Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 6/2019

01-12-2019

Measuring the Effects of Education in Detecting Lung Cancer on Chest Radiographs: Utilization of a New Assessment Tool

Authors: Junghyun Kim, Kwan Hyoung Kim

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of group and individualized educational lectures to accurately interpret chest radiographs of lung cancer patients and to introduce a new educational tool in evaluating skills for reading chest radiographs. Utilizing “hotspot” technology will be instrumental in measuring the effect of education in interpreting chest radiographs. There were 48 participants in the study. Chest radiographs of 100 lung cancer patients and 11 healthy patients taken at various time points were used for evaluation. Using “hotspot” technology, lesions on each radiograph were outlined. Values were taken at baseline, after which the group received lectures. Several days later, they underwent exam 2. Exam 3 was conducted after individualized lectures. A final exam was taken after the participants underwent individualized training within 2 months. Scores significantly improved after the individual lessons (p < 0.001). This improvement in performance decreased in the final examination. Statistically significant differences were observed between exam 2 vs. exam 3 and exam 3 vs. the final exam (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Participants demonstrated more improvement in detecting lesions in abnormal chest radiographs than in identifying normal ones. Although there was significant improvement in detecting abnormal radiographs by the end of the study (p < 0.001), no improvement was observed in detecting normal ones. We measured lung cancer detection rate using a new “hotspot” detection tool for chest radiographs. With the proposed scoring system, this tool could be objectively used in evaluating the educational effects.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Van Ginneken B, ter Haar Romeny BM, Viergever MA (2001) Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:1228–1241CrossRef Van Ginneken B, ter Haar Romeny BM, Viergever MA (2001) Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:1228–1241CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shiraishi J, Abe H, Engelmann R, Aoyama M, MacMahon H, Doi K (2003) Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists’ performance—initial experience. Radiology 227:469–474CrossRef Shiraishi J, Abe H, Engelmann R, Aoyama M, MacMahon H, Doi K (2003) Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists’ performance—initial experience. Radiology 227:469–474CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen JJ, White CS (2008) Use of CAD to evaluate lung cancer on chest radiography. J Thorac Imaging 23:93–96CrossRef Chen JJ, White CS (2008) Use of CAD to evaluate lung cancer on chest radiography. J Thorac Imaging 23:93–96CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shiraishi J, Li Q, Appelbaum D, Doi K (2011) Computer-aided diagnosis and artificial intelligence in clinical imaging. Semin Nucl Med 41:449–462CrossRef Shiraishi J, Li Q, Appelbaum D, Doi K (2011) Computer-aided diagnosis and artificial intelligence in clinical imaging. Semin Nucl Med 41:449–462CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mazzone PJ, Obuchowski N, Phillips M, Risius B, Bazerbashi B, Meziane M (2013) Lung cancer screening with computer aided detection chest radiography: design and results of a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One 8:e59650CrossRef Mazzone PJ, Obuchowski N, Phillips M, Risius B, Bazerbashi B, Meziane M (2013) Lung cancer screening with computer aided detection chest radiography: design and results of a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One 8:e59650CrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Lung cancer screening. Version 2. 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Lung cancer screening. Version 2. 2016
8.
go back to reference Fontana R, Sanderson DR, Woolner LB et al (1991) Screening for lung cancer: a critique of the Mayo Lung Project. Cancer 67:1155–1164CrossRef Fontana R, Sanderson DR, Woolner LB et al (1991) Screening for lung cancer: a critique of the Mayo Lung Project. Cancer 67:1155–1164CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kubik A, Polak J (1986) Lung cancer detection: results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia. Cancer 57:2428–2437CrossRef Kubik A, Polak J (1986) Lung cancer detection: results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia. Cancer 57:2428–2437CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Strauss GM, Gleason RE, Sugarbaker DJ (1997) Screening for lung cancer. Another look; a different view. Chest 111:754–768CrossRef Strauss GM, Gleason RE, Sugarbaker DJ (1997) Screening for lung cancer. Another look; a different view. Chest 111:754–768CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brett GZ (1969) Earlier diagnosis and survival in lung cancer. Br Med J 4:260–262CrossRef Brett GZ (1969) Earlier diagnosis and survival in lung cancer. Br Med J 4:260–262CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Monnier-Cholley L, Carrat F, Cholley BP, Tubiana JM, Arrivé L (2004) Detection of lung cancer on radiographs; receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists’, pulmonologists’, and anesthesiologists’ performance. Radiology 233:799–805CrossRef Monnier-Cholley L, Carrat F, Cholley BP, Tubiana JM, Arrivé L (2004) Detection of lung cancer on radiographs; receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists’, pulmonologists’, and anesthesiologists’ performance. Radiology 233:799–805CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kuritzky L, Hardy RI, Curry RW (1987) Interpretation of chest roentgenograms by primary care physicians. South Med J 80:1347–1351CrossRef Kuritzky L, Hardy RI, Curry RW (1987) Interpretation of chest roentgenograms by primary care physicians. South Med J 80:1347–1351CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kaufman B, Dhar P, O’Neill D et al (2001) Chest radiograph interpretation skills of anesthesiologists. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 15:680–683CrossRef Kaufman B, Dhar P, O’Neill D et al (2001) Chest radiograph interpretation skills of anesthesiologists. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 15:680–683CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Grosvenor LJ, Verma R, O’Brien R et al (2003) Does reporting of plain chest radiographs affect the immediate management of patients admitted to a medical assessment unit? Clin Radiol 58:719–722CrossRef Grosvenor LJ, Verma R, O’Brien R et al (2003) Does reporting of plain chest radiographs affect the immediate management of patients admitted to a medical assessment unit? Clin Radiol 58:719–722CrossRef
16.
go back to reference IBM Corp (2016) IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY IBM Corp (2016) IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY
17.
go back to reference Keijzers G, Sithirasenan V (2011) The effect of a chest imaging lecture on emergency department doctors’ ability to interpret chest CT images: a randomized study. Eur J Emerg Med 19:40–45CrossRef Keijzers G, Sithirasenan V (2011) The effect of a chest imaging lecture on emergency department doctors’ ability to interpret chest CT images: a randomized study. Eur J Emerg Med 19:40–45CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Torre DM, Simpson D, Sebastian JL, Elnicki DM (2005) Learning/feedback activities and high-quality teaching: perceptions of third-year medical students during an inpatient rotation. Acad Med 80:950–954CrossRef Torre DM, Simpson D, Sebastian JL, Elnicki DM (2005) Learning/feedback activities and high-quality teaching: perceptions of third-year medical students during an inpatient rotation. Acad Med 80:950–954CrossRef
19.
go back to reference van Geel K, Kik EM, Dijkstra J, Robben SG, van Merrienboer JJ (2017) Teaching systematic viewing to final-year medical students improves systematicity but not coverage or detection or radiologic abnormalities. J Am Coll Radiol 14:235–241CrossRef van Geel K, Kik EM, Dijkstra J, Robben SG, van Merrienboer JJ (2017) Teaching systematic viewing to final-year medical students improves systematicity but not coverage or detection or radiologic abnormalities. J Am Coll Radiol 14:235–241CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chen Y, James JJ, Dong L, Gale AG (2017) Measuring performance in the interpretation of chest radiographs: a pilot study. Clin Radiol 72:230–235CrossRef Chen Y, James JJ, Dong L, Gale AG (2017) Measuring performance in the interpretation of chest radiographs: a pilot study. Clin Radiol 72:230–235CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rozenshtein A, Pearson GD, Yan SX, Liu AZ, Toy D (2016) Effect of massed versus interleaved teaching method on performance of students in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 13:979–984CrossRef Rozenshtein A, Pearson GD, Yan SX, Liu AZ, Toy D (2016) Effect of massed versus interleaved teaching method on performance of students in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 13:979–984CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring the Effects of Education in Detecting Lung Cancer on Chest Radiographs: Utilization of a New Assessment Tool
Authors
Junghyun Kim
Kwan Hyoung Kim
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1431-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Journal of Cancer Education 6/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine