Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Reports of Original Investigations

Accuracy of manual entry of drug administration data into an anesthesia information management system

Authors: Alexander Avidan, MD, Koren Dotan, MD, Charles Weissman, MD, Matan J. Cohen, MD, MPH, Phillip D. Levin, MB, BChir

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Data on drug administration are entered manually into anesthesia information management systems (AIMS). This study examined whether these data are accurate regarding drug name, dose administered, and time of administration, and whether the stage of anesthesia influences data accuracy.

Methods

Real-time observational data on drug administration during elective operations were compared with computerized information on drug administration entered by anesthesiologists. A trained observer (K.D.) performed the observations.

Results

Data were collected during 57 operations which included 596 separate occasions of drug administration by 22 anesthesiologists. No AIMS records were found for 90 (15.1%) occasions of drug administration (omissions), while there were 11 (1.8%) AIMS records where drug administration was not observed. The AIMS and observer data matched for drug name on 495 of 596 (83.1%) occasions, for dose on 439 of 495 (92.5%) occasions, and for time on 476 of 495 (96.2%) occasions. Amongst the 90 omitted records, 34 (37.8%) were for vasoactive drugs with 24 (27.7%) for small doses of hypnotics. Omissions occurred mostly during maintenance: 50 of 153 (24.6%), followed by induction: 30 of 325 (9.2%) and emergence: 10 of 57 (17.5%) (P < 0.001). Time and dose inaccuracies occurred mainly during induction, followed by maintenance and emergence; time inaccuracies were 7/325 (8.3%), 10/203 (4.9%), and 0/57 (0%), respectively (P = 0.07), and dose inaccuracies were 15/325 (4.6%), 3/203 (1.5%), and 1/57 (1.7%), respectively (P = 0.11).

Conclusion

The range of accuracy varies when anesthesiologists manually enter drug administration data into an AIMS. Charting omissions represent the largest cause of inaccuracy, principally by omissions of records for vasopressors and small doses of hypnotic drugs. Manually entered drug administration data are not without errors. Accuracy of entering drug administration data remains the responsibility of the anesthesiologist.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balust J, Egger Halbeis CB, Macario A. Prevalence of anaesthesia information management systems in university-affiliated hospitals in Europe. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 202-8.PubMedCrossRef Balust J, Egger Halbeis CB, Macario A. Prevalence of anaesthesia information management systems in university-affiliated hospitals in Europe. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 202-8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kadry B, Feaster WW, Macario A, Ehrenfeld JM. Anesthesia information management systems: past, present, and future of anesthesia records. Mt Sinai J Med 2012; 79: 154-65.PubMedCrossRef Kadry B, Feaster WW, Macario A, Ehrenfeld JM. Anesthesia information management systems: past, present, and future of anesthesia records. Mt Sinai J Med 2012; 79: 154-65.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stabile M, Cooper L. Review article: the evolving role of information technology in perioperative patient safety. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 119-26.PubMedCrossRef Stabile M, Cooper L. Review article: the evolving role of information technology in perioperative patient safety. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 119-26.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sinclair DR. Gaining acceptance for anesthesia information management systems among anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 730-2.PubMedCrossRef Sinclair DR. Gaining acceptance for anesthesia information management systems among anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 730-2.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Reich DL, Wood RK Jr, Mattar R, et al. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate discrepancies between handwritten and computerized anesthesia records. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 612-6.PubMedCrossRef Reich DL, Wood RK Jr, Mattar R, et al. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate discrepancies between handwritten and computerized anesthesia records. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 612-6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kool NP, van Waes JA, Bijker JB, et al. Artifacts in research data obtained from an anesthesia information and management system. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 833-41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Kool NP, van Waes JA, Bijker JB, et al. Artifacts in research data obtained from an anesthesia information and management system. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 833-41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Avidan A, Weissman C. Record completeness and data concordance in an anesthesia information management system using context-sensitive mandatory data-entry fields. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81: 173-81.PubMedCrossRef Avidan A, Weissman C. Record completeness and data concordance in an anesthesia information management system using context-sensitive mandatory data-entry fields. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81: 173-81.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Avidan A, Weissman C. Context-sensitive mandatory data-entry fields for data completeness and accuracy in anesthesia information management systems. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 325-6.PubMedCrossRef Avidan A, Weissman C. Context-sensitive mandatory data-entry fields for data completeness and accuracy in anesthesia information management systems. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 325-6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heinrichs W. Automated anaesthesia record systems, observations on future trends of development. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1995; 12: 17-20.PubMedCrossRef Heinrichs W. Automated anaesthesia record systems, observations on future trends of development. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1995; 12: 17-20.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Merry AF, Webster CS, Hannam J, et al. Multimodal system designed to reduce errors in recording and administration of drugs in anaesthesia: prospective randomised clinical evaluation. BMJ 2011; 343: d5543.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Merry AF, Webster CS, Hannam J, et al. Multimodal system designed to reduce errors in recording and administration of drugs in anaesthesia: prospective randomised clinical evaluation. BMJ 2011; 343: d5543.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Edwards KE, Hagen SM, Hannam J, Kruger C, Yu R, Merry AF. A randomized comparison between records made with an anesthesia information management system and by hand, and evaluation of the Hawthorne effect. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 990-7.PubMedCrossRef Edwards KE, Hagen SM, Hannam J, Kruger C, Yu R, Merry AF. A randomized comparison between records made with an anesthesia information management system and by hand, and evaluation of the Hawthorne effect. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 990-7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, van Haselen R, Griffin M, Fisher P. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, van Haselen R, Griffin M, Fisher P. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of manual entry of drug administration data into an anesthesia information management system
Authors
Alexander Avidan, MD
Koren Dotan, MD
Charles Weissman, MD
Matan J. Cohen, MD, MPH
Phillip D. Levin, MB, BChir
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0210-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 11/2014 Go to the issue