Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Reports of Original Investigations

An experiential teaching session on the anesthesia machine check improves resident performance

Authors: Michelle Chiu, MD, Abeer A. Arab, MBBS, Robert Elliott, MD, Viren N. Naik, MD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

A preoperative machine check is imperative, yet machine faults are missed despite experience. We hypothesized that a simulation training session would improve junior residents’ ability to perform a machine check beyond the level of final year residents who received only didactic training.

Methods

In 2005, an experiential machine check training session was introduced into residency training at the postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) level. Three weeks later, the simulation residents were asked to perform a machine check and detect ten preset faults. The control group consisted of PGY-5 residents who had received a didactic anesthesia machine lecture during their residency; these control residents were asked to perform the same machine check as the simulation residents. Data were collected from 2005 to 2008 with each cohort of incoming PGY-1 residents and graduating PGY-5 residents. When the first group of PGY-1 residents became PGY-5 residents in 2009, they were invited to return for a retention test. In all tests, the number of faults detected was recorded, and the machine check was evaluated using a checklist.

Results

Thirty-seven simulation residents and 27 control residents participated in the study. Simulation residents had significantly higher checklist scores than the control residents, and they identified more machine faults (both P < 0.001). Twenty-one simulation residents repeated the study in their senior year, and they continued to achieve higher checklist scores and identify more machine faults than the control residents (both P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that an experiential training session allowed junior residents to achieve skills superior to those of senior colleagues after a five-year residency. This training was retained for two to four years as they continued to outperform their comparative controls.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Datex-Ohmeda. Preoperative Checklist and Appendix – Preoperative Tests. In: Datex-Ohmeda Aestiva Operation Manual Part 1. 2000: 4-1 – 4-4, A-1 – A-22.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Catchpole K, Bell MD, Johnson S. Safety in anaesthesia: a study of 12, 606 reported incidents from the UK National Reporting and Learning System. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 340-6.PubMedCrossRef Catchpole K, Bell MD, Johnson S. Safety in anaesthesia: a study of 12, 606 reported incidents from the UK National Reporting and Learning System. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 340-6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Webb RK, Russell WJ, Klepper I, Runciman WB. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Equipment failure: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993; 21: 673-7.PubMed Webb RK, Russell WJ, Klepper I, Runciman WB. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Equipment failure: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993; 21: 673-7.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Buffington CW, Ramanathan S, Turndorf H. Detection of anesthesia machine faults. Anesth Analg 1984; 63: 79-82.PubMedCrossRef Buffington CW, Ramanathan S, Turndorf H. Detection of anesthesia machine faults. Anesth Analg 1984; 63: 79-82.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Larson ER, Nuttall GA, Ogren BD, et al. A prospective study on anesthesia machine fault identification. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 154-6.PubMedCrossRef Larson ER, Nuttall GA, Ogren BD, et al. A prospective study on anesthesia machine fault identification. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 154-6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference March MG, Crowley JJ. An evaluation of anesthesiologists’ present checkout methods and the validity of the FDA checklist. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 724-9.PubMedCrossRef March MG, Crowley JJ. An evaluation of anesthesiologists’ present checkout methods and the validity of the FDA checklist. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 724-9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Groves J, Edwards N, Carr B. The use of a visual aid to check anaesthetic machines. Is performance improved? Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 122-5.PubMedCrossRef Groves J, Edwards N, Carr B. The use of a visual aid to check anaesthetic machines. Is performance improved? Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 122-5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Clayton DG, Barker L, Runciman WB. Evaluation of safety procedures in anaesthesia and intensive care. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993; 21: 670-2.PubMed Clayton DG, Barker L, Runciman WB. Evaluation of safety procedures in anaesthesia and intensive care. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993; 21: 670-2.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Olympio MA, Goldstein MM, Mathes DD. Instructional review improves performance of anesthesia apparatus checkout procedures. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 618-22.PubMed Olympio MA, Goldstein MM, Mathes DD. Instructional review improves performance of anesthesia apparatus checkout procedures. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 618-22.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Karpicke JD, Roediger HL 3rd. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 2008; 319: 966-8.PubMedCrossRef Karpicke JD, Roediger HL 3rd. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 2008; 319: 966-8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berge JA, Gramstad L, Grimnes S. An evaluation of a time-saving anaesthetic machine checkout procedure. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1994; 11: 493-8.PubMed Berge JA, Gramstad L, Grimnes S. An evaluation of a time-saving anaesthetic machine checkout procedure. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1994; 11: 493-8.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Merchant R, Bosenberg C, Brown K, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia revised edition 2010. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 58-87.PubMedCrossRef Merchant R, Bosenberg C, Brown K, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia revised edition 2010. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 58-87.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Issensberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27: 10-28.CrossRef Issensberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27: 10-28.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Castanelli DJ. The rise of simulation in technical skills teaching and the implications for training novices in anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 903-10.PubMed Castanelli DJ. The rise of simulation in technical skills teaching and the implications for training novices in anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 903-10.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Fisher N, Bernstein PS, Satin A, et al. Resident training for eclampsia and magnesium toxicity management: simulation or traditional lecture? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 379.e1-5. Fisher N, Bernstein PS, Satin A, et al. Resident training for eclampsia and magnesium toxicity management: simulation or traditional lecture? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 379.e1-5.
16.
go back to reference Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, MacRae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 400-9.PubMed Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, MacRae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 400-9.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Wayne DB, Siddall VJ, Butter J, et al. A longitudinal study of internal medicine residents’ retention of advanced cardiac life support skills. Acad Med 2006; 81: S9-12.PubMedCrossRef Wayne DB, Siddall VJ, Butter J, et al. A longitudinal study of internal medicine residents’ retention of advanced cardiac life support skills. Acad Med 2006; 81: S9-12.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Klopfenstein CE, Van Gessel E, Forster A. Checking the anaesthetic machine: self-reported assessment in a university hospital. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 314-9.PubMed Klopfenstein CE, Van Gessel E, Forster A. Checking the anaesthetic machine: self-reported assessment in a university hospital. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 314-9.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Waldrop WB, Murray DJ, Boulet JR, Kras JF. Management of anesthesia equipment failure: a simulation-based resident skill assessment. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 426-33.PubMedCrossRef Waldrop WB, Murray DJ, Boulet JR, Kras JF. Management of anesthesia equipment failure: a simulation-based resident skill assessment. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 426-33.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
An experiential teaching session on the anesthesia machine check improves resident performance
Authors
Michelle Chiu, MD
Abeer A. Arab, MBBS
Robert Elliott, MD
Viren N. Naik, MD
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-011-9649-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 3/2012 Go to the issue