Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Reports of Original Investigations

Electronic medical record interventions and recurrent perioperative antibiotic administration: a before-and-after study

Authors: Alexander Hincker, MD, Arbi Ben Abdallah, DES, PhD, Michael Avidan, MBBCH, Penka Candelario, BS, Daniel Helsten, MD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Perioperative antibiotics decrease rates of surgical-site infections. Numerous interventions have improved administration of the first antibiotic dose; however, failures in the administration of subsequent doses frequently occur. We hypothesized that modifications to the electronic medical record (EMR) would improve the administration of the second antibiotic dose and that such improvements would be sustained over time.

Methods

This historical cohort before-and-after study of multipronged alerts in the EMR analyzed 1,348 operations on adult patients. The operations lasted ≥ 240 min, utilized cefazolin as the perioperative antibiotic—constituting 1,348 second and 182 third intraoperative antibiotic doses—and did not involve cardiopulmonary bypass. A decision support intervention provided dosing recommendations when clinicians documented antibiotics. The reminder intervention displayed a continuous bar in the EMR, starting at the time the antibiotics were dosed and ending 15 min before subsequent doses were indicated. The primary endpoints of the study were the change in the proportion of correctly administered second dose of cefazolin, given in accordance with hospital guidelines in the month after implementing the intervention, and whether any improvements declined by three to seven months after implementation.

Results

Pre-intervention, 51.4% of second doses of cefazolin were correctly administered. In the immediate post-intervention period, 68.5% were correctly administered, representing a significant absolute improvement of 17.1% (95% confidence interval, 8.1 to 26.1; P < 0.001). Rates did not decline over time; clinicians correctly administered 73.3% of doses in the delayed post-intervention period (P < 0.001 vs pre-intervention).

Conclusions

These inexpensive nonintrusive interventions to the EMR provided modest lasting improvements in proper administration of repeated doses of cefazolin. The fact that only approximately 70% compliance was reached highlights the difficulty in addressing this deficiency.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Najjar PA, Smink DS. Prophylactic antibiotics and prevention of surgical site infections. Surg Clin North Am 2015; 95: 269-83.CrossRefPubMed Najjar PA, Smink DS. Prophylactic antibiotics and prevention of surgical site infections. Surg Clin North Am 2015; 95: 269-83.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hawn TH, Vick CC, Richman J, et al. Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 494-9; discussion 499-501. Hawn TH, Vick CC, Richman J, et al. Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 494-9; discussion 499-501.
3.
go back to reference Clarke JS, Condon RE, Bartlett JG, Gorbach SL, Nichols RL, Ochi S. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations: results of prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Ann Surg 1977; 186: 251-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clarke JS, Condon RE, Bartlett JG, Gorbach SL, Nichols RL, Ochi S. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations: results of prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Ann Surg 1977; 186: 251-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Pavel A, Smith RL, Ballard CA, Larsen IJ. Prophylactic antibiotics in clean orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56: 777-82.CrossRefPubMed Pavel A, Smith RL, Ballard CA, Larsen IJ. Prophylactic antibiotics in clean orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56: 777-82.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gouvea M, Novaes CO, Pereira DM, Iglesias AC. Adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a review. Braz J Infect Dis 2015; 19: 517-24.CrossRefPubMed Gouvea M, Novaes CO, Pereira DM, Iglesias AC. Adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a review. Braz J Infect Dis 2015; 19: 517-24.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nair BG, Newman SF, Peterson GN, Wu WY, Schwid HA. Feeback mechanisms including real-time electronic alerts to achieve near 100% timely prophylactic antibiotic administration in surgical cases. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1293-300.CrossRefPubMed Nair BG, Newman SF, Peterson GN, Wu WY, Schwid HA. Feeback mechanisms including real-time electronic alerts to achieve near 100% timely prophylactic antibiotic administration in surgical cases. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1293-300.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference O’Reilly M, Talsma A, VanRiper S, Kheterpal S, Burney R. An anesthesia information system designed to provide physician-specific feedback improves timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 908-12.CrossRefPubMed O’Reilly M, Talsma A, VanRiper S, Kheterpal S, Burney R. An anesthesia information system designed to provide physician-specific feedback improves timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 908-12.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wax DB, Beilin Y, Levin M, Chadha N, Krol M, Reich DL. The effect of an interactive visual reminder in an anesthesia information management system on timeliness of prophylactic antibiotic administration. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1462-6.CrossRefPubMed Wax DB, Beilin Y, Levin M, Chadha N, Krol M, Reich DL. The effect of an interactive visual reminder in an anesthesia information management system on timeliness of prophylactic antibiotic administration. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1462-6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wimmer C, Gluch H, Franzreb M, Ogon M. Predisposing factors for infection in spine surgery: a survey of 850 spinal procedures. J Spinal Disord 1998; 11: 124-8.PubMed Wimmer C, Gluch H, Franzreb M, Ogon M. Predisposing factors for infection in spine surgery: a survey of 850 spinal procedures. J Spinal Disord 1998; 11: 124-8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Leong G, Wilson J, Charlett A. Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: comparison of English and US data. J Hosp Infect 2006; 63: 255-62.CrossRefPubMed Leong G, Wilson J, Charlett A. Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: comparison of English and US data. J Hosp Infect 2006; 63: 255-62.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, Jones RS. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 865-77.CrossRefPubMed Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, Jones RS. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 865-77.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013; 70: 195-283.CrossRefPubMed Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013; 70: 195-283.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Levy SM, Phatak UR, Tsao KJ, et al. What is the quality of reporting of studies of interventions to increase compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis? J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 770-9.CrossRefPubMed Levy SM, Phatak UR, Tsao KJ, et al. What is the quality of reporting of studies of interventions to increase compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis? J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 770-9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nemeth TA, Beilman GJ, Hamlin CL, Chipman JG. Preoperative verification of timely antimicrobial prophylaxis does not improve compliance with guidelines. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2010; 11: 387-91.CrossRef Nemeth TA, Beilman GJ, Hamlin CL, Chipman JG. Preoperative verification of timely antimicrobial prophylaxis does not improve compliance with guidelines. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2010; 11: 387-91.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lingard L, Regehr G, Cartmill C, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative team briefing: a new communication routine results in improved clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20: 475-82.CrossRefPubMed Lingard L, Regehr G, Cartmill C, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative team briefing: a new communication routine results in improved clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20: 475-82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rosenberg AD, Wambold D, Kraemer L, et al. Ensuring appropriate timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 226-32.CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg AD, Wambold D, Kraemer L, et al. Ensuring appropriate timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 226-32.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kao LS, Lew DF, Doyle PD, et al. A tale of 2 hospitals: a staggered cohort study of targeted interventions to improve compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. Surgery 2010; 148: 255-62.CrossRefPubMed Kao LS, Lew DF, Doyle PD, et al. A tale of 2 hospitals: a staggered cohort study of targeted interventions to improve compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. Surgery 2010; 148: 255-62.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference McHugh SM, Corrigan MA, Dimitrov BD, et al. Preventing infection in general surgery: improvements through education of surgeons by surgeons. J Hosp Infect 2011; 78: 312-6.CrossRefPubMed McHugh SM, Corrigan MA, Dimitrov BD, et al. Preventing infection in general surgery: improvements through education of surgeons by surgeons. J Hosp Infect 2011; 78: 312-6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL, et al. Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Colll Surg 2012; 215: 193-200.CrossRef Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL, et al. Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Colll Surg 2012; 215: 193-200.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Electronic medical record interventions and recurrent perioperative antibiotic administration: a before-and-after study
Authors
Alexander Hincker, MD
Arbi Ben Abdallah, DES, PhD
Michael Avidan, MBBCH
Penka Candelario, BS
Daniel Helsten, MD
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-017-0885-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2017 Go to the issue