Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 3/2019

01-06-2019 | Original Article

Incarcerated and Transmigrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Managed at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of East Delhi: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis

Authors: Richa Sharma, MS, Amita Suneja

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of the Study

Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception having least number of complications. We aimed to find the incidence, risk factors and the management done for incarcerated and transmigrated intrauterine contraceptive devices at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital during past 5 years.

Methods

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of 5 years (January 2013–December 2017) was done, and the case records from Medical Record Department and Family Planning Unit of our institution were analysed.

Results

Total number of IUCD insertions done in last 5 years (from January 2013 to December 2017) in our institution was 4557. Misplaced IUCDs requiring surgical interventions were 71 (1.6%) out of which 63 (88.7%) were incomplete perforations or embedded and 8 (11.3%) were complete perforations or transmigrated IUCDs. Transmigration sites were omentum, uterovesical fold, mesentery and bladder. Laparotomy was needed in 4 (5.6%), and 2 (2.8%) needed each laparoscopy and cystoscopy. Main risk factors identified were postpartum previous on or two caesarean sections, low parity, grade of operator and IUCD and uterocervical length discrepancy.

Conclusion

The risk of perforation should not be a reason to defer IUCD insertion and every effort should be made to bring down its failure and complication rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):184–96.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):184–96.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goldstuck N. Assessment of uterine cavity size and shape: a systematic review addressing relevance to intrauterine procedures and events. Afr J Reprod Health. 2012;16(3):130–9.PubMed Goldstuck N. Assessment of uterine cavity size and shape: a systematic review addressing relevance to intrauterine procedures and events. Afr J Reprod Health. 2012;16(3):130–9.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Goldstuck ND, Wildemeersch D. Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion. Int J Health. 2014;6:735–44. Goldstuck ND, Wildemeersch D. Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion. Int J Health. 2014;6:735–44.
4.
go back to reference Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, et al. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015;91:274–9.CrossRefPubMed Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, et al. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015;91:274–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:811–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:811–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell HD. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Acess J Contracept. 2016;7:19–32.CrossRef Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell HD. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Acess J Contracept. 2016;7:19–32.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Varun N, Nigam A, Gupta N. Misplaced IUCD: a case report. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(11):5155–7.CrossRef Varun N, Nigam A, Gupta N. Misplaced IUCD: a case report. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(11):5155–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kumar H, Sharma P, Aggarwal B. Migrated intrauterine contraceptive device: erosion into sigmoid colon. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6(5):1828–30.CrossRef Kumar H, Sharma P, Aggarwal B. Migrated intrauterine contraceptive device: erosion into sigmoid colon. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6(5):1828–30.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goyal S, Goyal S. Displaced intrauterine device: a retrospective study. J Med Res. 2016;2(2):41–3. Goyal S, Goyal S. Displaced intrauterine device: a retrospective study. J Med Res. 2016;2(2):41–3.
10.
go back to reference Armo M, Minj IB, Triki AR, et al. Copper T (380 A) and risk of uterine perforation in lactating women: rural scenario. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(7):3026–9.CrossRef Armo M, Minj IB, Triki AR, et al. Copper T (380 A) and risk of uterine perforation in lactating women: rural scenario. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(7):3026–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Braaten KP, Benson CB, Maurer R, et al. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1014–20.CrossRefPubMed Braaten KP, Benson CB, Maurer R, et al. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1014–20.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference IUCD Reference Manual for Medical Officers and Nursing Personnel September 2013. Family Planning Division Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India. IUCD Reference Manual for Medical Officers and Nursing Personnel September 2013. Family Planning Division Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India.
Metadata
Title
Incarcerated and Transmigrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Managed at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of East Delhi: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis
Authors
Richa Sharma, MS
Amita Suneja
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1159-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 3/2019 Go to the issue