Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Reports of Original Investigations

Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017

Authors: Alana M. Flexman, MD, FRCPC, Arun Parmar, BHSc(c), Gianni R. Lorello, BSc, MD, MSc (Med Ed), CIP, FRCPC

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Females remain under-represented in academic anesthesiology. Our objectives were to investigate gender differences over time in the first and last authors of published articles as well as corresponding citation rates in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (CJA).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of first and last authors’ gender from editorials and original articles published in the CJA in a sample of one calendar year of each decade between 1954 to 2017. We analyzed the relationships between author gender, year of publication, article type, and number of citations.

Results

Out of 639 articles identified, 542 (85%) were original investigations and 97 (15%) were editorials. Where gender could be confidently identified, the majority (461/571, 81%) of first authors were male. Although there was an increase in the proportion of female first authors over time, this increase was outpaced by the overall increase in female anesthesiologists in Canada. Original articles received more citations and were more likely to have a female first author than editorial articles were. An original article with a female first author resulted in 0.34 (95% confidence interval, 0.28 to 0.39; P < 0.001) more citations per article than a male first author when adjusting for year of publication.

Conclusions

Our study shows that, despite a slow increase over time, female authors are under-represented relative to male authors in the CJA and relative to the changing demographics of anesthesiologists in Canada. The reasons for this disparity are multifactorial and further research is needed to identify effective solutions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Leslie K, Hopf HW, Houston P, O’Sullivan E. Women, minorities, and leadership in anesthesiology: take the pledge. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1394-6.CrossRefPubMed Leslie K, Hopf HW, Houston P, O’Sullivan E. Women, minorities, and leadership in anesthesiology: take the pledge. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1394-6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Toledo P, Duce L, Adams J, Ross VH, Thompson KM, Wong CA. Diversity in the American Society of Anesthesiologists leadership. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1611-6.CrossRefPubMed Toledo P, Duce L, Adams J, Ross VH, Thompson KM, Wong CA. Diversity in the American Society of Anesthesiologists leadership. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1611-6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Straehley CJ, Longo P. Family issues affecting women in medicine, particularly women surgeons. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 695-8.CrossRefPubMed Straehley CJ, Longo P. Family issues affecting women in medicine, particularly women surgeons. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 695-8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Colletti LM, Mulholland MW, Sonnad SS. Perceived obstacles to career success for women in academic surgery. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 972-7.CrossRefPubMed Colletti LM, Mulholland MW, Sonnad SS. Perceived obstacles to career success for women in academic surgery. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 972-7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wright AL, Schwindt LA, Bassford TL, et al. Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Acad Med 2003; 78: 500-8.CrossRefPubMed Wright AL, Schwindt LA, Bassford TL, et al. Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Acad Med 2003; 78: 500-8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sexton KW, Hocking KM, Wise E, et al. Women in academic surgery: the pipeline is busted. J Surg Educ 2012; 69: 84-90.CrossRefPubMed Sexton KW, Hocking KM, Wise E, et al. Women in academic surgery: the pipeline is busted. J Surg Educ 2012; 69: 84-90.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Silver JK, Slocum CS, Bank AM, et al. Where are the women? The underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies. PM&R 2017; 9: 804-15.CrossRef Silver JK, Slocum CS, Bank AM, et al. Where are the women? The underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies. PM&R 2017; 9: 804-15.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Silver JK, Poorman JA, Reilly JM, Spector ND, Goldstein R, Zafonte RD. Assessment of women physicians among authors of perspective-type articles published in high-impact pediatric journals. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1: e180802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silver JK, Poorman JA, Reilly JM, Spector ND, Goldstein R, Zafonte RD. Assessment of women physicians among authors of perspective-type articles published in high-impact pediatric journals. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1: e180802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Long MT, Leszczynski A, Thompson KD, Wasan SK, Calderwood AH. Female authorship in major academic gastroenterology journals: a look over 20 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81(1440-7): e3. Long MT, Leszczynski A, Thompson KD, Wasan SK, Calderwood AH. Female authorship in major academic gastroenterology journals: a look over 20 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81(1440-7): e3.
14.
16.
go back to reference Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD. Is there gender bias in JAMA’s peer review process? JAMA 1994; 272: 139-42.CrossRefPubMed Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD. Is there gender bias in JAMA’s peer review process? JAMA 1994; 272: 139-42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Carnes M, Morrissey C, Geller SE. Women“s health and women”s leadership in academic medicine: hitting the same glass ceiling? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17: 1453-62.CrossRefPubMed Carnes M, Morrissey C, Geller SE. Women“s health and women”s leadership in academic medicine: hitting the same glass ceiling? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17: 1453-62.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Reed V, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Career obstacles for women in medicine: an overview. Med Educ 2001; 35: 139-47.CrossRefPubMed Reed V, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Career obstacles for women in medicine: an overview. Med Educ 2001; 35: 139-47.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Files JA, Mayer AP, Ko MG, et al. Speaker introductions at internal medicine grand rounds: forms of address reveal gender bias. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017; 26: 413-9.CrossRefPubMed Files JA, Mayer AP, Ko MG, et al. Speaker introductions at internal medicine grand rounds: forms of address reveal gender bias. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017; 26: 413-9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference DuVal D, McKnight D. In reply to “Because it’s 2018: women in Canadian anesthesiology”. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 955.CrossRefPubMed DuVal D, McKnight D. In reply to “Because it’s 2018: women in Canadian anesthesiology”. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 955.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Seemann NM, Webster F, Holden HA, et al. Women in academic surgery: why is the playing field still not level? Am J Surg 2016; 211: 343-9.CrossRefPubMed Seemann NM, Webster F, Holden HA, et al. Women in academic surgery: why is the playing field still not level? Am J Surg 2016; 211: 343-9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dezsö CL, Gaddis Ross D. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strateg Manag J 2012; 33: 1072-89.CrossRef Dezsö CL, Gaddis Ross D. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strateg Manag J 2012; 33: 1072-89.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Marsch J. Women in science-what’s the world missing. Eur Sci Edit 2012; 38: 2. Marsch J. Women in science-what’s the world missing. Eur Sci Edit 2012; 38: 2.
26.
go back to reference Hoover EL. Mentoring women in academic surgery: overcoming institutional barriers to success. J Natl Med Assoc 2006; 98: 1542-5.PubMedPubMedCentral Hoover EL. Mentoring women in academic surgery: overcoming institutional barriers to success. J Natl Med Assoc 2006; 98: 1542-5.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Jagsi R, Griffith KA, DeCastro RA, Ubel P. Sex, role models, and specialty choices among graduates of US medical schools in 2006-2008. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218: 345-52.CrossRefPubMed Jagsi R, Griffith KA, DeCastro RA, Ubel P. Sex, role models, and specialty choices among graduates of US medical schools in 2006-2008. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218: 345-52.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Zakus P, Gelb AW, Flexman AM. A survey of mentorship among Canadian anesthesiology residents. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 972-8.CrossRefPubMed Zakus P, Gelb AW, Flexman AM. A survey of mentorship among Canadian anesthesiology residents. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 972-8.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Levine RB, Mechaber HF, Reddy ST, Cayea D, Harrison RA. “A good career choice for women”: female medical students’ mentoring experiences a multi-institutional qualitative study. Acad Med 2013; 88: 527-34.CrossRefPubMed Levine RB, Mechaber HF, Reddy ST, Cayea D, Harrison RA. “A good career choice for women”: female medical students’ mentoring experiences a multi-institutional qualitative study. Acad Med 2013; 88: 527-34.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Mayer KL, Perez RV, Ho HS. Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program. J Surg Res 2001; 98: 71-5.CrossRefPubMed Mayer KL, Perez RV, Ho HS. Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program. J Surg Res 2001; 98: 71-5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sukhera J, Milne A, Teunissen PW, Lingard L, Watling C. Adaptive reinventing: implicit bias and the co-construction of social change. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2018; 23: 587-99.CrossRefPubMed Sukhera J, Milne A, Teunissen PW, Lingard L, Watling C. Adaptive reinventing: implicit bias and the co-construction of social change. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2018; 23: 587-99.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Budden AE, Tregenza T, Aarssen LW, Koricheva J, Leimu R, Lortie CJ. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 4-6.CrossRefPubMed Budden AE, Tregenza T, Aarssen LW, Koricheva J, Leimu R, Lortie CJ. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 4-6.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Webb TJ, O’Hara B, Freckleton RP. Does double-blind review benefit female authors? Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 351-3.CrossRefPubMed Webb TJ, O’Hara B, Freckleton RP. Does double-blind review benefit female authors? Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 351-3.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: e18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: e18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017
Authors
Alana M. Flexman, MD, FRCPC
Arun Parmar, BHSc(c)
Gianni R. Lorello, BSc, MD, MSc (Med Ed), CIP, FRCPC
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01328-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 5/2019 Go to the issue