Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2010

01-04-2010 | Reports of Original Investigations

Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle

Authors: Denis Tran, MEng, Allaudin A. Kamani, MD, Elias Al-Attas, MD, Victoria A. Lessoway, RDMS, Simon Massey, MD, Robert N. Rohling, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In conventional practice of epidural needle placement, determining the interspinous level and choosing the puncture site are based on palpation of anatomical landmarks, which can be difficult with some subjects. Thereafter, the correct passage of the needle towards the epidural space is a blind “feel as you go” method. An aim-and-insert single-operator ultrasound-guided epidural needle placement is described and demonstrated.

Method

Nineteen subjects undergoing elective Cesarean delivery consented to undergo both a pre-puncture ultrasound scan and real-time paramedian ultrasound-guidance for needle insertion. Following were the study objectives: to measure the success of a combined spinal-epidural needle insertion under real-time guidance, to compare the locations of the chosen interspinous levels as determined by both ultrasound and palpation, to measure the change in depth of the epidural space from the skin surface as pressure is applied to the ultrasound transducer, and to investigate the geometric limitations of using a fixed needle guide.

Results

One subject did not participate in the study because pre-puncture ultrasound examination showed unrecognizable bony landmarks. In 18 of 19 subjects, the epidural needle entered the epidural space successfully, as defined by a loss-of-resistance. In two subjects, entry into the epidural space was not achieved despite ultrasound guidance. Eighteen of the 19 interspinous spaces that were identified using palpation were consistent with those determined by ultrasound. The transducer pressure changed the depth of the epidural space by 2.8 mm. The measurements of the insertion lengths corresponded with the geometrical model of the needle guide, but the needle required a larger insertion angle than would be needed without the guide.

Conclusion

This small study demonstrates the feasibility of the ultrasound-guidance technique. Areas for further development are identified for both ultrasound software and physical design.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Wallace DH, Currie JM, Gilstrap LC, Santos R. Indirect sonographic guidance for epidural anesthesia in obese pregnant patients. Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 233-6.PubMed Wallace DH, Currie JM, Gilstrap LC, Santos R. Indirect sonographic guidance for epidural anesthesia in obese pregnant patients. Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 233-6.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 277-80.CrossRefPubMed Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 277-80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 1047-50.CrossRefPubMed Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 1047-50.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 766-71.CrossRefPubMed Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 766-71.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 169-75.CrossRefPubMed Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 169-75.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1188-92.CrossRefPubMed Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1188-92.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 25-31.PubMed Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 25-31.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, et al. Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss-of-resistance technique. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 200-7.CrossRefPubMed Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, et al. Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss-of-resistance technique. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 200-7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Karmakar MK, Li X, Ho AM, Kwok WH, Chui PT. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 845-54.CrossRefPubMed Karmakar MK, Li X, Ho AM, Kwok WH, Chui PT. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 845-54.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Matalon TA, Silver B. US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 1990; 174: 43-7.PubMed Matalon TA, Silver B. US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 1990; 174: 43-7.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Chestnut DH. Obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. Chestnut DH. Obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2004.
13.
go back to reference Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin EO, Motsch J. Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13: 213-7.CrossRefPubMed Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin EO, Motsch J. Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13: 213-7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lyons G, MacDonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: through the needle or in separate spaces? Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 199-201.CrossRefPubMed Lyons G, MacDonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: through the needle or in separate spaces? Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 199-201.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tanaka N, Ohkubo S, Takasaki M. Evaluation of a lockable combined spinal-epidural device for use with needle-through-needle technique (Japanese). Masui 2004; 53: 173-7.PubMed Tanaka N, Ohkubo S, Takasaki M. Evaluation of a lockable combined spinal-epidural device for use with needle-through-needle technique (Japanese). Masui 2004; 53: 173-7.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Bluvol N, Komecki A, Shaikh A, Del Rey Fernandez D, Taves DH, Fenster A. Freehand versus guided breast biopsy: comparison of accuracy, needle motion, and biopsy time in a tissue model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1720-5.CrossRefPubMed Bluvol N, Komecki A, Shaikh A, Del Rey Fernandez D, Taves DH, Fenster A. Freehand versus guided breast biopsy: comparison of accuracy, needle motion, and biopsy time in a tissue model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1720-5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle
Authors
Denis Tran, MEng
Allaudin A. Kamani, MD
Elias Al-Attas, MD
Victoria A. Lessoway, RDMS
Simon Massey, MD
Robert N. Rohling, PhD
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9252-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2010 Go to the issue