Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Published in: Translational Behavioral Medicine 2/2017

01-06-2017

Effects of a web-based intervention on women’s breast health behaviors

Authors: Deborah J. Bowen, Ph.D., Robert Robbins, Ph.D., Nigel Bush, Ph.D., Hendrika Meischke, Ph.D., Abi Ludwig, Jean Wooldridge, MPH

Published in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Helping women make choices to reduce cancer risk and to improve breast health behaviors is important, but the best ways to reach more people with intervention assistance is not known. To test the efficacy of a web-based intervention designed to help women make better breast health choices, we adapted our previously tested, successful breast health intervention package to be delivered on the Internet, and then we tested it in a randomized trial. We recruited women from the general public to be randomized to either an active intervention group or a delayed intervention control group. The intervention consisted of a specialized website providing tailored and personalized risk information to all participants, followed by offers of additional support if needed. Follow-up at one-year post randomization revealed significant improvements in mammography screening in intervention women compared with control women (improvement of 13 percentage points). The intervention effects were more powerful in women who increased breast health knowledge and decreased cancer worry during intervention. These data indicate that increases in mammography can be accomplished in population-based mostly insured samples by implementing this simple, low resource intensive intervention.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Bowen, D., et al. (2002). Results of an adjunct dietary intervention program in the Women’s health initiative. J Am Diet Assoc, 102(11), 1631–1637.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Bowen, D., et al. (1999). Participation in breast cancer risk counseling among women with a family history. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev, 8(7), 581–585.
3.
Bowen, D. J., & Beresford, S. A. (2002). Dietary interventions to prevent disease. Annu Rev Public Health, 23, 255–286.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bowen, D. J., et al. (2002). Effects of risk counseling on interest in breast cancer genetic testing for lower risk women. Genet Med, 4(5), 359–365.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Bowen, D. J., et al. (1998). Effects of counseling and ethnic identity on perceived risk and cancer worry in African American women. J Clin Psychol Med Settings, 05(3), 365–379.CrossRef
6.
Bowen, D. J., et al. (2003). Predicting breast cancer screening intentions and behavior with emotion and cognition. J Soc Clin Psychol, 22(2), 212–232.CrossRef
7.
Bowen, D. J., et al. (2003). Early experience with a web-based intervention to inform risk of breast cancer. J Health Psychol, 8(1), 175–186.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Bowen, D. J., et al. (2003). Jewish identity and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol, 9(1), 79–87.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Esplen, M. J., et al. (2000). Supportive-expressive group intervention for women who test positive for BRCA 1/2. Psycho-Oncology, 9(5 Suppl), S1–106.
10.
Esplen, M. J., et al. (1998). A group therapy approach to facilitate integration of risk information for women at risk for breast cancer. Can J Psychiatr, 43(4), 375–380.CrossRef
11.
Esplen, M. J., et al. (2000). A supportive-expressive group intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer: results of a phase II study. Psycho-Oncology, 9(3), 243–252.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Lerman, C., Audrain, J., & Croyle, R. T. (1994). DNA-testing for heritable breast cancer risks: lessons from traditional genetic counseling. Ann Behav Med, 16(4), 327.
13.
Lerman, C., et al. (1997). Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. J Natl Cancer Inst, 89(2), 148–157.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Lerman, C., et al. (1999). Racial differences in testing motivation and psychological distress following pretest education for BRCA1 gene testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev, 8(4 Pt 2), 361–367.
15.
Lerman, C., Kash, K., & Stefanek, M. (1994). Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 16, 171–176.
16.
Lerman, C., et al. (1995). Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst, 87(4), 286–292.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Lerman, C., et al. (1996). A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style. Health Psychol, 15(2), 75–83.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Taplin, S., Anderman, C., & Grothaus, L. (1989). Breast cancer risk and participation in mammographic screening. Am J Public Health, 79(11), 1494–1498.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Taplin, S. H., et al. (2000). Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst, 92(3), 233–242.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kendall, C., & Hailey, B. J. (1993). The relative effectiveness of three reminder letters on making and keeping mammogram appointments. Behav Med, 19(1), 29–34.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Lerman, C., & Schwartz, M. (1993). Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 28(2), 145–155.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Bowen, D.J., et al. (2010) Effects of a public health intervention on women’s breast health behaviors. Health Education and Behavior, xxx, xxx-xxx.
23.
Abrams, D. B., et al. (1996). Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: a combined stepped-care and matching model. Ann Behav Med, 18(4), 290–304.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Bowen, D. J., et al. (2004). Breast cancer risk counseling improves women’s functioning. Patient Educ Couns, 53(1), 79–86.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Rabin, B. A., et al. (2010). Dissemination and implementation research on community-based cancer prevention: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med, 38(4), 443–456.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Marcus, B. H., et al. (1998). Physical activity interventions using mass media, print media, and information technology. Am J Prev Med, 15(4), 362–378.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Oenema, A., Brug, J., & Lechner, L. (2001). Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res, 16(6), 647–660.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Cassell, M. M., Jackson, C., & Cheuvront, B. (1998). Health communication on the internet: an effective channel for health behavior change? J Health Commun, 3(1), 71–79.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Ferguson, T. (1995). Consumer health informatics. The Healthcare Forum Journal, 38(1).
30.
Green, M. J., & Fost, N. (1997). An interactive computer program for educating and counseling patients about genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. J Cancer Educ, 12(4), 204–208.PubMed
31.
Hoffman-Goetz, L., & Clarke, J. N. (2000). Quality of breast cancer sites on the World Wide Web. Can Journal Public Health, 91(4), 281–284.
32.
Wootton, J. C. (1997). The quality of information on women’s health on the Internet. Journal of women’s health / the official publication of the Society for the Advancement of Women’s Health Research, 6(5), 575–581.CrossRef
33.
Atienza, A. A., et al. (2010). E-health research and patient-centered care examining theory, methods, and application. Am J Prev Med, 38(1), 85–88.CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
Leventhal, H., Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. 1987.
36.
Decruyenaere, M., et al. (2000). Cognitive representations of breast cancer, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour: a theoretical perspective. Psychooncology, 9(6), 528–536.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Hoskins, K. F., et al. (1995). Assessment and counseling for women with a family history of breast cancer: a guide for clinicians. JAMA, 273(7), 577–585.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Shattuck-Eidens, D., et al. (1995). A collaborative survey of 80 mutations in the BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Implications for presymptomatic testing and screening. JAMA, 273(7), 535–541.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Gail, M. H., et al. (1989). Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst, 81(24), 1879–1886.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Burke, W., et al. (2000). Genetic counseling for women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer. Am J Med Genet, 90(5), 361–368.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Biesecker, B. B., et al. (1993). Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. JAMA, 269(15), 1970–1974.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Botkin, J. R., et al. (1996). A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychosocial effects of BRCA1 testing. J Natl Cancer Inst, 88(13), 872–882.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Andersen, M. R., & Urban, N. (1997). Physician gender and screening: do patient differences account for differences in mammography use? Women Health, 26(1), 29–39.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Lerman, C., et al. (1991). Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol, 10(4), 259–267.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993). The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ, 2(3), 217–227.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Hannon, M., et al. Measuring perceptions of breast cancer risk. Health Psychology, Under Review.
47.
Weinstein, N.D Taking care: understanding and encouraging self-protective behavior. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Helmes, A. W., Bowen, D. J., & Bengel, J. (2002). Patient preferences of decision-making in the context of genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Genet Med, 4(3), 150–157.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effects of a web-based intervention on women’s breast health behaviors
Authors
Deborah J. Bowen, Ph.D.
Robert Robbins, Ph.D.
Nigel Bush, Ph.D.
Hendrika Meischke, Ph.D.
Abi Ludwig
Jean Wooldridge, MPH
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Translational Behavioral Medicine / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0439-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Translational Behavioral Medicine 2/2017 Go to the issue

Case Study

The healthy living partnerships to prevent diabetes and the diabetes prevention program: a comparison of year 1 and 2 intervention results

Practice and Public Health Policies

Implementation of a tobacco-free workplace program at a local mental health authority

Original Research

The effects of framed messages for engaging adolescents with online smoking prevention interventions

Original Research

County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy: a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2)

Original Research

Recruiting pregnant smokers from Text4baby for a randomized controlled trial of Quit4baby

Practice and Public Health Policies

Behavioral and Social Sciences at the National Institutes of Health: adoption of research findings in health research and practice as a scientific priority