Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 3/2014

Open Access 01-06-2014 | Opinion

Small (<1 cm) incidental echogenic renal cortical nodules: chemical shift MRI outperforms CT for confirmatory diagnosis of angiomyolipoma (AML)

Authors: Nicola Schieda, Leonard Avruch, Trevor A. Flood

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Non-calcified echogenic renal cortical nodules are commonly detected with abdominal ultrasound (US). The majority of these nodules represent benign angiomyolipomas (AMLs), which are present in 0.3–2.1 % of the population at autopsy [1]. The increased echogenicity (in the absence of calcification) of renal AML is due to the presence of gross or mature fat within the nodule [2]. Although renal AMLs are typically markedly echogenic, echogenicity may vary depending upon the relative proportion of fat, smooth muscle and blood vessels within the nodule [3, 4]. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is traditionally considered to be less echogenic than renal cortical parenchyma, although the echogenicity of RCC varies with its size. Forman et al. [5] demonstrated that one-third of RCCs less than 3 cm in size are as echogenic as “classic” AML. In a recent meta-analysis, Farrelly et al. [6] demonstrated that nearly half of small RCCs are more echogenic than renal cortical parenchyma and 11.5 % are as echogenic as renal sinus fat. The increased echogenicity of small RCC is attributed to cell arrangement with increased internal interfaces and the presence of internal degeneration or haemorrhage [7]. Nodule heterogeneity, intratumoural cysts and the presence of a hypoechoic rim are specific sonographic findings that favour echogenic RCC; while posterior acoustic shadowing is a specific sonographic finding that favours AML [6]. Although these differentiating sonographic findings are specific, they lack the sensitivity required to discriminate between AML and RCC when a small echogenic renal cortical nodule is detected in everyday practice [6]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hajdu SI, Foote FW Jr (1969) Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: report of 27 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 102:396–401PubMed Hajdu SI, Foote FW Jr (1969) Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: report of 27 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 102:396–401PubMed
2.
go back to reference Siegel CL, Middleton WD, Teefey SA, McClennan BL (1996) Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation. Radiology 198:789–793PubMedCrossRef Siegel CL, Middleton WD, Teefey SA, McClennan BL (1996) Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation. Radiology 198:789–793PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hartman DS, Goldman SM, Friedman AC, Davis CJ Jr, Madewell JE, Sherman JL (1981) Angiomyolipoma: ultrasonic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 139:451–458PubMedCrossRef Hartman DS, Goldman SM, Friedman AC, Davis CJ Jr, Madewell JE, Sherman JL (1981) Angiomyolipoma: ultrasonic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 139:451–458PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Paivansalo M, Lahde S, Hyvarinen S, Kallioinen M, Jalovaara P (1991) Renal angiomyolipoma. Ultrasonographic, CT, angiographic, and histologic correlation. Acta Radiol 32:239–243PubMed Paivansalo M, Lahde S, Hyvarinen S, Kallioinen M, Jalovaara P (1991) Renal angiomyolipoma. Ultrasonographic, CT, angiographic, and histologic correlation. Acta Radiol 32:239–243PubMed
5.
go back to reference Forman HP, Middleton WD, Melson GL, McClennan BL (1993) Hyperechoic renal cell carcinomas: increase in detection at US. Radiology 188:431–434PubMedCrossRef Forman HP, Middleton WD, Melson GL, McClennan BL (1993) Hyperechoic renal cell carcinomas: increase in detection at US. Radiology 188:431–434PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Farrelly C, Delaney H, McDermott R, Malone D (2008) Do all non-calcified echogenic renal lesions found on ultrasound need further evaluation with CT? Abdom Imaging 33:44–47PubMedCrossRef Farrelly C, Delaney H, McDermott R, Malone D (2008) Do all non-calcified echogenic renal lesions found on ultrasound need further evaluation with CT? Abdom Imaging 33:44–47PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Watanabe O et al (1992) Small renal cell carcinoma: pathologic and radiologic correlation. Radiology 184:493–498PubMedCrossRef Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Watanabe O et al (1992) Small renal cell carcinoma: pathologic and radiologic correlation. Radiology 184:493–498PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bosniak MA, Birnbaum BA, Krinsky GA, Waisman J (1995) Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. Radiology 197:589–597PubMedCrossRef Bosniak MA, Birnbaum BA, Krinsky GA, Waisman J (1995) Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. Radiology 197:589–597PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wong JA, Rendon RA (2007) Progression to metastatic disease from a small renal cell carcinoma prospectively followed with an active surveillance protocol. Can Urol Assoc J 1:120–122PubMedPubMedCentral Wong JA, Rendon RA (2007) Progression to metastatic disease from a small renal cell carcinoma prospectively followed with an active surveillance protocol. Can Urol Assoc J 1:120–122PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Schuster TG, Ferguson MR, Baker DE, Schaldenbrand JD, Solomon MH (2004) Papillary renal cell carcinoma containing fat without calcification mimicking angiomyolipoma on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1402–1404PubMedCrossRef Schuster TG, Ferguson MR, Baker DE, Schaldenbrand JD, Solomon MH (2004) Papillary renal cell carcinoma containing fat without calcification mimicking angiomyolipoma on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1402–1404PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Simpson E, Patel U (2006) Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest < or = −10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or = −10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds. Clin Radiol 61:410–416PubMedCrossRef Simpson E, Patel U (2006) Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest < or = −10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or = −10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds. Clin Radiol 61:410–416PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1868–1872PubMedCrossRef Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1868–1872PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Burdeny DA, Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Reinhold C, Ascher SM (1997) Small (<1.5 cm) angiomyolipomas of the kidney: characterization by the combined use of in-phase and fat-attenuated MR techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 15:141–145PubMedCrossRef Burdeny DA, Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Reinhold C, Ascher SM (1997) Small (<1.5 cm) angiomyolipomas of the kidney: characterization by the combined use of in-phase and fat-attenuated MR techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 15:141–145PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Earls JP, Krinsky GA (1997) Abdominal and pelvic applications of opposed-phase MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1071–1077PubMedCrossRef Earls JP, Krinsky GA (1997) Abdominal and pelvic applications of opposed-phase MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1071–1077PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Outwater EK, Bhatia M, Siegelman ES, Burke MA, Mitchell DG (1997) Lipid in renal clear cell carcinoma: detection on opposed-phase gradient-echo MR images. Radiology 205:103–107PubMedCrossRef Outwater EK, Bhatia M, Siegelman ES, Burke MA, Mitchell DG (1997) Lipid in renal clear cell carcinoma: detection on opposed-phase gradient-echo MR images. Radiology 205:103–107PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Karlo CA, Donati OF, Burger IA et al (2013) MR imaging of renal cortical tumours: qualitative and quantitative chemical shift imaging parameters. Eur Radiol 23:1738–1744PubMedCrossRef Karlo CA, Donati OF, Burger IA et al (2013) MR imaging of renal cortical tumours: qualitative and quantitative chemical shift imaging parameters. Eur Radiol 23:1738–1744PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kim JK, Kim SH, Jang YJ et al (2006) Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from other neoplasms at double-echo chemical shift FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 239:174–180PubMedCrossRef Kim JK, Kim SH, Jang YJ et al (2006) Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from other neoplasms at double-echo chemical shift FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 239:174–180PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM et al (2012) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology 265:468–477PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM et al (2012) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology 265:468–477PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Small (<1 cm) incidental echogenic renal cortical nodules: chemical shift MRI outperforms CT for confirmatory diagnosis of angiomyolipoma (AML)
Authors
Nicola Schieda
Leonard Avruch
Trevor A. Flood
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 3/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0323-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Insights into Imaging 3/2014 Go to the issue