Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Original Article

Revisiting Post-Sterilization Regret in India

Authors: Gargi Pal, Himanshu Chaurasia

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

This study analyses the socio-demographic characteristics associated with post-sterilization regret.

Study Design

The study uses cross-sectional data from the fourth round of National Family Health Surveys (2015–2016).

Methods

Simple bivariate and binary logistic regressions analyses were used.

Results

Research shows that 7% of women aged 15–49 reported sterilization regret, which increased by 2% from 2005 to 2016. It was found that factors significantly associated with sterilization regret were years since sterilization, child loss experience, regions of residence, and quality of services. Women who got sterilized at the age of 30 or more were more likely to express regret, than women who were sterilised before 25 years of age, when adjusted for confounding variables (aO.R= 1.006). Women having sons were less likely to report sterilization regret than women who had only daughters (aO.R.=1.3 for each) but on the contrary women having both son and daughter are significantly less likely to express regret in comparison with women having only sons (aO.R. = 0.8 for each. Women who had experienced child loss had higher odds of reporting sterilization regret in rural (aO.R =1.2) as well as in urban (aO.R = 1.3) areas respectively, compared to those who did not experience any child loss.

Conclusion

Women need to be counselled about the permanent nature of sterilization in order to avoid future regret as sterilization is largely dominated by socio-economic conditions. Thus, couples’ decision-making towards using the contraceptive from the basket of choice would help in uplifting the social and cultural status of women in conservative societies and will have a positive effect on contraceptive use. In addition, efforts should be made to educate both the partners equally about contraceptive methods that have higher efficiency. Further, there is also a need to improve the quality of services, both in terms of counselling and service provision. Lastly, health-related policies should tackle disparities in the empowerment, and economic status of women that would result in decreased post-sterilization regret, and will improve sexual relationships following sterilization.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nervo P, Bawin L, Foidart JM, et al. Regret after tubal sterilization. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000;29:485–91. Nervo P, Bawin L, Foidart JM, et al. Regret after tubal sterilization. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000;29:485–91.
3.
go back to reference Schmidt JE, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, et al. Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:892–8.CrossRef Schmidt JE, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, et al. Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:892–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Visaria L, Jejeebhoy S, Merrick T. From family planning to reproductive health: challenges facing India. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1999;25:S44–9.CrossRef Visaria L, Jejeebhoy S, Merrick T. From family planning to reproductive health: challenges facing India. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1999;25:S44–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Srinivasan K. Regulating reproduction in India’s population: efforts, results, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1995. Srinivasan K. Regulating reproduction in India’s population: efforts, results, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1995.
6.
go back to reference Srinivasan K. Population and family planning programmes in India: a review and recommendations. In: Lect 5th Dr C Chandrasekaran Meml Lect Ser Febr. 2006;3. Srinivasan K. Population and family planning programmes in India: a review and recommendations. In: Lect 5th Dr C Chandrasekaran Meml Lect Ser Febr. 2006;3.
7.
go back to reference Jamieson D. Poststerilization regret: findings from India and the United States. Indian J Med Sci. 2007;61:359–60.CrossRef Jamieson D. Poststerilization regret: findings from India and the United States. Indian J Med Sci. 2007;61:359–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Malhotra N, Chanana C, Garg P. Post-sterilization regrets in Indian women. Indian J Med Sci. 2007;61:186–91.CrossRef Malhotra N, Chanana C, Garg P. Post-sterilization regrets in Indian women. Indian J Med Sci. 2007;61:186–91.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ludermir AB, Machado KMdM, da Costa AM, et al. Tubal ligation regret and related risk factors: findings from a case-control study in Pernambuco State, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25:1361–8.CrossRef Ludermir AB, Machado KMdM, da Costa AM, et al. Tubal ligation regret and related risk factors: findings from a case-control study in Pernambuco State, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25:1361–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Singh A, Ogollah R, Ram F, et al. Sterilization regret among married women in India: implications for the Indian national family planning program. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38:187.CrossRef Singh A, Ogollah R, Ram F, et al. Sterilization regret among married women in India: implications for the Indian national family planning program. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38:187.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eeckhaut MC, Sweeney MM. The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis) advantage in ten low-fertility countries. Popul Stud. 2016;70:39–58.CrossRef Eeckhaut MC, Sweeney MM. The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis) advantage in ten low-fertility countries. Popul Stud. 2016;70:39–58.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dhungana A, Nanthamongkolchai S, Pitikultang S. Factors related to intention to undergo female sterilization among married women in Rural Kathmandu, Nepal. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2016;6:539.CrossRef Dhungana A, Nanthamongkolchai S, Pitikultang S. Factors related to intention to undergo female sterilization among married women in Rural Kathmandu, Nepal. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2016;6:539.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pallikadavath S, Rajan SI, Wilson C. Impact of low fertility and early age at sterilisation on women’s formal education and skill development in South India. J Popul Res. 2016;33:199–220.CrossRef Pallikadavath S, Rajan SI, Wilson C. Impact of low fertility and early age at sterilisation on women’s formal education and skill development in South India. J Popul Res. 2016;33:199–220.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pallikadavath S, Wilson C. A paradox within a paradox: scheduled caste fertility in Kerala. Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40:3085–93. Pallikadavath S, Wilson C. A paradox within a paradox: scheduled caste fertility in Kerala. Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40:3085–93.
15.
go back to reference Sample registration system statistical report 2016. Registrar General, India; 2016. Sample registration system statistical report 2016. Registrar General, India; 2016.
16.
go back to reference De Oliveira IT, Dias JG, Padmadas SS. Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86654.CrossRef De Oliveira IT, Dias JG, Padmadas SS. Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86654.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Herrmann ES. Incentives to promote family planning. Prev Med. 2012;55:S106–12.CrossRef Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Herrmann ES. Incentives to promote family planning. Prev Med. 2012;55:S106–12.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Leone T, Padmadas SS. The proliferation of female sterilization in Brazil and India A comparative analysis of the cohort and parity effects. Genus. 2007;LXIII:77–97. Leone T, Padmadas SS. The proliferation of female sterilization in Brazil and India A comparative analysis of the cohort and parity effects. Genus. 2007;LXIII:77–97.
19.
go back to reference Matthews Z, Padmadas S, Hutter I, et al. Does early childbearing and a sterilization-focused family planning programme in India fuel population growth? Demogr Res. 2009;20:693–720.CrossRef Matthews Z, Padmadas S, Hutter I, et al. Does early childbearing and a sterilization-focused family planning programme in India fuel population growth? Demogr Res. 2009;20:693–720.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lipetz C, Phillips CJ, Fleming CF. The cost-effectiveness of a long-acting reversible contraceptive (Implanon®) relative to oral contraception in a community setting. Contraception. 2009;79:304–9.CrossRef Lipetz C, Phillips CJ, Fleming CF. The cost-effectiveness of a long-acting reversible contraceptive (Implanon®) relative to oral contraception in a community setting. Contraception. 2009;79:304–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mavranezouli I. The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1338–45.CrossRef Mavranezouli I. The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1338–45.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Trussell J, Hassan F, Lowin J, et al. Achieving cost-neutrality with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2015;91:49–56.CrossRef Trussell J, Hassan F, Lowin J, et al. Achieving cost-neutrality with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2015;91:49–56.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Revisiting Post-Sterilization Regret in India
Authors
Gargi Pal
Himanshu Chaurasia
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01309-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2020 Go to the issue