Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Review Article

The Multiple Birth Epidemic: Revisited

Authors: Sarit Avraham, Daniel S. Seidman

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The modern era of infertility treatment was heralded over half a century ago with the introduction of new hormonal drugs that could effectively induce ovarian ovulation. However, it was quickly recognized that the birth of these new “miracle drugs” was associated with a remarkable increase in the incidence of high-order multiple births. Despite the fantastic improvement in our ability to monitor ovarian response during ovulation induction, and our power to control the number of embryos introduced into the womb through IVF, multiple births remain a leading cause of long-term child morbidity among infertility patients. Efforts to prevent what was coined in the 1960s as the “multiple birth epidemic” remain an urgent concern. A new body of research clearly points at our capacity to reduce the risk of multiple births and their associated long term morbidity without diminishing current high success rates of infertility treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lunenfeld B. Historical perspectives in gonadotropin therapy. Hum Reprod. 2004;10:453–67.CrossRef Lunenfeld B. Historical perspectives in gonadotropin therapy. Hum Reprod. 2004;10:453–67.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Beall SA, Decherney A. History and challenges surrounding ovarian stimulation in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:795–801.PubMedCrossRef Beall SA, Decherney A. History and challenges surrounding ovarian stimulation in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:795–801.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington KJ. The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011;159:409–13.PubMedCrossRef Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington KJ. The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011;159:409–13.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS data brief, no 80. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS data brief, no 80. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
5.
go back to reference Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239–49.PubMedCrossRef Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239–49.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ooki S. Estimation of the contribution of assisted and non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatments to multiple births during the past 30 years in Japan: 1979–2008. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14:476–83.CrossRef Ooki S. Estimation of the contribution of assisted and non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatments to multiple births during the past 30 years in Japan: 1979–2008. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14:476–83.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28:220–50.PubMed Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28:220–50.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Birth outcomes after spontaneous or assisted conception among infertile Australian women aged 28 to 36 years: a prospective, population-based study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:630–8.PubMedCrossRef Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Birth outcomes after spontaneous or assisted conception among infertile Australian women aged 28 to 36 years: a prospective, population-based study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:630–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:105–13.PubMedCrossRef McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:105–13.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roca-de Bes M, Gutierrez-Maldonado J, Gris-Martinez JM. Comparative study of the psychological risks associated with families with multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and without ART. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:170–4. Roca-de Bes M, Gutierrez-Maldonado J, Gris-Martinez JM. Comparative study of the psychological risks associated with families with multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and without ART. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:170–4.
11.
go back to reference Connolly MP, Hoorens S, Chambers GM, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:603–13.PubMedCrossRef Connolly MP, Hoorens S, Chambers GM, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:603–13.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bromer JG, Ata B, Seli M, et al. Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:168–73.PubMedCrossRef Bromer JG, Ata B, Seli M, et al. Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:168–73.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sentilhes L, Audibert F, Dommerques M, et al. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: indications, technical aspects and psychological impact. Presse Med. 2008;37:295–306.PubMedCrossRef Sentilhes L, Audibert F, Dommerques M, et al. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: indications, technical aspects and psychological impact. Presse Med. 2008;37:295–306.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tadin I, Roje D, Banovic I, et al. Fetal reduction in multifetal pregnancy—ethical dilemmas. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:252–8.PubMed Tadin I, Roje D, Banovic I, et al. Fetal reduction in multifetal pregnancy—ethical dilemmas. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:252–8.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.CrossRef Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.PubMedCrossRef Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Grady R, Alavi N, Vale R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:324–31.PubMedCrossRef Grady R, Alavi N, Vale R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:324–31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kato K, Takehara Y, Seqawa T, et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:35.PubMedCrossRef Kato K, Takehara Y, Seqawa T, et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:35.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference McClamrock HD, Jones HW Jr, Adashi EY. Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination at the quarter centennial: implications for the multiple births epidemic. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:802–9.PubMedCrossRef McClamrock HD, Jones HW Jr, Adashi EY. Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination at the quarter centennial: implications for the multiple births epidemic. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:802–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jones CA, Christensen AL, Salihu H, et al. Prediction of individual probabilities of live birth and multiple birth events following in vitro fertilization (IVF): a new outcomes counseling tool for IVF providers and patients using HFEA metrics. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2011;8:3.PubMed Jones CA, Christensen AL, Salihu H, et al. Prediction of individual probabilities of live birth and multiple birth events following in vitro fertilization (IVF): a new outcomes counseling tool for IVF providers and patients using HFEA metrics. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2011;8:3.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005;54:1–24.PubMed Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005;54:1–24.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Reynolds MA, Schieve LA. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:694–700.PubMedCrossRef Reynolds MA, Schieve LA. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:694–700.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–64.CrossRef The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–64.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Min JK, Claman P, Hughes E, et al. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:203–16.CrossRef Min JK, Claman P, Hughes E, et al. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:203–16.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, et al. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–77.PubMed Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, et al. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–77.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1518–9.CrossRef Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1518–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:107–20.PubMedCrossRef Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:107–20.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ata B, Seli E. Economics of assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:183–8.PubMedCrossRef Ata B, Seli E. Economics of assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:183–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomas C, et al. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1632–9.PubMedCrossRef Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomas C, et al. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1632–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bensdorp AJ, Slappendel E, Koks C, et al. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:35.PubMedCrossRef Bensdorp AJ, Slappendel E, Koks C, et al. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:35.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, et al. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or “fertility tourism” on NHS maternity service. BJOG. 2009;116:1520–3.PubMedCrossRef McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, et al. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or “fertility tourism” on NHS maternity service. BJOG. 2009;116:1520–3.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport F, et al. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travelers. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2373–81.PubMedCrossRef Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport F, et al. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travelers. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2373–81.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Storrow RF. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2939–43.PubMedCrossRef Storrow RF. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2939–43.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hopkins L, Labonte R, Runnels V, et al. Medical tourism today: what is the state of existing knowledge? J Public Health Policy. 2010;31:185–98.PubMedCrossRef Hopkins L, Labonte R, Runnels V, et al. Medical tourism today: what is the state of existing knowledge? J Public Health Policy. 2010;31:185–98.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jones HW Jr, Cooke I, Kempers R, et al. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:491.PubMedCrossRef Jones HW Jr, Cooke I, Kempers R, et al. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:491.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Multiple Birth Epidemic: Revisited
Authors
Sarit Avraham
Daniel S. Seidman
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0309-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2012 Go to the issue