Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 4/2019

01-10-2019 | Original Article

Performance Evaluation of Automated Immunohematology Analyzer IH-500 for Blood Bank Testing

Authors: Sang Hyuk Park, Jaewook Kim, Ji-Hun Lim, Joseph Jeong, Seon-Ho Lee

Published in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The automated immunohematology analyzer IH-500 (Bio-rad, Cressier FR, Switzerland) was developed recently for blood bank tests and this study evaluated performance of IH-500. 200 blood samples for ABO/Rh typing were collected. ABO/Rh typing results measured by IH-500 was compared with conventional manual methods. Antibody screening tests were performed with 100 samples using both IH-500 and the Ortho BioVue System, and results were compared. Antibody identification tests were conducted on 5 samples using both IH-500 and the Ortho BioVue System and results were compared. Crossmatching was performed with both IH-500 and conventional manual tube method using 4 patient serum samples and 10 blood cell donors, and 40 results were compared. Isoagglutinin titer of anti-A and anti-B was determined in 10 samples using both IH-500 and the automated analyzer Ortho AutoVue Innova and concordance rates were obtained. The concordance rates of ABO/Rh typing, antibody screening test, antibody identification test, and crossmatching between comparative manual methods and the IH-500 were all 100%. In the evaluation of isoagglutinin titer, 8 (80.0%) results out of 10 samples (80%) showed results within ± 1 titer between the IH-500 and the AutoVue Innova, which indicates the concordance rates of 80.0%. IH-500 reported results with two titers lower than Ortho AutoVue Innova in two samples. The IH-500 demonstrated good concordance rates and provided reliable results compared to comparative manual methods in the blood bank testing. IH-500 would be useful as a possible replacement for conventionally performed manual methods in blood bank testing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown MR, Fritsma MG, Marques MB (2005) Transfusion safety: what has been done; what is still needed? MLO Med Lab Obs 37(11):20–24PubMed Brown MR, Fritsma MG, Marques MB (2005) Transfusion safety: what has been done; what is still needed? MLO Med Lab Obs 37(11):20–24PubMed
2.
go back to reference Davies A, Staves J, Kay J, Casbard A, Murphy MF (2006) End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses. Transfusion 46(3):352–364CrossRef Davies A, Staves J, Kay J, Casbard A, Murphy MF (2006) End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses. Transfusion 46(3):352–364CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stainsby D, Jones H, Asher D, Atterbury C, Boncinelli A, Brand L et al (2006) Serious hazards of transfusion: a decade of hemovigilance in the UK. Transfus Med Rev 20(4):273–282CrossRef Stainsby D, Jones H, Asher D, Atterbury C, Boncinelli A, Brand L et al (2006) Serious hazards of transfusion: a decade of hemovigilance in the UK. Transfus Med Rev 20(4):273–282CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Klouche M (2008) Editorial: impact of automation for testing in transfusion medicine and blood banking. Laboratoriumsmedizin 32(2):57–58CrossRef Klouche M (2008) Editorial: impact of automation for testing in transfusion medicine and blood banking. Laboratoriumsmedizin 32(2):57–58CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dada A, Beck D, Schmitz G (2007) Automation and data processing in blood banking using the ortho AutoVue® Innova System. Transfus Med Hemother 34:341–346CrossRef Dada A, Beck D, Schmitz G (2007) Automation and data processing in blood banking using the ortho AutoVue® Innova System. Transfus Med Hemother 34:341–346CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barkham TM (2004) Laboratory safety aspects of SARS at biosafety level 2. Ann Acad Med Singapore 33(2):252–256PubMed Barkham TM (2004) Laboratory safety aspects of SARS at biosafety level 2. Ann Acad Med Singapore 33(2):252–256PubMed
7.
go back to reference Butch SH (2008) Automation in the transfusion service. Immunohematology 24(3):86–92PubMed Butch SH (2008) Automation in the transfusion service. Immunohematology 24(3):86–92PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sandler SG, Langeberg A, Avery N, Mintz PD (2000) A fully automated blood typing system for hospital transfusion services. ABS2000 study group. Transfusion 40(2):201–207CrossRef Sandler SG, Langeberg A, Avery N, Mintz PD (2000) A fully automated blood typing system for hospital transfusion services. ABS2000 study group. Transfusion 40(2):201–207CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shin SY, Kwon KC, Koo SH, Park JW, Ko CS, Song JH et al (2008) Evaluation of two automated instruments for pre-transfusion testing: AutoVue Innova and Techno TwinStation. Korean J Lab Med 28(3):214–220CrossRef Shin SY, Kwon KC, Koo SH, Park JW, Ko CS, Song JH et al (2008) Evaluation of two automated instruments for pre-transfusion testing: AutoVue Innova and Techno TwinStation. Korean J Lab Med 28(3):214–220CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schoenfeld H, Pretzel KJ, von Heymann C, Neuner B, Kalus U, Kiesewetter H et al (2010) Validation of a hospital-laboratory workstation for immunohematologic methods. Transfusion 50(1):26–31CrossRef Schoenfeld H, Pretzel KJ, von Heymann C, Neuner B, Kalus U, Kiesewetter H et al (2010) Validation of a hospital-laboratory workstation for immunohematologic methods. Transfusion 50(1):26–31CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Taylor J, Hyare J, Stelfox P, Williams M, Lees R, Maley M (2011) Multi-centre evaluation of pre-transfusional routine tests using 8-column format gel cards (DG Gel®). Transfus Med 21(2):90–98CrossRef Taylor J, Hyare J, Stelfox P, Williams M, Lees R, Maley M (2011) Multi-centre evaluation of pre-transfusional routine tests using 8-column format gel cards (DG Gel®). Transfus Med 21(2):90–98CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shin KH, Kim HH, Chang CL, Lee EY (2013) Economic and workflow analysis of a blood bank automated system. Ann Lab Med 33(4):268–273CrossRef Shin KH, Kim HH, Chang CL, Lee EY (2013) Economic and workflow analysis of a blood bank automated system. Ann Lab Med 33(4):268–273CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chang C, Brown M, Davies L, Pointon L, Brown R, Barker D (2014) Evaluation of Erytra® fully automated analyser for routine use in transfusion laboratory. Transfus Med 24(1):33–38CrossRef Chang C, Brown M, Davies L, Pointon L, Brown R, Barker D (2014) Evaluation of Erytra® fully automated analyser for routine use in transfusion laboratory. Transfus Med 24(1):33–38CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cheng YW, Wilkinson JM (2015) An experience of the introduction of a blood bank automation system (Ortho AutoVue Innova) in a regional acute hospital. Transfus Apher Sci 53(1):58–63CrossRef Cheng YW, Wilkinson JM (2015) An experience of the introduction of a blood bank automation system (Ortho AutoVue Innova) in a regional acute hospital. Transfus Apher Sci 53(1):58–63CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Roback JD, Barclay S, Moulds JM, Denomme GA (2015) A multicenter study on the performance of a fully automated, walk-away high-throughput analyzer for pretransfusion testing in the US population. Transfusion 55:1522–1528CrossRef Roback JD, Barclay S, Moulds JM, Denomme GA (2015) A multicenter study on the performance of a fully automated, walk-away high-throughput analyzer for pretransfusion testing in the US population. Transfusion 55:1522–1528CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shin JW, Shin WY, Lee DL (2017) Comparison of ABO blood group typing between automated blood bank analyzer IH-500 and manual method. Korean J Blood Transfus 28(2):126–133CrossRef Shin JW, Shin WY, Lee DL (2017) Comparison of ABO blood group typing between automated blood bank analyzer IH-500 and manual method. Korean J Blood Transfus 28(2):126–133CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Park YM, Kim SY, Koo SH, Lim J, Kim JM, Lim YA (2017) Evaluation of the automated blood bank systems IH-500 and VISION max for ABO-RhD blood typing and unexpected antibody screening. Lab Med Online 7(4):170–175CrossRef Park YM, Kim SY, Koo SH, Lim J, Kim JM, Lim YA (2017) Evaluation of the automated blood bank systems IH-500 and VISION max for ABO-RhD blood typing and unexpected antibody screening. Lab Med Online 7(4):170–175CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Morelati F, Revelli N, Maffei LM, Poretti M, Santoro C, Parravicini A (1998) Evaluation of a new automated instrument for pretransfusion testing. Transfusion 38(10):959–965CrossRef Morelati F, Revelli N, Maffei LM, Poretti M, Santoro C, Parravicini A (1998) Evaluation of a new automated instrument for pretransfusion testing. Transfusion 38(10):959–965CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Performance Evaluation of Automated Immunohematology Analyzer IH-500 for Blood Bank Testing
Authors
Sang Hyuk Park
Jaewook Kim
Ji-Hun Lim
Joseph Jeong
Seon-Ho Lee
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-4502
Electronic ISSN: 0974-0449
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-019-01127-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 4/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine