Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 1/2021

01-02-2021

Quantitative Assessment of Learning Behaviors for Oncology Providers

Authors: Marie Wood, Thomas J. George, Rami Manochakian, Maura Polansky, Allyson Baer, Anne Grupe, Yu Shyr, Cathy Wang, Leora Horn

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

How health care providers select topics and activities for learning is key to meeting their needs. The goal of this study was to investigate how oncology providers identify knowledge gaps and choose learning activities. An online focus group within a larger longitudinal study was conducted between November 2015 and August 2016. Participants were chosen by convenience and stratified random sampling of diverse types of oncology providers. Providers were asked monthly to identify learning needs, explain how they identified those needs, and describe the learning activity they chose to meet those needs. Thirty-two oncology providers recorded 201 learning needs via online journal entries (mean 6 entries per person). Needs were associated with practice setting and professional role (p < .05). Colleague recommendation predicted learning needs for advanced practice providers (APPs) (p = .003). Patient cases drove > 50% of identified learning needs across groups. Learning activity preferences were associated with practice setting (p < .05). Choice of learning activity was associated with practice setting, professional role, and geographic location. Colleague recommendation was important for APPs (p = .025). Over 75% of learner responses identify convenience and content quality as important factors in choosing an activity. This study represents a quantitative assessment of learning behaviors for oncology providers and shows that identification of learning needs and activity selection differ by provider demographics. Limitations include small size and underrepresentation of some groups. Our findings should be confirmed with larger samples. Future research should focus on assessment of cohort versus individual needs and learning priorities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fletcher SW (2008) Chairman’s summary of the conference. Continuing education in the health professions: improving healthcare through lifelong learning. J Contin Educ Nurs 39(3):112–118CrossRef Fletcher SW (2008) Chairman’s summary of the conference. Continuing education in the health professions: improving healthcare through lifelong learning. J Contin Educ Nurs 39(3):112–118CrossRef
2.
go back to reference McMahon GT (2016) What do I need to learn today?—the evolution of CME. N Engl J Med 374(15):1403–1406CrossRef McMahon GT (2016) What do I need to learn today?—the evolution of CME. N Engl J Med 374(15):1403–1406CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Davis DA, Prescott J, Fordis CM Jr, Greenberg SB, Dewey CM, Brigham T, Lieberman SA, Rockhold RW, Lieff SJ, Tenner TE Jr (2011) Rethinking CME: an imperative for academic medicine and faculty development. Acad Med 86(4):468–473CrossRef Davis DA, Prescott J, Fordis CM Jr, Greenberg SB, Dewey CM, Brigham T, Lieberman SA, Rockhold RW, Lieff SJ, Tenner TE Jr (2011) Rethinking CME: an imperative for academic medicine and faculty development. Acad Med 86(4):468–473CrossRef
4.
go back to reference IOM (2010) Redesigning continuing education in the health professions. Washington DC IOM (2010) Redesigning continuing education in the health professions. Washington DC
5.
go back to reference Sun J, Wei Q, Zhou Y, Wang J, Liu Q, Xu H (2017) A systematic analysis of FDA-approved anticancer drugs. BMC Syst Biol 11(Suppl 5):87CrossRef Sun J, Wei Q, Zhou Y, Wang J, Liu Q, Xu H (2017) A systematic analysis of FDA-approved anticancer drugs. BMC Syst Biol 11(Suppl 5):87CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Zon R, Harvey RD, Schilsky RL (2018) Rationale, opportunities, and reality of biosimilar medications. N Engl J Med 378(21):2036–2044CrossRef Lyman GH, Zon R, Harvey RD, Schilsky RL (2018) Rationale, opportunities, and reality of biosimilar medications. N Engl J Med 378(21):2036–2044CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bennett EE, Blanchard RD, Hinchey KT (2012) AM last page. Applying Knowles’ andragogy to resident teaching. Acad Med 87(1):129CrossRef Bennett EE, Blanchard RD, Hinchey KT (2012) AM last page. Applying Knowles’ andragogy to resident teaching. Acad Med 87(1):129CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Daily JA, Landis BJ (2014) The journey to becoming an adult learner: from dependent to self-directed learning. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(19):2066–2068CrossRef Daily JA, Landis BJ (2014) The journey to becoming an adult learner: from dependent to self-directed learning. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(19):2066–2068CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Campbell C, Silver I, Sherbino J, Cate OT, Holmboe ES (2010) Competency-based continuing professional development. Med Teach 32(8):657–662CrossRef Campbell C, Silver I, Sherbino J, Cate OT, Holmboe ES (2010) Competency-based continuing professional development. Med Teach 32(8):657–662CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Varkey P, Prokop LJ, Murad AL (2010) The effectiveness of self-directed learning in health professions education: a systematic review. Med Educ 44(11):1057–1068CrossRef Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Varkey P, Prokop LJ, Murad AL (2010) The effectiveness of self-directed learning in health professions education: a systematic review. Med Educ 44(11):1057–1068CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schumacher DJ, Englander R, Carraccio C (2013) Developing the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environment. Acad Med 88(11):1635–1645CrossRef Schumacher DJ, Englander R, Carraccio C (2013) Developing the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environment. Acad Med 88(11):1635–1645CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jeong D, Presseau J, ElChamaa R, Naumann DN, Mascaro C, Luconi F, Smith KM, Kitto S (2018) Barriers and facilitators to self-directed learning in continuing professional development for physicians in Canada: a scoping review. Acad Med 93(8):1245–1254CrossRef Jeong D, Presseau J, ElChamaa R, Naumann DN, Mascaro C, Luconi F, Smith KM, Kitto S (2018) Barriers and facilitators to self-directed learning in continuing professional development for physicians in Canada: a scoping review. Acad Med 93(8):1245–1254CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cook DA, Price DW, Wittich CM, West CP, Blachman MJ (2017) Factors influencing physicians’ selection of continuous professional development activities: a cross-specialty national survey. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 37(3):154–160CrossRef Cook DA, Price DW, Wittich CM, West CP, Blachman MJ (2017) Factors influencing physicians’ selection of continuous professional development activities: a cross-specialty national survey. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 37(3):154–160CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L (2006) Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 296(9):1094–1102CrossRef Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L (2006) Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 296(9):1094–1102CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lockyer J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J (2011) Feedback data sources that inform physician self-assessment. Med Teach 33(2):e113–e120CrossRef Lockyer J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J (2011) Feedback data sources that inform physician self-assessment. Med Teach 33(2):e113–e120CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Peterson LE, Blackburn B, Bazemore A, O'Neill T, Phillips RL Jr (2014) Do family physicians choose self-assessment activities based on what they know or don’t know? J Contin Educ Heal Prof 34(3):164–170CrossRef Peterson LE, Blackburn B, Bazemore A, O'Neill T, Phillips RL Jr (2014) Do family physicians choose self-assessment activities based on what they know or don’t know? J Contin Educ Heal Prof 34(3):164–170CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Johnson DA, Austin DL, Thompson JN (2005) Role of state medical boards in continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 25(3):183–189CrossRef Johnson DA, Austin DL, Thompson JN (2005) Role of state medical boards in continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 25(3):183–189CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Leach DC, Fletcher SW (2008) Perspectives on continuing education in the health professions: improving health care through lifelong learning. Chest. 134(6):1299–1303CrossRef Leach DC, Fletcher SW (2008) Perspectives on continuing education in the health professions: improving health care through lifelong learning. Chest. 134(6):1299–1303CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A et al (2009) Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003030 Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A et al (2009) Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003030
20.
go back to reference Salinas GD (2015) CME effectiveness: utilizing outcomes assessments of 600+ CME programs to evaluate the association between format and effectiveness. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 35(Suppl 1):S38–S39CrossRef Salinas GD (2015) CME effectiveness: utilizing outcomes assessments of 600+ CME programs to evaluate the association between format and effectiveness. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 35(Suppl 1):S38–S39CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ, Greenberg SB, Greisinger AJ (2005) Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 294(9):1043–1051CrossRef Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ, Greenberg SB, Greisinger AJ (2005) Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 294(9):1043–1051CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Young KJ, Kim JJ, Yeung G, Sit C, Tobe SW (2011) Physician preferences for accredited online continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 31(4):241–246CrossRef Young KJ, Kim JJ, Yeung G, Sit C, Tobe SW (2011) Physician preferences for accredited online continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 31(4):241–246CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kaufman DM (2003) Applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 326(7382):213–216CrossRef Kaufman DM (2003) Applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 326(7382):213–216CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Reed S, Shell R, Kassis K, Tartaglia K, Wallihan R, Smith K, Hurtubise L, Martin B, Ledford C, Bradbury S, Bernstein H(H), Mahan JD (2014) Applying adult learning practices in medical education. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 44(6):170–181CrossRef Reed S, Shell R, Kassis K, Tartaglia K, Wallihan R, Smith K, Hurtubise L, Martin B, Ledford C, Bradbury S, Bernstein H(H), Mahan JD (2014) Applying adult learning practices in medical education. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 44(6):170–181CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Friedlander MJ, Andrews L, Armstrong EG, Aschenbrenner C, Kass JS, Ogden P, Schwartzstein R, Viggiano TR (2011) What can medical education learn from the neurobiology of learning? Acad Med 86(4):415–420CrossRef Friedlander MJ, Andrews L, Armstrong EG, Aschenbrenner C, Kass JS, Ogden P, Schwartzstein R, Viggiano TR (2011) What can medical education learn from the neurobiology of learning? Acad Med 86(4):415–420CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mahan JD, Stein DS (2014) Teaching adults-best practices that leverage the emerging understanding of the neurobiology of learning. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 44(6):141–149CrossRef Mahan JD, Stein DS (2014) Teaching adults-best practices that leverage the emerging understanding of the neurobiology of learning. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 44(6):141–149CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Slotnick HB (1999) How doctors learn: physicians’ self-directed learning episodes. Acad Med 74(10):1106–1117CrossRef Slotnick HB (1999) How doctors learn: physicians’ self-directed learning episodes. Acad Med 74(10):1106–1117CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Ferrier S, Muirhead P, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J (2006) Learning in practice: experiences and perceptions of high-scoring physicians. Acad Med 81(7):655–660CrossRef Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Ferrier S, Muirhead P, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J (2006) Learning in practice: experiences and perceptions of high-scoring physicians. Acad Med 81(7):655–660CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mamede S, Schmidt HG (2004) The structure of reflective practice in medicine. Med Educ 38(12):1302–1308CrossRef Mamede S, Schmidt HG (2004) The structure of reflective practice in medicine. Med Educ 38(12):1302–1308CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Duffy FD, Holmboe ES (2006) Self-assessment in lifelong learning and improving performance in practice: physician know thyself. JAMA. 296(9):1137–1139CrossRef Duffy FD, Holmboe ES (2006) Self-assessment in lifelong learning and improving performance in practice: physician know thyself. JAMA. 296(9):1137–1139CrossRef
31.
go back to reference McGaghie WC (2010) Medical education research as translational science. Sci Transl Med 2(19):19cm18CrossRef McGaghie WC (2010) Medical education research as translational science. Sci Transl Med 2(19):19cm18CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative Assessment of Learning Behaviors for Oncology Providers
Authors
Marie Wood
Thomas J. George
Rami Manochakian
Maura Polansky
Allyson Baer
Anne Grupe
Yu Shyr
Cathy Wang
Leora Horn
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01593-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Cancer Education 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine