Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 1/2011

01-03-2011

Ethics Consultation on a Gynecologic Oncology Service: An Opportunity for Physician Education

Authors: Matthew P. Schlumbrecht, Colleen M. Gallagher, Charlotte C. Sun, Lois M. Ramondetta, Diane C. Bodurka

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the features of gynecologic oncology patients who receive ethics consults in order to identify areas for physician education and improve patient care. A review of ethics consults for gynecologic oncology patients from 1993 to 2008 was performed. Information on all gynecologic oncology patients treated during the study interval was also collected to define a base population for comparison. Forty-one consults were performed. Compared to the base population, a greater proportion of consult patients had pregnancy-related malignancies (7.9% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.0001) and were African American (33.3% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.0001). The most common clinical case types involved identifying levels of appropriate treatment. Support of the health care team and complex family dynamics were key underlying issues. Ethics consultation provides a substantial resource in identifying relevant issues experienced by gynecologic oncology patients upon which physician educational initiatives may be based.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fox E, Myers S, Pearlman R (2007) Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am J Bioeth 7(2):13–25CrossRefPubMed Fox E, Myers S, Pearlman R (2007) Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am J Bioeth 7(2):13–25CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nilson E, Acres C, Tamerin N, Fins J (2008) Clinical ethics and the quality initiative: a pilot study for the empirical evaluation of ethics case consultation. Am J Med Qual 23(5):356–364CrossRefPubMed Nilson E, Acres C, Tamerin N, Fins J (2008) Clinical ethics and the quality initiative: a pilot study for the empirical evaluation of ethics case consultation. Am J Med Qual 23(5):356–364CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Schneiderman L, Gilmer T, Teetzel H, Dugan D, Blustein J, Cranford R et al (2003) Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting. J Am Med Assoc 290(9):1166–1172CrossRef Schneiderman L, Gilmer T, Teetzel H, Dugan D, Blustein J, Cranford R et al (2003) Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting. J Am Med Assoc 290(9):1166–1172CrossRef
4.
go back to reference McCormack P (1998) Quality of life and the right to die: an ethical dilemma. J Adv Nurs 28(1):63–69CrossRefPubMed McCormack P (1998) Quality of life and the right to die: an ethical dilemma. J Adv Nurs 28(1):63–69CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Laffey J (1996) Bioethical principles and care-based ethics in medical futility. Cancer Pract 4(1):41–46PubMed Laffey J (1996) Bioethical principles and care-based ethics in medical futility. Cancer Pract 4(1):41–46PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kinzbrunner B (1995) Ethical dilemma in hospice and palliative care. Support Care Cancer 3(1):28–36CrossRefPubMed Kinzbrunner B (1995) Ethical dilemma in hospice and palliative care. Support Care Cancer 3(1):28–36CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Goold S, Stern D (2006) Ethics and professionalism: what does a resident need to learn? Am J Bioeth 6(4):9–17CrossRefPubMed Goold S, Stern D (2006) Ethics and professionalism: what does a resident need to learn? Am J Bioeth 6(4):9–17CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mueller P, Koenig B (2006) Systematic review of ethics consultation: a route to curriculum development in post-graduate medical education. Am J Bioeth 6(4):21–23CrossRefPubMed Mueller P, Koenig B (2006) Systematic review of ethics consultation: a route to curriculum development in post-graduate medical education. Am J Bioeth 6(4):21–23CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference ABOG (2006) Guide to learning in gynecologic oncology. The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dallas, Texas ABOG (2006) Guide to learning in gynecologic oncology. The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dallas, Texas
11.
go back to reference Mehta P, Hester M, Safar A, Thompson R (2007) Ethics-in-oncology forums. J Cancer Educ 22(3):159–164CrossRefPubMed Mehta P, Hester M, Safar A, Thompson R (2007) Ethics-in-oncology forums. J Cancer Educ 22(3):159–164CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cain J, Elkins T, Bernard P (1994) The status of ethics education in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 83:315–320PubMed Cain J, Elkins T, Bernard P (1994) The status of ethics education in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 83:315–320PubMed
14.
go back to reference Downing M, Way D, Caniano D (1997) Results of a national survey on ethics education in general surgery residency programs. Am J Surg 174:365–368CrossRef Downing M, Way D, Caniano D (1997) Results of a national survey on ethics education in general surgery residency programs. Am J Surg 174:365–368CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Helft P, Eckles R, Torbeck L (2009) Ethics education in surgery residency programs: a review of the literature. J Surg Educ 66(1):35–42CrossRefPubMed Helft P, Eckles R, Torbeck L (2009) Ethics education in surgery residency programs: a review of the literature. J Surg Educ 66(1):35–42CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Culver C, Clouser K, Gert B, Brody H, Fletcher J, Jonsen A et al (1985) Basic curricular goals in medical ethics. N Engl J Med 312:253–256CrossRefPubMed Culver C, Clouser K, Gert B, Brody H, Fletcher J, Jonsen A et al (1985) Basic curricular goals in medical ethics. N Engl J Med 312:253–256CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lakhan S, Hamlat E, McNamee T, Laird C (2009) Time for a unified approach to medical ethics. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 4:13CrossRefPubMed Lakhan S, Hamlat E, McNamee T, Laird C (2009) Time for a unified approach to medical ethics. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 4:13CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ethics Consultation on a Gynecologic Oncology Service: An Opportunity for Physician Education
Authors
Matthew P. Schlumbrecht
Colleen M. Gallagher
Charlotte C. Sun
Lois M. Ramondetta
Diane C. Bodurka
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0154-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Journal of Cancer Education 1/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine