Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 1/2012

01-03-2012

Formative Research on Perceptions of Biobanking: What Community Members Think

Authors: John S. Luque, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Francisco A. Montel-Ishino, Mariana Arevalo, Shalanda A. Bynum, Shalewa Noel-Thomas, Kristen J. Wells, Clement K. Gwede, Cathy D. Meade, Tampa Bay Community Cancer Network Partners

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Preparing healthy community members with timely communications prior to engaging them in a request to donate biospecimens promises to improve the experience of biobanking participation. To this end, a qualitative study was conducted to assess community member knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and informational needs about cancer-related biospecimen collection in a large metropolitan area in southwest Florida. The study utilized purposive sampling techniques to recruit a total of 95 participants to participate in 12 focus groups, segmented by race/ethnicity and language preference (mixed race, African American only, and Spanish speaking) and age (18–29, 30–54, and 55 and older). Focus group interviews were analyzed using content analysis to identify emergent themes. Overall, participants in the 30 years and older groups were favorable toward participating in biobanking if their concerns were addressed, such as confidentiality and consent issues, in contrast to participants aged 18–29 who were more skeptical. For all participants, the desire to participate in research that seeks new cancer treatments outweighed mistrust. Moreover, many cited the potential scientific benefit for future generations as a primary motivator. Finally, in some groups a therapeutic misconception was expressed, where participants expressed a willingness to forego confidentiality of their health status in exchange for therapeutic benefit. This study contributes to the literature on community perceptions of the benefits and barriers of biobanking and adds to the development of meaningful education communication priming tools to advance understandings about biobanking.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bauer K, Taub S, Parsi K (2004) Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: a brief review of existing organizational policies. Theor Med Bioeth 25(2):113–142PubMedCrossRef Bauer K, Taub S, Parsi K (2004) Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: a brief review of existing organizational policies. Theor Med Bioeth 25(2):113–142PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hewitt RE (2011) Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol 23(1):112–119PubMedCrossRef Hewitt RE (2011) Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol 23(1):112–119PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Khoury MJ, Millikan R, Little J, Gwinn M (2004) The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age. Int J Epidemiol 33(5):936–944PubMedCrossRef Khoury MJ, Millikan R, Little J, Gwinn M (2004) The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age. Int J Epidemiol 33(5):936–944PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Morente MM, Fernández PL, Alava E (2008) Biobanking: old activity or young discipline? Semin Diagn Pathol 25(4):317–322PubMedCrossRef Morente MM, Fernández PL, Alava E (2008) Biobanking: old activity or young discipline? Semin Diagn Pathol 25(4):317–322PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barr M (2006) I’m not really read up on genetics: biobanks and the social context of informed consent. BioSocieties 1(02):251–262CrossRef Barr M (2006) I’m not really read up on genetics: biobanks and the social context of informed consent. BioSocieties 1(02):251–262CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jack AL, Womack C (2003) Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: review of records. BMJ 327(7409):262PubMedCrossRef Jack AL, Womack C (2003) Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: review of records. BMJ 327(7409):262PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Compton C (2007) Cancer biobanking: the American perspective. Eur J Cancer Suppl 5(8):5–6CrossRef Compton C (2007) Cancer biobanking: the American perspective. Eur J Cancer Suppl 5(8):5–6CrossRef
8.
go back to reference O’Doherty K, Hawkins A (2010) Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking. Public Health Genomics 13(4):197–206PubMedCrossRef O’Doherty K, Hawkins A (2010) Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking. Public Health Genomics 13(4):197–206PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goldman RE, Kingdon C, Wasser J et al (2008) Rhode Islanders’ attitudes towards the development of a statewide genetic biobank. Per Med 5(4):339–359CrossRef Goldman RE, Kingdon C, Wasser J et al (2008) Rhode Islanders’ attitudes towards the development of a statewide genetic biobank. Per Med 5(4):339–359CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Secko DM, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess MM (2009) Informed consent in Biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Soc Sci Med 68:781–789PubMedCrossRef Secko DM, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess MM (2009) Informed consent in Biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Soc Sci Med 68:781–789PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Deschênes M, Sallée C (2005) Accountability in population biobanking: comparative approaches. J Law Med Ethics 33:41–53CrossRef Deschênes M, Sallée C (2005) Accountability in population biobanking: comparative approaches. J Law Med Ethics 33:41–53CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W (1987) False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 17(2):20–24PubMedCrossRef Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W (1987) False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 17(2):20–24PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lidz C, Appelbaum P, Grisso T, Renaud M (2004) Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 58:1689–1697PubMedCrossRef Lidz C, Appelbaum P, Grisso T, Renaud M (2004) Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 58:1689–1697PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Morrell B, Lipworth W, Axler R, Kerridge I, Little M (2011) Cancer as rubbish: donation of tumor tissue for research. Qual Health Res 21:(X1) Morrell B, Lipworth W, Axler R, Kerridge I, Little M (2011) Cancer as rubbish: donation of tumor tissue for research. Qual Health Res 21:(X1)
17.
go back to reference Johnsson L, Hansson MG, Eriksson S, Helgesson G (2008) Patients’ refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study. BMJ 337:a345PubMedCrossRef Johnsson L, Hansson MG, Eriksson S, Helgesson G (2008) Patients’ refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study. BMJ 337:a345PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Chang C et al (2011) For what am I participating? The need for communication after receiving consent from biobanking project participants: experience in Japan. J Hum Genet 56(5):358–363PubMedCrossRef Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Chang C et al (2011) For what am I participating? The need for communication after receiving consent from biobanking project participants: experience in Japan. J Hum Genet 56(5):358–363PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Axler RE, Irvine R, Lipworth W, Morrell B, Kerridge IH (2008) Why might people donate tissue for cancer research? Insights from organ/tissue/blood donation and clinical research. Pathobiology 75(6):323–329PubMedCrossRef Axler RE, Irvine R, Lipworth W, Morrell B, Kerridge IH (2008) Why might people donate tissue for cancer research? Insights from organ/tissue/blood donation and clinical research. Pathobiology 75(6):323–329PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K (2009) Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. Am J Public Health 99(12):2128–2134PubMedCrossRef Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K (2009) Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. Am J Public Health 99(12):2128–2134PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Hoeyer K, Olofsson B-O, Mjörndal T, Lynöe N (2005) The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. Arch Intern Med 165:97–100PubMedCrossRef Hoeyer K, Olofsson B-O, Mjörndal T, Lynöe N (2005) The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. Arch Intern Med 165:97–100PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Meade C, Menard J, Martinez D, Calvo A (2007) Impacting health disparities through community outreach: utilizing the CLEAN look (culture, literacy, education, assessment, networking). Cancer Control 14(1):70–77PubMed Meade C, Menard J, Martinez D, Calvo A (2007) Impacting health disparities through community outreach: utilizing the CLEAN look (culture, literacy, education, assessment, networking). Cancer Control 14(1):70–77PubMed
25.
go back to reference Yeatman TJ, Mule J, Dalton WS, Sullivan D (2008) On the eve of personalized medicine in oncology. Cancer Res 68(18):7250–7252PubMedCrossRef Yeatman TJ, Mule J, Dalton WS, Sullivan D (2008) On the eve of personalized medicine in oncology. Cancer Res 68(18):7250–7252PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Meade CD (2003) Cancer care for diverse populations: relevant communications and research. Cancer Control 10(5 Suppl):1–2PubMed Meade CD (2003) Cancer care for diverse populations: relevant communications and research. Cancer Control 10(5 Suppl):1–2PubMed
28.
go back to reference Quinn GP, Thomas KB, Hauser K, Rodriguez NY, Rodriguez-Snapp N (2008) Evaluation of educational materials from a social marketing campaign to promote folic acid use among Hispanic women: insight from Cuban and Puerto Rican ethnic subgroups. J Immigr Minor Health 11(5):406–414PubMedCrossRef Quinn GP, Thomas KB, Hauser K, Rodriguez NY, Rodriguez-Snapp N (2008) Evaluation of educational materials from a social marketing campaign to promote folic acid use among Hispanic women: insight from Cuban and Puerto Rican ethnic subgroups. J Immigr Minor Health 11(5):406–414PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Goodson ML, Vernon BG (2004) A study of public opinion on the use of tissue samples from living subjects for clinical research. J Clin Pathol 57(2):135–138PubMedCrossRef Goodson ML, Vernon BG (2004) A study of public opinion on the use of tissue samples from living subjects for clinical research. J Clin Pathol 57(2):135–138PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wendler D, Emanuel E (2002) The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? Arch Intern Med 162(13):1457–1462PubMedCrossRef Wendler D, Emanuel E (2002) The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? Arch Intern Med 162(13):1457–1462PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R (2003) Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 12(2):93–99PubMedCrossRef Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R (2003) Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 12(2):93–99PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
33.
go back to reference VERBI Software. MAXQDA 10 2010. Marburg, Germany VERBI Software. MAXQDA 10 2010. Marburg, Germany
34.
go back to reference U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151(10):716–726, W-236 U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151(10):716–726, W-236
35.
go back to reference Skloot R (2010) The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Random House, New York Skloot R (2010) The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Random House, New York
36.
go back to reference Hawkins AK (2010) Biobanks: importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 19(5):423–429PubMedCrossRef Hawkins AK (2010) Biobanks: importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 19(5):423–429PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
go back to reference Scharff DP, Mathews KJ, Jackson P, Hoffsuemmer J, Martin E, Edwards D (2010) More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved 21(3):879–897PubMedCrossRef Scharff DP, Mathews KJ, Jackson P, Hoffsuemmer J, Martin E, Edwards D (2010) More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved 21(3):879–897PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Goebel JW, Pickardt T, Bedau M et al (2010) Legal and ethical consequences of international biobanking from a national perspective: the German BMB-EUCoop project. Eur J Hum Genet 18(5):522–525PubMedCrossRef Goebel JW, Pickardt T, Bedau M et al (2010) Legal and ethical consequences of international biobanking from a national perspective: the German BMB-EUCoop project. Eur J Hum Genet 18(5):522–525PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Forsberg JS, Eriksson S, Hansson MG (2010) Changing defaults in biobank research could save lives too. Eur J Epidemiol 25(2):65–68PubMedCrossRef Forsberg JS, Eriksson S, Hansson MG (2010) Changing defaults in biobank research could save lives too. Eur J Epidemiol 25(2):65–68PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Beskow LM, Dean E (2008) Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants’ understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(6):1440–1451PubMedCrossRef Beskow LM, Dean E (2008) Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants’ understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(6):1440–1451PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Formative Research on Perceptions of Biobanking: What Community Members Think
Authors
John S. Luque
Gwendolyn P. Quinn
Francisco A. Montel-Ishino
Mariana Arevalo
Shalanda A. Bynum
Shalewa Noel-Thomas
Kristen J. Wells
Clement K. Gwede
Cathy D. Meade
Tampa Bay Community Cancer Network Partners
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0275-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Journal of Cancer Education 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine