Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 5/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Risks and Benefits of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and the Effect of Learning Curve on Them

Authors: Poonam Agarwal, Neeta Bindal, Reena Yadav

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Study objective

The objective of this study was to prospectively analyze the risks and benefits of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and the effects of learning curve on them over 4 years (March 2010–April 2014).

Design

It was a prospective randomized study.

Setting

The study was conducted in Delhi government hospital which had no staff with previous experience of advanced laparoscopic surgeries.

Patients

Two hundred fifty patients were operated on for benign gynecological conditions (35–65 years). The numbers of cases operated laparoscopically were as follows—22 in 2010, 25 in 2011, 32 in 2012, and 46 in 2013. Equal number. of patients operated by open surgery were taken in the study during the same time period.

Results

Two hundred fifty cases were operated since March 2010, by either laparoscopic or open surgery. Incidence of major complications was—1.6 % for TLH compared to 4 % in TAH. After the first year of surgery, this incidence has fallen to 0 % in subsequent years in TLH group. The incidence of minor complications declined from 14 to 4.5 % in the third year of study. Total rate of conversion to laparotomy was 9.7 %, which again had a significant decline after the first year. TLH also clearly showed superior benefits of less intraoperative blood loss, early postoperative ambulance, and shorter period of hospital stay in comparison with TAH.

Conclusion

The study has led us to conclude that TLH is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique after the completion of a period of training necessary to standardize the procedure. This approach must be established in our real, day-to-day clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ren TLC, Kannaiah K. A review of clinical benefits of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. Sungai Petani: Hospital sultan Abdul Halim; 2010. Ren TLC, Kannaiah K. A review of clinical benefits of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. Sungai Petani: Hospital sultan Abdul Halim; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Baek JW, Gong DS, Lee GH. A comparative study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48(6):1490–6. Baek JW, Gong DS, Lee GH. A comparative study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48(6):1490–6.
3.
go back to reference Sutasanasuang S. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Med Assoc Thail. 2011;94(1):8–16. Sutasanasuang S. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Med Assoc Thail. 2011;94(1):8–16.
4.
go back to reference Persson P, Wijma K, Hammar M, et al. Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised controlled multicentre study. BJOG. 2006;113(9):1023–30.CrossRef Persson P, Wijma K, Hammar M, et al. Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised controlled multicentre study. BJOG. 2006;113(9):1023–30.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(12):2996–9.CrossRef Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(12):2996–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Siren PH, Sjoberg J. Evaluation and the learning curve of the first 100 laparoscopic hysterectomies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74:638–41.CrossRef Siren PH, Sjoberg J. Evaluation and the learning curve of the first 100 laparoscopic hysterectomies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74:638–41.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chaperon C, Querleu D, Bruhat M, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:867–72.CrossRef Chaperon C, Querleu D, Bruhat M, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:867–72.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risks and Benefits of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and the Effect of Learning Curve on Them
Authors
Poonam Agarwal
Neeta Bindal
Reena Yadav
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0706-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 5/2016 Go to the issue