Skip to main content
Top
Footnotes
1
alltrials.​net (accessed February 2016).
 
2
www.​compare-trials.​org (accessed February 2016).
 
3
www.​alltrials.​net (accessed February 2016).
 
4
www.​compare-trials.​org (accessed February 2016).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis. In: Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M (Eds). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assesment and Adjustments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2006; DOI:10.1002/0470870168. Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis. In: Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M (Eds). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assesment and Adjustments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2006; DOI:10.​1002/​0470870168.
2.
go back to reference Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 638-41.CrossRef Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 638-41.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867-72.CrossRefPubMed Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867-72.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010; 303: 2058-64.CrossRefPubMed Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010; 303: 2058-64.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Prasad V, Vandross A, Toomey C, et al. A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices. Mayo Clin Proc 2013; 88: 790-8.CrossRefPubMed Prasad V, Vandross A, Toomey C, et al. A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices. Mayo Clin Proc 2013; 88: 790-8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Decullier E, Lheritier V, Chapuis F. Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2005; 331: 19-20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Decullier E, Lheritier V, Chapuis F. Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2005; 331: 19-20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Dickersin K, Min YI. NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993; Doc No 50: PMID: 8306005. Dickersin K, Min YI. NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993; Doc No 50: PMID: 8306005.
8.
go back to reference Schmucker C, Schell LK, Portalupi S, et al. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries. PLoS One 2014; 9: e114023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schmucker C, Schell LK, Portalupi S, et al. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries. PLoS One 2014; 9: e114023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 252-60.CrossRefPubMed Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 252-60.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009; 302: 977-84.CrossRefPubMed Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009; 302: 977-84.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference De Oliveira GS, Jr Jung MJ, McCarthy RJ. Discrepancies between randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of corresponding manuscripts reported in anesthesiology journals. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 1030-3.CrossRefPubMed De Oliveira GS, Jr Jung MJ, McCarthy RJ. Discrepancies between randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of corresponding manuscripts reported in anesthesiology journals. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 1030-3.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Chong SW. Collins NF, Wu CY, Liskaser GM, Peyton PJ. The relationship between study findings and publication outcome in anesthesia research: a retrospective observational study examining publication bias. Can J Anesth 2016; 63: this issue. DOI:10.1007/s12630-016-0631-z Chong SW. Collins NF, Wu CY, Liskaser GM, Peyton PJ. The relationship between study findings and publication outcome in anesthesia research: a retrospective observational study examining publication bias. Can J Anesth 2016; 63: this issue. DOI:10.​1007/​s12630-016-0631-z
16.
go back to reference Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L. Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 681-4.CrossRefPubMed Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L. Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 681-4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature: shifting the focus from the “positive” to the “truth”
Author
Philip M. Jones, MD
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0632-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2016 Go to the issue