Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Admission Cardiotocography: A Predictor of Neonatal Outcome

Authors: Vishnu Bhartiya, Richa Sharma, Anand Kumar, Himsweta Srivastava

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Special Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Screening for fetal distress is a big challenge for obstetricians. Labor admission test by cardiotocography (CTG) can be utilized to differentiate between mothers, in whom continuous fetal monitoring is needed and those who can be managed by intermittent auscultation. Admission CTG is commonly used screening test which aims to identify on admission to the delivery unit the fetus at increased risk of intrapartum hypoxia. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of CTG in low- and high-risk women.

Methods

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 200 low-risk and high-risk antenatal women, beyond 32-week gestation with live pregnancy in labor and admitted in labor ward.

Results

Correlation of labor admission test with meconium in low risk and high risk was found statistically significant (p = 0.0010 and p = 0.000046, respectively). Correlation of labor admission test with low Apgar score, NICU admission and mortality was found statistically insignificant in low-risk and high-risk groups.

Conclusion

Admission CTG does not benefit the neonatal outcome in normal- or low-risk women and rather results in increased obstetric intervention. Thus, it is not beneficial as a screening test to detect intrapartum fetal distress in normal- or low-risk women.
Literature
1.
go back to reference NICE. Inherited clinical guideline C. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2001. NICE. Inherited clinical guideline C. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2001.
2.
go back to reference Smith JH. Obstetrics in the 1990s; Current controversies. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1992. p. 192–201. Smith JH. Obstetrics in the 1990s; Current controversies. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1992. p. 192–201.
3.
go back to reference Schifrin BS, Amsel J, Burdof G. The accuracy of auscultation detection of fetal cardiac deceleration: a computer simulation. Am J Obstet Gnaecol. 1992;166:566–76.CrossRef Schifrin BS, Amsel J, Burdof G. The accuracy of auscultation detection of fetal cardiac deceleration: a computer simulation. Am J Obstet Gnaecol. 1992;166:566–76.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chaudhari KR, Pai SS. Admission test for screening labor. Hyderabad in: A comparative study by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories; 2009. Chaudhari KR, Pai SS. Admission test for screening labor. Hyderabad in: A comparative study by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories; 2009.
5.
go back to reference Mires G, Williams F, Howie P. Randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labor in low risk obstetric population. BMJ. 2001;322:1457–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mires G, Williams F, Howie P. Randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labor in low risk obstetric population. BMJ. 2001;322:1457–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Impey L, Reynolds M, MacQuillan K, et al. Admission cardiotocography: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):465.CrossRefPubMed Impey L, Reynolds M, MacQuillan K, et al. Admission cardiotocography: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):465.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mahomed K, Nyoni M, Lambo T, et al. Intra-partum fetal heart rate monitoring continuous electronic versus intermittent Doppler: a randomized controlled trial. Cent Afr J Med. 1992;38(12):458.PubMed Mahomed K, Nyoni M, Lambo T, et al. Intra-partum fetal heart rate monitoring continuous electronic versus intermittent Doppler: a randomized controlled trial. Cent Afr J Med. 1992;38(12):458.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Haverkamp AD, Thompson HE, McFee JG, et al. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125(3):310–20.CrossRefPubMed Haverkamp AD, Thompson HE, McFee JG, et al. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125(3):310–20.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cruzen P, Bekir JS, McLintock DG, et al. Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby’s condition at birth. Br Med J. 1984;289(6455):1345–7.CrossRef Cruzen P, Bekir JS, McLintock DG, et al. Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby’s condition at birth. Br Med J. 1984;289(6455):1345–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ingemarsson I, Arulkumuran S, Ingemarsson E, et al. A screening test for fetal distress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:800–6. Ingemarsson I, Arulkumuran S, Ingemarsson E, et al. A screening test for fetal distress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:800–6.
11.
go back to reference Ducey J, Guzman E, Schulman H, et al. Value of screening fetal heart rate tracing in the latent phase of labor. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:899–900.PubMed Ducey J, Guzman E, Schulman H, et al. Value of screening fetal heart rate tracing in the latent phase of labor. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:899–900.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Capt GP, Sandhu GS, Raju R, et al. Admission cardiotocography screening of high risk obstetric patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2004;64(1):43–5. Capt GP, Sandhu GS, Raju R, et al. Admission cardiotocography screening of high risk obstetric patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2004;64(1):43–5.
13.
go back to reference Sandhu GS, Raju R, Bhattacharyya TK, et al. Admission cardiotocography screening of high risk obstetric patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2008;64(1):43–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sandhu GS, Raju R, Bhattacharyya TK, et al. Admission cardiotocography screening of high risk obstetric patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2008;64(1):43–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Kansal R, Goel G, Mangala D, et al. Correlation of admission test with neonatal outcome. People’s J Sci Res. 2014;7:27–31. Kansal R, Goel G, Mangala D, et al. Correlation of admission test with neonatal outcome. People’s J Sci Res. 2014;7:27–31.
15.
go back to reference Bhangdiya S, Dadhe K, Khatod L. Labor admission test (cardiotocography) as intrapartum risk screening test and its efficacy to predict fetal outcome. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2015;16(2):459–62. Bhangdiya S, Dadhe K, Khatod L. Labor admission test (cardiotocography) as intrapartum risk screening test and its efficacy to predict fetal outcome. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2015;16(2):459–62.
16.
go back to reference Rajalekshmi M, Jayakrishnan C, Nithya R, et al. Admission cardiotocography as a screening test to predict foetal outcome and mode of delivery. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;3(1):43–50.CrossRef Rajalekshmi M, Jayakrishnan C, Nithya R, et al. Admission cardiotocography as a screening test to predict foetal outcome and mode of delivery. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;3(1):43–50.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Admission Cardiotocography: A Predictor of Neonatal Outcome
Authors
Vishnu Bhartiya
Richa Sharma
Anand Kumar
Himsweta Srivastava
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue Special Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0912-0

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016 Go to the issue