Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2022

01-04-2022 | Reports of Original Investigations

Noise in the operating room during induction of anesthesia: impact of a quality improvement initiative

Authors: Charles V. Yu, BSc (Pharm), MD, Julena Foglia, MD, FRCPC, Paul Yen, MD, Trina Montemurro, MD, FRCPC, Stephan K. W. Schwarz, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Su-Yin MacDonell, MD, MSc(Perioperative Medicine), FRCPC

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Noise in the operating room (OR) is common and associated with negative effects on anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patient outcomes. Induction of anesthesia is among the loudest perioperative periods. Despite its critical nature, there is little data on noise levels during induction, associated patient and anesthesiologist satisfaction, and the effects of noise reduction strategies.

Methods

We conducted a two-part prospective interventional quality improvement project on the care of adult patients receiving general anesthesia for elective noncardiac surgery. For part A, we measured average and peak noise (dB[A]) levels during anesthesia induction in N = 100 cases and administered a satisfaction questionnaire to anesthesiologists. We then applied a multidisciplinary educational program to OR personnel on active noise reduction strategies and subsequently collected data during N = 109 cases in a post-intervention phase. For part B, we administered satisfaction questionnaires to N = 100 patients pre- vs postintervention, respectively.

Results

Median [interquartile range] noise levels throughout induction were 66.0 [62.5–68.6] dB(A) preintervention vs 63.5 [60.1–65.4] dB[A] post-intervention (Hodges–Lehmann estimator of the difference, − 2.7 dB[A]; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 4.0 to − 1.5; P < 0.001). Peak noise levels during induction were 87.3 [84.0–90.5] dB(A) preintervention and 86.2 [81.8–89.3] dB(A) postintervention (Hodges–Lehmann estimator of the difference, − 1.8 dB[A]; 95% CI, − 3.3 to − 0.3; P = 0.02). Noise-related anesthesiologist satisfaction postintervention was significantly improved in multiple domains, including assessment of noise having distracted anesthesiologists. Patient satisfaction was high pre-intervention and did not significantly improve further.

Conclusion

In this quality improvement project, average noise levels during induction of anesthesia, anesthesiologist satisfaction, and anesthesiologists’ perceived ability to perform were improved following a multidisciplinary educational program on noise reduction in the OR.

Study registration

www.​ClinicalTrials.​gov (NCT04204785); registered 19 December 2019.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
EQUATOR Network. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. Available from URL: https://​www.​equator-network.​org/​reporting-guidelines/​squire/​ (accessed November 2021).
 
2
Wilson DB. George Mason University. Practical Meta-Analysis Effect Size Calculator. Available from URL: https://​www.​campbellcollabor​ation.​org/​escalc/​html/​EffectSizeCalcul​ator-SMD-main.​php (accessed November 2021).
 
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Ginsberg SH, Pantin E, Kraidin J, Solina A, Panjwani S, Yang G. Noise levels in modern operating rooms during surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27: 528-30.CrossRef Ginsberg SH, Pantin E, Kraidin J, Solina A, Panjwani S, Yang G. Noise levels in modern operating rooms during surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27: 528-30.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hasfeldt D, Laerkner E, Birkelund R. Noise in the operating room-what do we know? A review of the literature. J Perianesthesia Nurs 2010; 25: 380-6.CrossRef Hasfeldt D, Laerkner E, Birkelund R. Noise in the operating room-what do we know? A review of the literature. J Perianesthesia Nurs 2010; 25: 380-6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Liu EH, Tan SM. Patients’ perception of sound levels in the surgical suite. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 298-302.CrossRef Liu EH, Tan SM. Patients’ perception of sound levels in the surgical suite. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 298-302.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Degrandi Oliveira CR, Nogueira Arenas GW. Occupational exposure to noise pollution in anesthesiology. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2012; 62: 253-61.CrossRef Degrandi Oliveira CR, Nogueira Arenas GW. Occupational exposure to noise pollution in anesthesiology. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2012; 62: 253-61.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fritsch MH, Chacko CE, Patterson EB. Operating room sound level hazards for patients and physicians. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 715-21.CrossRef Fritsch MH, Chacko CE, Patterson EB. Operating room sound level hazards for patients and physicians. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 715-21.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Broom MA, Capek AL, Carachi P, Akeroyd MA, Hilditch G. Critical phase distractions in anaesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 175-9.CrossRef Broom MA, Capek AL, Carachi P, Akeroyd MA, Hilditch G. Critical phase distractions in anaesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 175-9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McNeer RR, Bennett CL, Bodzin Horn D, Dudaryk R. Factors affecting acoustics and speech intelligibility in the operating room: size matters. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1978-85.CrossRef McNeer RR, Bennett CL, Bodzin Horn D, Dudaryk R. Factors affecting acoustics and speech intelligibility in the operating room: size matters. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1978-85.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stevenson RA, Schlesinger JJ, Wallace MT. Effects of divided attention and operating room noise on perception of pulse oximeter pitch changes: a laboratory study. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 376-81.CrossRef Stevenson RA, Schlesinger JJ, Wallace MT. Effects of divided attention and operating room noise on perception of pulse oximeter pitch changes: a laboratory study. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 376-81.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, et al. Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216: 933-8.CrossRef Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, et al. Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216: 933-8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Engelmann C, Neis JP, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Ure BM. A noise-reduction program in a pediatric operation theatre is associated with surgeon’s benefits and a reduced rate of complications: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 1025-33.CrossRef Engelmann C, Neis JP, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Ure BM. A noise-reduction program in a pediatric operation theatre is associated with surgeon’s benefits and a reduced rate of complications: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 1025-33.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kurmann A, Peter M, Tschan F, Mühlemann K, Candinas D, Beldi G. Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1021-5.CrossRef Kurmann A, Peter M, Tschan F, Mühlemann K, Candinas D, Beldi G. Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1021-5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dholakia S, Jeans JP, Khalid U, Dholakia S, D’Souza C, Nemeth K. The association of noise and surgical-site infection in day-case hernia repairs. Surgery 2015; 157: 1153-6.CrossRef Dholakia S, Jeans JP, Khalid U, Dholakia S, D’Souza C, Nemeth K. The association of noise and surgical-site infection in day-case hernia repairs. Surgery 2015; 157: 1153-6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hepner DL, Bader AM, Hurwitz S, Gustafson M, Tsen LC. Patient satisfaction with preoperative assessment in a preoperative assessment testing clinic. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1099-105.CrossRef Hepner DL, Bader AM, Hurwitz S, Gustafson M, Tsen LC. Patient satisfaction with preoperative assessment in a preoperative assessment testing clinic. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1099-105.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shapiro FE, Everett LL, Urman RD. Quality management in outpatient surgical care. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2014; 52: 97-108.CrossRef Shapiro FE, Everett LL, Urman RD. Quality management in outpatient surgical care. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2014; 52: 97-108.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fung D, Cohen MM, Stewart S, Davies A. What determines patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation in a community hospital setting? Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1644-50.CrossRef Fung D, Cohen MM, Stewart S, Davies A. What determines patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation in a community hospital setting? Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1644-50.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Le May S, Hardy JF, Taillefer MC, Dupuis G. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia services. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 153-61.CrossRef Le May S, Hardy JF, Taillefer MC, Dupuis G. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia services. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 153-61.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fink DJ. What is a safe noise level for the public? Am J Public Health 2017; 107: 44-5.CrossRef Fink DJ. What is a safe noise level for the public? Am J Public Health 2017; 107: 44-5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Darbyshire JL, Müller-Trapet M, Cheer J, Fazi FM, Young JD. Mapping sources of noise in an intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 1018-25.CrossRef Darbyshire JL, Müller-Trapet M, Cheer J, Fazi FM, Young JD. Mapping sources of noise in an intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 1018-25.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mirza R, Kirchner DB, Dobie RA, Crawford J; ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 60: e498-501. Mirza R, Kirchner DB, Dobie RA, Crawford J; ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 60: e498-501. 
Metadata
Title
Noise in the operating room during induction of anesthesia: impact of a quality improvement initiative
Authors
Charles V. Yu, BSc (Pharm), MD
Julena Foglia, MD, FRCPC
Paul Yen, MD
Trina Montemurro, MD, FRCPC
Stephan K. W. Schwarz, MD, PhD, FRCPC
Su-Yin MacDonell, MD, MSc(Perioperative Medicine), FRCPC
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02187-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2022 Go to the issue