Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 5/2011

Open Access 01-10-2011 | Original Article

How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey

Authors: Jan M. L. Bosmans, Lieve Peremans, Arthur M. De Schepper, Philippe O. Duyck, Paul M. Parizel

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved.

Methods

At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and general practitioners were able to freely enter suggestions with regard to improving the quality of the report. These suggestions were isolated from the quantitative results. Subjects and themes were identified, examined, ordered, counted, compared and analysed.

Results

Of a total of 3,884 invitations to participate, we received 735 response forms from clinicians (18.9%), 233 (31.7%) of which contained suggestions. Issues mentioned most frequently were the need for clinical information and a clinical question, for a conclusion, structuring, communicating directly with the clinician, completeness, integrating images or referring to images, mentioning relevant findings outside of the clinical question, mentioning a diagnosis or suitable differential diagnosis, and concise reporting.

Conclusion

Although these spontaneous suggestions are erratic and sometimes contradictory, they summarise the ideas as well as the emotions of these clients of the radiology department. Therefore it is advisable to take them into account when developing new ways of reporting.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Mullins ME, Lev MH, Schellingerhout D, Koroshetz WJ, Gonzalez RG (2002) Influence of the availability of clinical history on detection of early stroke using unenhanced CT and diffusionweighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:223–228PubMedCrossRef Mullins ME, Lev MH, Schellingerhout D, Koroshetz WJ, Gonzalez RG (2002) Influence of the availability of clinical history on detection of early stroke using unenhanced CT and diffusionweighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:223–228PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leslie A, Jones AJ, Goddard PR (2000) The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists. Br J Radiol 73:1052–1055PubMedCrossRef Leslie A, Jones AJ, Goddard PR (2000) The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists. Br J Radiol 73:1052–1055PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lehnert BE, Bree RL (2010) Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support? J Am Coll Radiol 7:192–197PubMedCrossRef Lehnert BE, Bree RL (2010) Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support? J Am Coll Radiol 7:192–197PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference [No authors listed] (2011) Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2011) Insights Imaging 2:93–96. doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0066-7 [No authors listed] (2011) Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2011) Insights Imaging 2:93–96. doi:10.​1007/​s13244-011-0066-7
9.
go back to reference Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR (2001) Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:591–598PubMedCrossRef Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR (2001) Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:591–598PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH (2009) Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol 64(386–394):395–396 Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH (2009) Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol 64(386–394):395–396
12.
go back to reference Grigg ERN (1965) The trail of the invisible light. Thomas, Springfield, IL Grigg ERN (1965) The trail of the invisible light. Thomas, Springfield, IL
13.
go back to reference Clinger NJ, Hunter TB, Hillman BJ (1988) Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians. Radiology 169:825–826PubMedCrossRef Clinger NJ, Hunter TB, Hillman BJ (1988) Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians. Radiology 169:825–826PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gunderman R, Ambrosius WT, Cohen M (2000) Radiology reporting in an academic children's hospital: what referring physicians think. Pediatr Radiol 30:307–314PubMedCrossRef Gunderman R, Ambrosius WT, Cohen M (2000) Radiology reporting in an academic children's hospital: what referring physicians think. Pediatr Radiol 30:307–314PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey
Authors
Jan M. L. Bosmans
Lieve Peremans
Arthur M. De Schepper
Philippe O. Duyck
Paul M. Parizel
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 5/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Insights into Imaging 5/2011 Go to the issue