Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Translational Behavioral Medicine 2/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Research

School factors as barriers to and facilitators of a preventive intervention for pediatric type 2 diabetes

Authors: William J. Hall, MSW, Margaret Schneider, PhD, Deborah Thompson, PhD, Stella L. Volpe, PhD, Allan Steckler, DrPH, John M. Hall, BS, M. Randall Fisher, BS, RN,, the HEALTHY Study Group

Published in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

School-based interventions are essential to prevent pediatric obesity and type 2 diabetes. School environmental factors influence implementation of these interventions. This article examines how school factors acted as barriers to and facilitators of the HEALTHY intervention. The HEALTHY study was a cluster-randomized trial of a multicomponent intervention implemented in 21 schools. Interview data were analyzed to identify barriers and facilitators. Barriers included teacher frustration that intervention activities detracted from tested subjects, student resistance and misbehavior, classroom management problems, communication equipment problems, lack of teacher/staff engagement, high cost and limited availability of nutritious products, inadequate facility space, and large class sizes. Facilitators included teacher/staff engagement, effective classroom management, student engagement, schools with direct control over food service, support from school leaders, and adequate facilities and equipment. Contextual barriers and facilitators must be taken into account in the design and implementation of school-based health interventions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
2.
go back to reference Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass index for age among U.S. children and adolescents 2003–2006. JAMA. 2008;299:2401-2405.PubMedCrossRef Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass index for age among U.S. children and adolescents 2003–2006. JAMA. 2008;299:2401-2405.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hannon TS, Rao G, Arslanian SA. Childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 473-480.PubMedCrossRef Hannon TS, Rao G, Arslanian SA. Childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 473-480.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Venkat Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Sorensen SW, Williamson DF. Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA. 2003; 290: 1884-1890.CrossRef Venkat Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Sorensen SW, Williamson DF. Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA. 2003; 290: 1884-1890.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010; 59: 1-148. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010; 59: 1-148.
6.
go back to reference Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. National Survey of Children's Health, Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health (on-line). Available at: www.nschdata.org. Accessed January 5, 2012. Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. National Survey of Children's Health, Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health (on-line). Available at: www.​nschdata.​org. Accessed January 5, 2012.
7.
go back to reference Kann L, Telljohann SK, Wooley SF. Health education: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 408-434.PubMedCrossRef Kann L, Telljohann SK, Wooley SF. Health education: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 408-434.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lee SM, Burgeson CR, Fulton JE, Spain CG. Physical education and physical activity: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 435-463.PubMedCrossRef Lee SM, Burgeson CR, Fulton JE, Spain CG. Physical education and physical activity: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 435-463.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference O'Toole TP, Anderson S, Miller C, Guthrie J. Nutrition services and foods and beverages available at school: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 500-521.PubMedCrossRef O'Toole TP, Anderson S, Miller C, Guthrie J. Nutrition services and foods and beverages available at school: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 500-521.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference HEALTHY Study Group. HEALTHY study rationale, design and methods: moderating risk of type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic middle school students. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S4-S20. HEALTHY Study Group. HEALTHY study rationale, design and methods: moderating risk of type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic middle school students. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S4-S20.
11.
go back to reference Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008:465-486. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008:465-486.
12.
go back to reference Venditti EM, Elliot DL, Faith MS, et al. Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study behavior intervention component. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S44-S51.CrossRef Venditti EM, Elliot DL, Faith MS, et al. Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study behavior intervention component. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S44-S51.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference DeBar LL, Schneider M, Ford EG, et al. Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S52-S59.CrossRef DeBar LL, Schneider M, Ford EG, et al. Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S52-S59.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gillis B, Mobley C, Stadler DD, et al. Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study nutrition intervention component. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S29-S36.CrossRef Gillis B, Mobley C, Stadler DD, et al. Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study nutrition intervention component. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S29-S36.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference McMurray RG, Bassin S, Jago R, et al. Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S37-S43.CrossRef McMurray RG, Bassin S, Jago R, et al. Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S37-S43.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview. In: Steckler A, Linnan L, eds. Process Evaluation for Public Health Intervention and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002:1-23. Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview. In: Steckler A, Linnan L, eds. Process Evaluation for Public Health Intervention and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002:1-23.
17.
go back to reference Schneider M, Hall WJ, Hernandez AE, et al. Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S60-S67.CrossRef Schneider M, Hall WJ, Hernandez AE, et al. Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: S60-S67.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bowes D, Marquis M, Young W, Holowaty P, Isaac W. Process evaluation of a school-based intervention to increase physical activity and reduce bullying. Health Promot Pract. 2008; 10: 394-401.PubMedCrossRef Bowes D, Marquis M, Young W, Holowaty P, Isaac W. Process evaluation of a school-based intervention to increase physical activity and reduce bullying. Health Promot Pract. 2008; 10: 394-401.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gibson CA, Smith BK, DuBose KD, et al. Physical activity across the curriculum: year one process evaluation results. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 1-11.CrossRef Gibson CA, Smith BK, DuBose KD, et al. Physical activity across the curriculum: year one process evaluation results. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 1-11.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gittelsohn J, Merkle S, Story M, et al. School climate and implementation of the Pathways study. Prev Med. 2003; 37: S97-S106.PubMedCrossRef Gittelsohn J, Merkle S, Story M, et al. School climate and implementation of the Pathways study. Prev Med. 2003; 37: S97-S106.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Saunders RP, Ward D, Felton GM, Dowda M, Pate RR. Examining the link between program implementation and behavior outcomes in the lifestyle education for activity program (LEAP). Eval Program Plann. 2006; 29: 352-364.PubMedCrossRef Saunders RP, Ward D, Felton GM, Dowda M, Pate RR. Examining the link between program implementation and behavior outcomes in the lifestyle education for activity program (LEAP). Eval Program Plann. 2006; 29: 352-364.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Steckler A, Ethelbah B, Martin CJ, et al. Pathways process evaluation results: a school-based prevention trial to promote healthful diet and physical activity in American Indian third, fourth, and fifth grade students. Prev Med. 2003; 37: S80-S90.PubMedCrossRef Steckler A, Ethelbah B, Martin CJ, et al. Pathways process evaluation results: a school-based prevention trial to promote healthful diet and physical activity in American Indian third, fourth, and fifth grade students. Prev Med. 2003; 37: S80-S90.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Conway TL, et al. Environmental interventions for eating and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 24: 209-217.PubMedCrossRef Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Conway TL, et al. Environmental interventions for eating and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 24: 209-217.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ward DS, Saunders R, Felton GM, Williams E, Epping JN, Pate RR. Implementation of a school environment intervention to increase physical activity in high school girls. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21: 896-910.PubMedCrossRef Ward DS, Saunders R, Felton GM, Williams E, Epping JN, Pate RR. Implementation of a school environment intervention to increase physical activity in high school girls. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21: 896-910.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Young DR, Steckler A, Cohen S, et al. Process evaluation results from a school- and community-linked intervention: the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG). Health Educ Res. 2008; 23: 976-986.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Young DR, Steckler A, Cohen S, et al. Process evaluation results from a school- and community-linked intervention: the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG). Health Educ Res. 2008; 23: 976-986.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference HEALTHY Study Group. A school-based intervention for diabetes risk reduction. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 443-453.CrossRef HEALTHY Study Group. A school-based intervention for diabetes risk reduction. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 443-453.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hall WJ, Zeveloff A, Steckler A, et al. Process evaluation results for the HEALTHY physical education intervention. Health Educ Res. 2012; 27: 307-318.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hall WJ, Zeveloff A, Steckler A, et al. Process evaluation results for the HEALTHY physical education intervention. Health Educ Res. 2012; 27: 307-318.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mobley CC, Stadler DD, Staten MA, et al. Effect of nutrition changes on foods selected by students in a middle school-based diabetes prevention intervention program: The HEALTHY experience. J Sch Health. 2012; 82: 82-90. Mobley CC, Stadler DD, Staten MA, et al. Effect of nutrition changes on foods selected by students in a middle school-based diabetes prevention intervention program: The HEALTHY experience. J Sch Health. 2012; 82: 82-90.
29.
go back to reference Schneider M, DeBar L, Calingo A, et al. The effect of a communications campaign on middle school students' nutrition and physical activity: results of the HEALTHY study. J Health Commun. 2013; 18: 649-667. Schneider M, DeBar L, Calingo A, et al. The effect of a communications campaign on middle school students' nutrition and physical activity: results of the HEALTHY study. J Health Commun. 2013; 18: 649-667.
Metadata
Title
School factors as barriers to and facilitators of a preventive intervention for pediatric type 2 diabetes
Authors
William J. Hall, MSW
Margaret Schneider, PhD
Deborah Thompson, PhD
Stella L. Volpe, PhD
Allan Steckler, DrPH
John M. Hall, BS
M. Randall Fisher, BS, RN,
the HEALTHY Study Group
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Translational Behavioral Medicine / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0226-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Translational Behavioral Medicine 2/2014 Go to the issue