Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 5/2012

Open Access 01-10-2012 | Pictorial Review

Focal hepatic lesions in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI: the atlas

Authors: José Traila Campos, Claude B. Sirlin, Jin-Young Choi

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This article reviews the different technical aspects and pitfalls of gadolinium (Gd)-ethoxibenzyl (EOB)-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and the advantages of the hepatocellular phase (HCP) and defines its specific imaging features of liver lesions.

Background

Gd-EOB-DTPA is a contrast agent with combined properties of a conventional non-specific extracellular and a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent. Benign cirrhosis-associated nodules are characterised by isointensity in dynamic imaging and the HCP. Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) usually show hyperenhancement in the arterial phase, with washout in the portal vein pressure (PVP) and hypointensity in the HCP. Among other characteristic findings, we have the mosaic pattern, a capsule, the “nodule-in-nodule” appearance and the satellite nodules. The fibrolamellar HCC is a large enhancing heterogeneous lesion, on a non-cirrhotic liver, with a hypointense scar in every sequence. THIDs (transient hepatic intensity differences) are perfusional alterations, characterised by hyperintensity in the arterial phase, with no alterations in the rest of the sequences including the HCP. Adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) are lesions, occurring more frequently in young women, with brisk arterial enhancement, differentiated by the scar and the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in the HCP. Focal eosinophilic infiltration is a difficult diagnosis, with characteristics such as a non-spherical shape and irregular borders suggesting it. Besides these lesions, in which Gd-EOB-DTPA has a clear advantage, there are a few where the specificities of this agent can be troublesome: haemangiomas, focal fat/sparing, foreign body reaction, cholangiocarcinoma and metastases.

Conclusion

Gd-EOB-DTPA is comparable to extracellular agents, and uptake by functioning hepatocytes in the delayed phase provides additional information that further improves detection and characterisation of many hepatic lesions.

Main Messages

  • Gd-EOB-DTPA offers advantages for the imaging of many liver lesions including HCC, fibrolamellar HCC, FNH and adenoma.
  • The properties of Gd-EOB-DTPA can pose problems when dealing with haemangiomas, cholangiocarcinoma and metastases among others.
  • The uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA by functioning hepatocytes in the delayed phase provides additional information that further improves detection and characterisation of many hepatic lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nam K, Suk K, Jun W, Suk HL, Dae H, Gwang HK, Hyung Il S (2009) Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications. Radiographics 29:1707–1724CrossRef Nam K, Suk K, Jun W, Suk HL, Dae H, Gwang HK, Hyung Il S (2009) Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications. Radiographics 29:1707–1724CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 14:559–578PubMedCrossRef Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 14:559–578PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tsuboyama T, Onishi H, Kim T, Akita H, Hori M, Tatsumi M, Nakamoto A, Nagano H, Matsuura N, Wakasa K, Tomoda K (2010) Hepatocellular carcinoma: hepatocyte-selective enhancement at gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR imaging—correlation with expression of sinusoidal and canalicular transporters and bile accumulation. Radiology 255(3):824–833PubMedCrossRef Tsuboyama T, Onishi H, Kim T, Akita H, Hori M, Tatsumi M, Nakamoto A, Nagano H, Matsuura N, Wakasa K, Tomoda K (2010) Hepatocellular carcinoma: hepatocyte-selective enhancement at gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR imaging—correlation with expression of sinusoidal and canalicular transporters and bile accumulation. Radiology 255(3):824–833PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kitao A, Zen Y, Matsui O, Gabata T, Kobayashi S, Koda W, Kozaka K, Yoneda N, Yamashita T, Kaneko S, Nakanuma Y (2010) Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid– enhanced MR imaging—correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features. Radiology 256(3):817–826PubMedCrossRef Kitao A, Zen Y, Matsui O, Gabata T, Kobayashi S, Koda W, Kozaka K, Yoneda N, Yamashita T, Kaneko S, Nakanuma Y (2010) Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid– enhanced MR imaging—correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features. Radiology 256(3):817–826PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary–specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748PubMedCrossRef Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary–specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gandhi SN, Brown MA, Wong JG, Aguirre DA, Sirlin CB (2006) MR contrast agents for liver imaging: what, when, how. Radiographics 26:1621–1636PubMedCrossRef Gandhi SN, Brown MA, Wong JG, Aguirre DA, Sirlin CB (2006) MR contrast agents for liver imaging: what, when, how. Radiographics 26:1621–1636PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sun HY, Lee JM, Shin CI, Lee DH, Moon SK, Kim KW, Han JK, Choi BI (2010) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging. Investig Radiol 45(2):96–103CrossRef Sun HY, Lee JM, Shin CI, Lee DH, Moon SK, Kim KW, Han JK, Choi BI (2010) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging. Investig Radiol 45(2):96–103CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zech CJ, Grazioli L, Breuer J, Reiser M, Schoenberg SO (2008) Diagnostic performance and description of morphological features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: results of a multicenter trial. Investig Radiol 43(7):504–511CrossRef Zech CJ, Grazioli L, Breuer J, Reiser M, Schoenberg SO (2008) Diagnostic performance and description of morphological features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: results of a multicenter trial. Investig Radiol 43(7):504–511CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tajima T, Honda H, Taguchi K et al (2002) Sequential hemodynamic change in hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules: CT angiography and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:885–897PubMedCrossRef Tajima T, Honda H, Taguchi K et al (2002) Sequential hemodynamic change in hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules: CT angiography and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:885–897PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roncalli M, Roz E, Coggi G et al (1999) The vascular profile of regenerative and dysplastic nodules of the cirrhotic liver: implications for diagnosis and classification. Hepatology 30:1174–1178PubMedCrossRef Roncalli M, Roz E, Coggi G et al (1999) The vascular profile of regenerative and dysplastic nodules of the cirrhotic liver: implications for diagnosis and classification. Hepatology 30:1174–1178PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cruite I, Schroeder M, Merkle EM, Sirlin CB (2010) Gadoxetate disodium–enhanced MRI of the liver: part 2, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the cirrhotic liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:29–41PubMedCrossRef Cruite I, Schroeder M, Merkle EM, Sirlin CB (2010) Gadoxetate disodium–enhanced MRI of the liver: part 2, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the cirrhotic liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:29–41PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Choi JY, Lee HC, Yim JH, Shim JH, Lim HS, Shin YM, Yu ES, Suh DJ (2011) Focal nodular hyperplasia or focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions of the liver: a special emphasis on diagnosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(6):1004–1009PubMedCrossRef Choi JY, Lee HC, Yim JH, Shim JH, Lim HS, Shin YM, Yu ES, Suh DJ (2011) Focal nodular hyperplasia or focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions of the liver: a special emphasis on diagnosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(6):1004–1009PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Libbrecht L, Cassiman D, Verslype C, Maleux G, Van Hees D, Pirenne J, Nevens F, Roskams T (2006) Clinicopathological features of focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules in 130 cirrhotic explant livers. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2341–2346PubMedCrossRef Libbrecht L, Cassiman D, Verslype C, Maleux G, Van Hees D, Pirenne J, Nevens F, Roskams T (2006) Clinicopathological features of focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules in 130 cirrhotic explant livers. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2341–2346PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Choi BI, Takayasu K, Han MC (1993) Small hepatocellular carcinoma and associated lesions of the liver: pathology, pathogenesis, imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:1177–1187PubMedCrossRef Choi BI, Takayasu K, Han MC (1993) Small hepatocellular carcinoma and associated lesions of the liver: pathology, pathogenesis, imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:1177–1187PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hanna RF, Aguirre DA, Kased N, Emery SC, Peterson MR, Sirlin CB (2008) Cirrhosis-associated hepatocellular nodules: correlation of histopathologic and MR imaging features. Radiographics 28:747–769PubMedCrossRef Hanna RF, Aguirre DA, Kased N, Emery SC, Peterson MR, Sirlin CB (2008) Cirrhosis-associated hepatocellular nodules: correlation of histopathologic and MR imaging features. Radiographics 28:747–769PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Huppertz A, Haraida S, Kraus A et al (2005) Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT—initial observations. Radiology 234:468–478PubMedCrossRef Huppertz A, Haraida S, Kraus A et al (2005) Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT—initial observations. Radiology 234:468–478PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kim SH (2009) Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1675–1681PubMedCrossRef Kim SH (2009) Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1675–1681PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fujita M, Yamamoto R, Fritz-Zieroth (1996) Contrast enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA in MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice: a comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide. J Magn Reson Imaging 6(3):472–477PubMedCrossRef Fujita M, Yamamoto R, Fritz-Zieroth (1996) Contrast enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA in MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice: a comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide. J Magn Reson Imaging 6(3):472–477PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shimofusa R (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a pictorial review of novel insights into pathophysiological features revealed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 17(5):583–589CrossRef Shimofusa R (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a pictorial review of novel insights into pathophysiological features revealed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 17(5):583–589CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB, Merkle EM (2010) Gadoxetate disodium–enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):13–28PubMedCrossRef Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB, Merkle EM (2010) Gadoxetate disodium–enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):13–28PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ahn JH, Yu JS, Hwang SW, Chung JJ, Kim JH, Kim KW (2010) Nontumourous arterioportal shunts in the liver: CT and MRI findings considering mechanisms and fate. Eur Radiol 20:385–394PubMedCrossRef Ahn JH, Yu JS, Hwang SW, Chung JJ, Kim JH, Kim KW (2010) Nontumourous arterioportal shunts in the liver: CT and MRI findings considering mechanisms and fate. Eur Radiol 20:385–394PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Sano K, Tominaga L, Muhi A, Araki T (2010) Distinguishing hypervascular pseudolesions of the liver from hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 256(1):151–158PubMedCrossRef Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Sano K, Tominaga L, Muhi A, Araki T (2010) Distinguishing hypervascular pseudolesions of the liver from hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 256(1):151–158PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wanless IR, Mawdsley C, Adams R (1985) On the pathogenesis of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Hepatology 5(6):1194–2000PubMedCrossRef Wanless IR, Mawdsley C, Adams R (1985) On the pathogenesis of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Hepatology 5(6):1194–2000PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK (2006) Focal nodular hyperplasia: lesion evaluation using 16-MDCT and 3D CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1587–1596PubMedCrossRef Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK (2006) Focal nodular hyperplasia: lesion evaluation using 16-MDCT and 3D CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1587–1596PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Grazioli L, Morana G, Federle MP et al (2001) Focal nodular hyperplasia: morphologic and functional information from MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine. Radiology 221:731–739PubMedCrossRef Grazioli L, Morana G, Federle MP et al (2001) Focal nodular hyperplasia: morphologic and functional information from MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine. Radiology 221:731–739PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Vullierme MP, Lagalla R, Midiri M, Vilgrain V (2006) CT and MR imaging evaluation of hepatic adenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(5):745–750PubMedCrossRef Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Vullierme MP, Lagalla R, Midiri M, Vilgrain V (2006) CT and MR imaging evaluation of hepatic adenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(5):745–750PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Nalesnik M (2000) Hepatocellular adenoma: multiphasic CT and histopathologic findings in 25 patients. Radiology 214(3):861–868PubMedCrossRef Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Nalesnik M (2000) Hepatocellular adenoma: multiphasic CT and histopathologic findings in 25 patients. Radiology 214(3):861–868PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hur J, Park M, Yu J, Lim J, Hong SW, Kim KW (2005) Focal eosinophilic necrosis versus metastasis in the liver: the usefulness of two-phase dynamic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1541–1548CrossRef Hur J, Park M, Yu J, Lim J, Hong SW, Kim KW (2005) Focal eosinophilic necrosis versus metastasis in the liver: the usefulness of two-phase dynamic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1541–1548CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kim Y, Kim C, Moon W, Cho B, Lee, Lee JM (2005) MRI findings of focal eosinophilic liver diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1541–1548PubMedCrossRef Kim Y, Kim C, Moon W, Cho B, Lee, Lee JM (2005) MRI findings of focal eosinophilic liver diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1541–1548PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Doo KW, Lee CH, Choi JW, Lee J, Kim KA, Park CM (2009) “Pseudo washout” sign in high-flow hepatic hemangioma on gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI mimicking hypervascular tumour. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W490–W496PubMedCrossRef Doo KW, Lee CH, Choi JW, Lee J, Kim KA, Park CM (2009) “Pseudo washout” sign in high-flow hepatic hemangioma on gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI mimicking hypervascular tumour. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W490–W496PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Anderson SW, Kruskal JB, Kane RA (2009) Benign hepatic tumours and iatrogenic pseudotumours. Radiographics 29:211–229PubMedCrossRef Anderson SW, Kruskal JB, Kane RA (2009) Benign hepatic tumours and iatrogenic pseudotumours. Radiographics 29:211–229PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Martin DR, Balci C, Lance T (2001) Focal liver lesions: comparison of dual-phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(3):397–401PubMedCrossRef Semelka RC, Martin DR, Balci C, Lance T (2001) Focal liver lesions: comparison of dual-phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(3):397–401PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hussain SM, Zondervan PE, IJzermans JN, Schalm SW, Man RA, Krestin GP (2002) Benign versus malignant hepatic nodules: MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 22:1023–1039PubMedCrossRef Hussain SM, Zondervan PE, IJzermans JN, Schalm SW, Man RA, Krestin GP (2002) Benign versus malignant hepatic nodules: MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 22:1023–1039PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Focal hepatic lesions in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI: the atlas
Authors
José Traila Campos
Claude B. Sirlin
Jin-Young Choi
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 5/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0179-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Insights into Imaging 5/2012 Go to the issue