Top

Published in:

01-02-2018

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cervical Cancer Education Intervention for Latinas Delivered Through Interactive, Multimedia Kiosks

Authors: Armando Valdez, Anna M. Napoles, Susan L. Stewart, Alvaro Garza

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

US Latina women experience disproportionately high cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates. These health disparities are largely preventable with routine pap tests and human papillomavirus (HPV) screening. This study tested the efficacy of a cervical cancer education intervention to improve risk factor knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and self-reported behavior related to cervical cancer screening among low-income Latinas who had not been screened in the past 2 years, compared to a usual care control group. Low-income Latinas who had not had a pap test in the prior 2 years were recruited from three Federally Qualified Health Centers and randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, with in-person assessment at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Women in the intervention group received a one-time low-literacy cervical cancer education program through an interactive, multimedia kiosk in either English or Spanish based on their language preference. Compared to the control group, the intervention group demonstrated greater knowledge (p < 0.0001) and more favorable attitudes at follow-up; fewer intervention group women never thought of getting a pap test (46 vs. 54 %, p = 0.050) or agreed that it is fate whether a woman gets cervical cancer or not (24 vs. 31 %, p = 0.043). The groups did not differ significantly on the proportion who had obtained or made an appointment for a pap test at follow-up (51 vs. 48 %, p = 0.35). Both groups reported high levels of self-efficacy regarding pap screening at post-intervention. A one-time interactive, multimedia educational intervention improved cervical cancer knowledge and attitudes among low-income Latinas but had no effect on cervical cancer-screening behavior. Exposure of the control group to the pre-test conducted on the multimedia kiosk may have influenced their screening behavior.

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program Populations (1969-2005) (http://www.seer.cancer.gov/popdata), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2008.

Ruiz MS, Marks G, Richardson JL (1992) Language acculturation and screening practices of elderly Hispanic women. J Aging Health 4(2):268–281PubMedCrossRef

SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1996.

Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. (2008) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/,based on November 2007 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site

Mitchell JB, McCormack LA (1997) Time trends in late-stage diagnosis of cervical cancer. Differences by race/ethnicity and income. Med Care 35(12):1220–1224PubMedCrossRef

Suarez L, Martin J, Weiss N (1991) Data-based interventions for cancer control in Texas. Tex Med 87(8):70–77PubMed

American Cancer Society: Cancer Risk Report Prevention and Control 1997.

Perez-Stable EJ, Sabogal F, Otero-Sabogal R, et al. (1995) Use of cancer-screening tests in the San Francisco Bay Area: Comparison of Latinos and Anglos. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 18:147–154 48

Perkins CI, Wright WE, Schlag R (1997) Cancer Incidence and Mortality in California by Race/ Ethnicity, 1988-1994. Cancer Surveillance Section. Department of Health Services

10.

Clark M (1985) Bartolomeo, Inc. A Study of Hispanics’ Attitudes concerning cancer and cancer prevention. American Cancer Society Report. 1-28

11.

Hubbell AF, Chavez LR, Mishra SI, et al. (1995) From ethnography to intervention: developing breast cancer control programs for Latinas. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 18:109–116

12.

Navarro AM, Senn KL, Kaplan KM, et al. (1995) Por La Vida intervention model for cancer prevention in Latinas. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 18:137–146

13.

Perez-Stable EJ, Otero-Sabogal R, Sabogal F, et al. (1994) Self-reported use of cancer screening tests among Latinos and Anglos in a prepaid health plan. Arch Intern Med 154(10):1073–1081PubMedCrossRef

14.

Tortolero-Luna G, Glober GA, Villareal R, et al. (1995) Screening Practices and Knowledge, Attitudes, and beliefs about cancer among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women 35 years old and older in Nueces County, Texas. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 18:49–56

15.

Solis JM, Marks G, Garcia M, et al. (1990) Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: findings from HHANES 1982-84. Am J Public Health 80(suppl):11–19PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

16.

Martin LM, Parker SL, Wingo PA, Heath CW Jr (1996) Cervical cancer incidence and screening: status report on women in the United States. Cancer Pract 4(3):130–134PubMed

17.

Schur CL, Albers LA (1996) Language, sociodemographics, and health care use of Hispanic adults. J Health Care Poor Underserved 7(2):140–158PubMedCrossRef

18.

Stein JA, Fox SA (1991) The influence of ethnicity, socioeconimic status, and psychological barriers on use of mammography. J Health Soc Behav 32:101–113PubMedCrossRef

19.

Fox SA, Stein JA (1991) The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care 29(11):1065–1082PubMedCrossRef

20.

Prochaska JO, Velicer WF (1997) The Transtheoretical Model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 12:38–48PubMedCrossRef

21.

Zapka JG, Puleo E, Taplin SH, et al. (2004) Processes of care in cervical and breast cancer screening and follow-up--the importance of communication. Prev Med 39(1):81–90PubMedCrossRef

22.

Morgan C, Levin G (1995) A cancer-prevention intervention for disadvantaged women: design and implementation. J Cancer Educ 10(3):168–175PubMed

23.

Ramirez AG, McAlister A, Gallion KJ, et al. (1995) Community level cancer control in a Texas barrio: Part I-Theoretical basis, implementation, and process evaluation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 18:117–122

24.

Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, et al. (1993) Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in U.S. women. Am J Public Health 85:53–60CrossRef

25.

Kim SE, Pérez-Stable EJ, Wong S, et al. (2008) Association between cancer risk perception and screening behavior among diverse women. Arch Intern Med 168(7):728–734PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

26.

Vanslyke JG, Baum J, Plaza V, et al. (2008) HPV and cervical cancer testing and prevention: knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes among Hispanic women. Qual Health Res 18(5):584–596 Epub 2008 Mar 12PubMedCrossRef

27.

Ackerson K, Gretebeck K (2007) Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women. Am Acad Nurse Pract 19(11):591–601CrossRef

28.

Wallace D, Hunter J, Papenfuss M, et al. (2007) Pap smear screening among women >/=40 years residing at the United States-Mexico border. Health Care Women Int 28(9):799–816PubMedCrossRef

29.

Byrd TL, Chavez R, Wilson KM (2007) Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Ethn Dis 17(1):129–134PubMed

30.

Byrd TL, Peterson SK, Chavez R, et al. (2004) Cervical cancer screening beliefs among young Hispanic women. Prev Med 38(2):192–197PubMedCrossRef

31.

Ramirez AG, Suarez L, Laufman L, et al. (2000) Hispanic women’s breast and cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors. Am J Health Promot 14(5):292–300PubMedCrossRef

32.

Chavez LR, Hubbell FA, Mishra SI, et al. (1997) The influence of fatalism on self-reported use of Papanicolaou smears. Am J Prev Med 13(6):418–424PubMed

33.

Clark M (1985) Bartolomeo, Inc. A Study of Hispanics’ Attitudes concerning cancer and cancer prevention. Am Cancer Soc Rep. 1-28

34.

Buki LP, Jamison J, Anderson CJ, et al. (2007) Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women. Cancer 110(7):1578–1585PubMedCrossRef

35.

Adams EK, Breen N, Joski PJ (2007) Impact of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on mammography and Pap test utilization among white, Hispanic, and African American women: 1996-2000. Cancer 109(2 Suppl):348–358PubMedCrossRef

36.

De Alba I, Sweningson JM (2006) English proficiency and physicians’ recommendation of Pap smears among Hispanics. Cancer Detect Prev 30(3):292–296 Epub 2006 Jul 17PubMedCrossRef

37.

Moreland S, Engelman K, Greiner KA, et al. (2006) Papanicolaou testing among Native American and Hispanic populations. Ethn Dis 16(1):223–227PubMed

38.

Shah M, Zhu K, Wu H, et al. (2006) Hispanic acculturation and utilization of cervical cancer screening in the US. Prev Med 42(2):146–149 Epub 2005 Nov 16PubMedCrossRef

39.

De Alba I, Ngo-Metzger Q, Sweningson JM, et al. (2005) Pap smear use in California: are we closing the racial/ethnic gap? Prev Med 40(6):747–755PubMedCrossRef

40.

McMullin JM, De Alba I, Chávez LR, et al. (2005) Influence of beliefs about cervical cancer etiology on Pap smear use among Latina immigrants. Ethn Health 10(1):3–18PubMedCrossRef

41.

Borrayo EA, Thomas JJ, Lawsin C (2004) Cervical cancer screening among Latinas: the importance of referral and participation in parallel cancer screening behaviors. Women Health 39(2):13–29PubMedCrossRef

42.

Scarinci IC, Beech BM, Kovach KW, et al. (2003) An examination of sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among low-income Latina immigrants of reproductive age. J Immigr Health 5(3):119–128PubMedCrossRef

43.

Suarez L, Roche RA, Pulley LV, et al. (1997) Why a peer intervention program for Mexican-American women failed to modify the secular trend in cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 13(6):411–417PubMed

44.

Peragallo NP, Alba ML, Tow B (1997) Cervical cancer screening practices among Latino women in Chicago. Public Health Nurs 14(4):251–255PubMedCrossRef

45.

Skaer TL, Robison LM, Sclar DA, et al. (1996) Knowledge, attitudes, and patterns of cancer screening: a self-report among foreign born Hispanic women utilizing rural migrant health clinics. J Rural Health 12(3):169–177PubMedCrossRef

46.

Garbers S, Chiasson MA (2004) Inadequate functional health literacy in Spanish as a barrier to cervical cancer screening among immigrant Latinas in New York City. Prev Chronic Dis 1(4):A07 Epub 2004 Sep 15PubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Richards T, et al. (2003) Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Hispanic and non-Hispanic women residing near the United States-Mexico border, 1999-2000. Fam Community Health 26(2):130–139PubMedCrossRef

48.

O’Malley AS, Gonzalez RM, Sheppard VB, et al. (2003) Primary care cancer control interventions including Latinos: a review. Am J Prev Med 25(3):264–271PubMedCrossRef

49.

Zhu J, Davis J, Taira DA, et al. (2006) Screening rates and characteristics of health plan members who respond to screening reminders. Prev Chronic Dis 3(2):A56 Epub 2006 Mar 15PubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Partin MR, Slater JS, Caplan L (2005) Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results. Prev Med 41(3-4):734–740 Epub 2005 Jul 25PubMedCrossRef

51.

Morrell S, Taylor R, Zeckendorf S, et al. (2005) How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under-screened women in NSW? Aust N Z J Public Health 29(1):78–84PubMedCrossRef

52.

Saywell RM Jr, Champion VL, Skinner CS, et al. (2004) A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening. J Women’s Health (Larchmt) 13(8):909–918CrossRef

53.

Bobo JK, Shapiro JA, Schulman J, et al. (2004) On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(4):620–630

54.

Eaker S, Adami HO, Granath F, et al. (2004) A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(3):346–354

55.

Yabroff KR, Mangan P, Mandelblatt J (2003) Effectiveness of interventions to increase Papanicolaou smear use. J Am Board Fam Pract 16(3):188–203PubMedCrossRef

56.

Burack RC, Gimotty PA, Simon M, et al. (2003) The effect of adding Pap smear information to a mammography reminder system in an HMO: results of randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 36(5):547–554PubMedCrossRef

57.

McCaul KD, Wold KS (2002) The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening. J Community Health 27(3):181–190PubMedCrossRef

58.

Tseng DS, Cox E, Plane MB, et al. (2001) Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 16(8):563–568PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

59.

Simon MS, Gimotty PA, Moncrease A, et al. (2001) The effect of patient reminders on the use of screening mammography in an urban health department primary care setting. Breast Cancer Res Treat 65(1):63–70PubMedCrossRef

60.

Torres-Mejía G, Salmerón-Castro J, Téllez-Rojo MM, et al. (2000) Call and recall for cervical cancer screening in a developing country: a randomised field trial. Int J Cancer 87(6):869–873PubMedCrossRef

61.

Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Ludman E, et al. (2000) Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):233–242PubMedCrossRef

62.

McPhee SJ, Nguyen TT, Shema SJ, et al. (2002) Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population. Prev Med 35(5):463–473PubMedCrossRef

63.

Somkin CP, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T, et al. (2004) The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population. Med Care 42(9):914–926PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cervical Cancer Education Intervention for Latinas Delivered Through Interactive, Multimedia Kiosks
Authors: Armando Valdez
Anna M. Napoles
Susan L. Stewart
Alvaro Garza
Publication date: 01-02-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1102-6

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Developing Sustainable Cancer Education Programs: Training Public Health Students to Deliver Cancer 101 in Puerto Rico

Cancer-Diagnosed Individuals’ Use of Television and the Internet as a Source for Peer Stories and Associated Emotional Responses

Readability and Coherence of Department/Ministry of Health HPV Information

Training Primary Health Professionals in Breast Cancer Prevention: Evidence and Experience from Mexico

Effects of Creating Awareness Through Photographs and Posters on Skin Self-Examination in Nursing Students

Integrating Collaborative Learning and Competition in a Hematology/Oncology Training Program

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer