Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2012

01-12-2012

Health Care Providers’ Perspectives of an Intervention Designed to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Family Medicine Residency Clinics

A Qualitative Study

Authors: Sara Rowe, Geoffrey Goldsmith, Robert Price, Audrey Brooks, Amanda Harvey

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain feedback from family medicine residents and clinic nurses regarding a colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) intervention. Focus groups were used to ask participants three questions about their perceptions of the intervention and subsequent patient screening behaviors. Content analysis and constant comparison were used to yield two meaningful themes from the participant responses: patient-specific issues and study design issues. Patient-specific issues included: lack of education and fear, finances and insurance coverage, and compliance. Study design issues included: lack of time, a need for reminders to discuss CRCS with patients, quality of the nurse’s role, and a need for better clinical staff education and awareness. Results show ways to significantly improve future implementation of the CRCS intervention. Ultimately, future use of clinic-based CRCS interventions could be vastly improved by utilizing strategies to promote teamwork and increase the sense of mutual ownership among clinic staff.
Literature
2.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report—United States 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60:42–46 US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report—United States 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60:42–46
3.
go back to reference Brenes GA, Paskett ED (2000) Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 31:410–416PubMedCrossRef Brenes GA, Paskett ED (2000) Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 31:410–416PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wei EK, Ryan CT, Dietrich AJ, Colditz GA (2005) Improving colorectal cancer screening by targeting office systems in primary care practices. Arch Intern Med 165:661–666PubMedCrossRef Wei EK, Ryan CT, Dietrich AJ, Colditz GA (2005) Improving colorectal cancer screening by targeting office systems in primary care practices. Arch Intern Med 165:661–666PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dietrich AJ, O’Connor GT, Keller A, Carney PA, Levy D, Whaley FS (1992) Cancer: improving early and prevention; a community practice randomized trial. BMJ 304:687–691PubMedCrossRef Dietrich AJ, O’Connor GT, Keller A, Carney PA, Levy D, Whaley FS (1992) Cancer: improving early and prevention; a community practice randomized trial. BMJ 304:687–691PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dietrich AJ, Woodruff CB, Carney PA (1994) Changing office routines to enhance preventive care; the preventive GAPS approach. Arch Fam Med 3:176–183PubMedCrossRef Dietrich AJ, Woodruff CB, Carney PA (1994) Changing office routines to enhance preventive care; the preventive GAPS approach. Arch Fam Med 3:176–183PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sabatino SA, Habarta N, Baron RC, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Kerner J, Souglin SS, Kalra GP, Chattopadhyay S (2008) Intervention to increase recommendations and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare provider: systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. Am J Prev Med 35:67–74CrossRef Sabatino SA, Habarta N, Baron RC, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Kerner J, Souglin SS, Kalra GP, Chattopadhyay S (2008) Intervention to increase recommendations and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare provider: systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. Am J Prev Med 35:67–74CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (2005) The transtheorectical approach. In: Norcass JC, Goldfrid MR (eds) Handbook of psychotherapy integration, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 147–171 Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (2005) The transtheorectical approach. In: Norcass JC, Goldfrid MR (eds) Handbook of psychotherapy integration, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 147–171
9.
go back to reference Goldsmith G, Chiaro C (2008) Colorectal cancer screening: how to help patients comply. J Fam Pract 57:2–7 Goldsmith G, Chiaro C (2008) Colorectal cancer screening: how to help patients comply. J Fam Pract 57:2–7
11.
go back to reference Krueger RA (1994) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks Krueger RA (1994) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
12.
go back to reference Wengraf T (2001) Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narratives and semi-structured methods. Sage, London, England Wengraf T (2001) Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narratives and semi-structured methods. Sage, London, England
13.
go back to reference Lawson L, Rowe S (2010) Treatment of females convicted of molesting children. J Forensic Nurs 6:180–187PubMedCrossRef Lawson L, Rowe S (2010) Treatment of females convicted of molesting children. J Forensic Nurs 6:180–187PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Robinson-Wolf Z (2007) Ethnography: the method. In: Munahll P (ed) Nursing research: a qualitative perspective, 4th edn. Jones and Barlett, Sudbury, pp 293–319 Robinson-Wolf Z (2007) Ethnography: the method. In: Munahll P (ed) Nursing research: a qualitative perspective, 4th edn. Jones and Barlett, Sudbury, pp 293–319
15.
go back to reference Streubert H, Carpenter D (1999) Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia Streubert H, Carpenter D (1999) Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
16.
go back to reference Curry LA, Spatz E, Cherlin E, Thompson JW, Berg D, Ting HH, Decker C, Krumholz HM, Bradley EH (2011) What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? Ann Intern Med 154:384–390PubMed Curry LA, Spatz E, Cherlin E, Thompson JW, Berg D, Ting HH, Decker C, Krumholz HM, Bradley EH (2011) What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? Ann Intern Med 154:384–390PubMed
17.
go back to reference Berwick DM (2002) A user’s manual for the IOM’s Quality Chasm report. Heal Aff 21:80–90CrossRef Berwick DM (2002) A user’s manual for the IOM’s Quality Chasm report. Heal Aff 21:80–90CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Collins J (2006) Good to great: why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. Harper Collins, New York Collins J (2006) Good to great: why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. Harper Collins, New York
Metadata
Title
Health Care Providers’ Perspectives of an Intervention Designed to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Family Medicine Residency Clinics
A Qualitative Study
Authors
Sara Rowe
Geoffrey Goldsmith
Robert Price
Audrey Brooks
Amanda Harvey
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0393-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine