Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Editorials

Statistical reporting and table construction guidelines for publication in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Authors: Philip M. Jones, MD, MSc, Gregory L. Bryson, MD, MSc, Steven B. Backman, MDCM, PhD, Sangeeta Mehta, MD, Hilary P. Grocott, MD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

When publishing scientific information, data must be presented accurately, consistently, and transparently for maximally effective communication. At the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, we commonly see problems in the reporting of results in the text and tables of manuscripts submitted for publication. Some of the common problems we encounter include:
  • Effect sizes, such as relative risks (for binary variables) or risk differences (for binary or continuous variables) are not presented.
  • The uncertainty of effect sizes is not presented with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
  • Information (e.g., weight or height) is presented in either an overly precise (and clinically irrelevant) manner, by using two (or more) decimal places, or a falsely precise manner, by using decimal places that go beyond the precision of the initial measurement.
  • P values are reported using too many decimal places.
  • P values are reported in an imprecise manner (P < 0.05 or P = NS).
  • The specific statistical test(s) that pertain to the primary (and secondary) outcome are not reported.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Council of Science Editors. Scientific Style and Format – The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers – 8th Edition. ISBN: 978-0226116495. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2014. Council of Science Editors. Scientific Style and Format – The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers – 8th Edition. ISBN: 978-0226116495. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Chang D. Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2002; 287: 2813-4.CrossRefPubMed Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Chang D. Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2002; 287: 2813-4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 1064-9.CrossRefPubMed Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 1064-9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ. Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with “‘difficult’” distributions. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 360-5.CrossRefPubMed Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ. Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with “‘difficult’” distributions. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 360-5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Statistical reporting and table construction guidelines for publication in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
Authors
Philip M. Jones, MD, MSc
Gregory L. Bryson, MD, MSc
Steven B. Backman, MDCM, PhD
Sangeeta Mehta, MD
Hilary P. Grocott, MD
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-017-1024-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 2/2018 Go to the issue