Skip to main content
Top
Literature
3.
go back to reference Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Changes in older persons’ preferences regarding treatment outcomes over time. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 890-5.CrossRef Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Changes in older persons’ preferences regarding treatment outcomes over time. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 890-5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Auriemma CL, Nguyen CA, Bronheim R, et al. Stability of end-of-life preferences. A systematic review of the evidence. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 1085-92. Auriemma CL, Nguyen CA, Bronheim R, et al. Stability of end-of-life preferences. A systematic review of the evidence. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 1085-92.
5.
go back to reference Taneja R, Faden LY, Schulz V, et al. Advance care planning in community dwellers: a constructivist grounded theory study of values, preferences and conflicts. Palliat Med 2019; 33: 66-73.CrossRef Taneja R, Faden LY, Schulz V, et al. Advance care planning in community dwellers: a constructivist grounded theory study of values, preferences and conflicts. Palliat Med 2019; 33: 66-73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
In reply: “Nature exposed to our method of questioning”—resuscitation preferences and complex interventions
Authors
Ravi Taneja, MD, FRCA, FRCPC
Kristen A. Bishop, MSc
Mark Goldszmidt, MD, PhD, FRCPC
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-01999-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 8/2021 Go to the issue