dictionary of predicted signal evolutions. These can then be translated into quantitative maps of the magnetic parameters of interest. MR Fingerprinting (MRF) is a technique that could theoretically be applied to most traditional qualitative MRI methods and replaces them with acquisition of truly quantitative tissue measures. MRF is, thereby, expected to be much more accurate and reproducible than traditional MRI and should improve multi-center studies and significantly reduce reader bias when diagnostic imaging is performed.
Key Points
MR fingerprinting (MRF) is a new approach to data acquisition, post-processing and visualization.
MRF provides highly accurate quantitative maps of T1, T2, proton density, diffusion.
MRF may offer multiparametric imaging with high reproducibility, and high potential for multicenter/ multivendor studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Filippi M, Absinta M, Rocca MA (2013) Future MRI tools in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 331:14–18CrossRefPubMed Filippi M, Absinta M, Rocca MA (2013) Future MRI tools in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 331:14–18CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Larsson HB, Frederiksen J, Petersen J, Nordenbo A, Zeeberg I, Henriksen O, Olesen J (1989) Assessment of demyelination, edema, and gliosis by in vivo determination of T1 and T2 in the brain of patients with acute attack of multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 11:337–348CrossRefPubMed Larsson HB, Frederiksen J, Petersen J, Nordenbo A, Zeeberg I, Henriksen O, Olesen J (1989) Assessment of demyelination, edema, and gliosis by in vivo determination of T1 and T2 in the brain of patients with acute attack of multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 11:337–348CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference E.S.o.R. (ESR) (2013) ESR statement on the stepwise development of imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 4:147–152CrossRef E.S.o.R. (ESR) (2013) ESR statement on the stepwise development of imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 4:147–152CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Warntjes JBM, Dahlqvist P, Leinhard O, West J, Lundberg P (2008) Optimization for Clinical Usage of Rapid Magnetic Resonance Quantification on the brain. Magn Reson Med 60:320–329CrossRefPubMed Warntjes JBM, Dahlqvist P, Leinhard O, West J, Lundberg P (2008) Optimization for Clinical Usage of Rapid Magnetic Resonance Quantification on the brain. Magn Reson Med 60:320–329CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Warntjes JBM, Dahlqvist O, Lundberg P (2008) Novel Method for Rapid, Simultaneous T1, T*2, and Proton Density Quantification. Magn Reson Med 57:528–537CrossRef Warntjes JBM, Dahlqvist O, Lundberg P (2008) Novel Method for Rapid, Simultaneous T1, T*2, and Proton Density Quantification. Magn Reson Med 57:528–537CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM (2007) Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 58:1182–1195CrossRefPubMed Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM (2007) Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 58:1182–1195CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Deoni SC, Peters TM, Rutt BK (2005) High-resolution T1 and T2 mapping of the brain in a clinically acceptable time with DESPOT1 and DESPOT2. Magn Reson Med 53:237–241CrossRefPubMed Deoni SC, Peters TM, Rutt BK (2005) High-resolution T1 and T2 mapping of the brain in a clinically acceptable time with DESPOT1 and DESPOT2. Magn Reson Med 53:237–241CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schmitt P, Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Kotas M, Gulani V, Flentje M, Haase A (2004) Inversion recovery TrueFISP: quantification of T(1), T(2), and spin density. Magn Reson Med 51:661–667CrossRefPubMed Schmitt P, Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Kotas M, Gulani V, Flentje M, Haase A (2004) Inversion recovery TrueFISP: quantification of T(1), T(2), and spin density. Magn Reson Med 51:661–667CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Crawley AP, Henkelman RM (1988) A comparison of one-shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging. Magn Reson Med 7:23–34CrossRefPubMed Crawley AP, Henkelman RM (1988) A comparison of one-shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging. Magn Reson Med 7:23–34CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting - a promising new approach to obtain standardized imaging biomarkers from MRI
Author
European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 2/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0403-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Insights into Imaging 2/2015 Go to the issue