Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Article

Umbilical Coiling Index Assessment During Routine Fetal Anatomic Survey: A Screening Tool for Fetuses at Risk

Authors: Richa Sharma, Gita Radhakrishnan, Smita Manchanda, Shilpa Singh

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The umbilical cord is the lifeline of the foetus as it supplies water, nutrients, and oxygen. Protection of these blood vessels is needed and provided by Wharton’s Jelly, amniotic fluid and the helical pattern, or coiling, of the umbilical cord vessels.

Aim

To establish the relationship between antenatal umbilical cord coiling index (aUCI) measured at 18–20 weeks along with level II USG and adverse perinatal outcomes.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 408 antenatal women, enrolled at the time of fetal anatomic survey, and their cord coiling index (aUCI) was measured, and its association with perinatal outcomes was observed. Umbilical coiling index was classified as Hypocoiled if UCI <10th percentile, hypercoiled >90th percentile, normocoiled between 10th and 90th percentile.

Results

408 antenatal women were enrolled for the study. Mean aUCI was 0.43 ± 0.30 (normocoiled group), 0.18 ± 0.4 (hypocoiled), and 0.53 ± 0.05 (hypercoiled group). The average gestational age at delivery in hypocoiled group was 36.8 ± 2.34 weeks, and it was shorter than 38.3 ± 1.82 weeks of the normocoiled group and 38.9 ± 1.72 weeks of the hypercoiled group. Mean birth weight observed was 2055 ± 744 (hypocoiled group), 3049 ± 564 (hypercoiled), and 3102 ± 564 (normocoiled) p < 0.001. Preterm births 52 (59%) and low birth weight 76 (69%) were significantly associated with hypocoiling.

Conclusion

Abnormal umbilical cord coiling index, detected at the fetal ultrasound anatomic survey in the second trimester (18–20 weeks), can be used potentially as a screening or as a predictive tool for adverse antenatal or perinatal events.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sharma B, Bhardwaj N, Gupta S et al. Association of umbilical coiling index by colour Doppler ultrasonography at 18 to 22 weeks of gestation and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2012;62(6):650–4.CrossRef Sharma B, Bhardwaj N, Gupta S et al. Association of umbilical coiling index by colour Doppler ultrasonography at 18 to 22 weeks of gestation and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2012;62(6):650–4.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Muckle C, Feinberg E. Developmental abnormalities of the female reproductive organs. Glob Libr Women’s Med. (ISSN: 1756-2228) 2008; doi:10.3843/GLOWM.10002. Muckle C, Feinberg E. Developmental abnormalities of the female reproductive organs. Glob Libr Women’s Med. (ISSN: 1756-2228) 2008; doi:10.​3843/​GLOWM.​10002.
3.
go back to reference De Laat MW, Nikkels PG, Franx A, Visser GH. The roach muscle bundle and umbilical cord coiling. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83:571–4.CrossRefPubMed De Laat MW, Nikkels PG, Franx A, Visser GH. The roach muscle bundle and umbilical cord coiling. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83:571–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Diwakar RK, Naik MM, Jindal MM. Umbilical cord coiling: case report and review of literature. BJR Case Rep. 2016;2:20150152. Diwakar RK, Naik MM, Jindal MM. Umbilical cord coiling: case report and review of literature. BJR Case Rep. 2016;2:20150152.
5.
go back to reference Proctor LK, Fitzgerald B, Whittle WL, et al. Umbilical cord diameter percentile curves and their correlation to birth weight and placental pathology. Placenta. 2013;34(1):62–6.CrossRefPubMed Proctor LK, Fitzgerald B, Whittle WL, et al. Umbilical cord diameter percentile curves and their correlation to birth weight and placental pathology. Placenta. 2013;34(1):62–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Abdulrasul EA. Umbilical coiling index as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Adv Res. 2014;2:101–7. Abdulrasul EA. Umbilical coiling index as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Adv Res. 2014;2:101–7.
7.
go back to reference Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012; 2012. Article ID 213689. doi:10.1155/2012/213689. Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012; 2012. Article ID 213689. doi:10.​1155/​2012/​213689.
8.
go back to reference Sebire NJ. Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:804–6.CrossRefPubMed Sebire NJ. Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:804–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clerici G, Antonelli C, Rizzo G, Kanninen TT, Di Renzo GC. Atypical hemodynamic pattern in fetuses with hypercoiled umbilical cord and growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(6):558–62.CrossRefPubMed Clerici G, Antonelli C, Rizzo G, Kanninen TT, Di Renzo GC. Atypical hemodynamic pattern in fetuses with hypercoiled umbilical cord and growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(6):558–62.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Committee on practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin No. 98. Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 951–61. American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Committee on practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin No. 98. Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 951–61.
11.
go back to reference Jo YS, Jang DK, Lee G. The sonographic umbilical cord coiling in late second trimester of gestation and perinatal outcomes. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8(7):594–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jo YS, Jang DK, Lee G. The sonographic umbilical cord coiling in late second trimester of gestation and perinatal outcomes. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8(7):594–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Mittal A, Nanda S, Sen J. Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:763–8.CrossRefPubMed Mittal A, Nanda S, Sen J. Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:763–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tahmasebi M, Alighambari R. Evaluation of umbilical cord thickness, cross sectional area, and coiling index as predictors of pregnancy outcome. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011;21:195–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tahmasebi M, Alighambari R. Evaluation of umbilical cord thickness, cross sectional area, and coiling index as predictors of pregnancy outcome. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011;21:195–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Goynumer G, Ozdemir A, Wetherilt L, Durukan B, Yayla M. Umbilical cord thickness in the first and early second trimester and perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:523–6.CrossRefPubMed Goynumer G, Ozdemir A, Wetherilt L, Durukan B, Yayla M. Umbilical cord thickness in the first and early second trimester and perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:523–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Umbilical Coiling Index Assessment During Routine Fetal Anatomic Survey: A Screening Tool for Fetuses at Risk
Authors
Richa Sharma
Gita Radhakrishnan
Smita Manchanda
Shilpa Singh
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1046-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 5/2018 Go to the issue