Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 4/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Article

Double Dose Plateletpheresis: A Savior to Shrinking Donor Pool and Platelet Inventory Management

Authors: R. N. Makroo, Dhaval Fadadu, Soma Agrawal, Mohit Chowdhry

Published in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The double dose plateletpheresis (DDP) is considered to be a cost effective way of preparing platelets, owing to the low incidence of infectious complications and by also minimizing allogeneic donor exposure to the patients. We aimed at collecting DDP at our center and study its effect on donor hematological parameters, evaluate the product quality and the adverse donor reactions thereafter. Double Dose Platelet was collected from 160 eligible apheresis donors on Amicus cell separator (Fenwal, Inc. Three Corporate Drive Lake Zurich, IL, USA). The donor hematological parameters, product yield, adverse effects on the donors, collection efficiency (CE) and collection rate of the machine were noted. A total of 160 DDPs were collected. The total blood volume processed to achieve the yield of 6.0 × 1011 was 3673.5 ± 276.56 mL. The average yield achieved was 6.14 ± 0.26 × 1011. The average run time was 68.05 ± 6.25 min. Total ACD used was 408.33 ± 33.81 mL. We observed significant relation of pre-donation donor platelet count and platelet yield (p < 0.001). The CE was 78.09 ± 5.15%. There was a significant drop in the post DDP platelet count (p < 0.01) causing no adverse effect. Fourteen donors (8.75%) experienced mild citrate related adverse events. DDP does not lead to major adverse effects and post DDP hematological parameters are also within the acceptable range. It also helps to maintain apheresis platelet inventory, reduce donor exposure, reduce donor requirement and reduce the cost of the product.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fontana S, Kellerb P, Taleghanib MB (2011) Platelet recruitment during multiple donor plateletapheresis differs between cell separators. Transfus Med Hemother 38:195–198CrossRef Fontana S, Kellerb P, Taleghanib MB (2011) Platelet recruitment during multiple donor plateletapheresis differs between cell separators. Transfus Med Hemother 38:195–198CrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Freireich EJ, Judson G, Levin RH (1965) Separation and collection of leukocytes. Cancer Res 25:1516–1520PubMed Freireich EJ, Judson G, Levin RH (1965) Separation and collection of leukocytes. Cancer Res 25:1516–1520PubMed
4.
go back to reference Snyder EL, Elfath MD, Taylor H, Taylor H, Rugg N, Greenwalt TJ, Baril L, Whitley P, Brantigan B, Story K (2003) Collection of two units of leukoreduced RBCs from a single donation with a portable multiple-component collection system. Transfusion 43:1695–1705CrossRef Snyder EL, Elfath MD, Taylor H, Taylor H, Rugg N, Greenwalt TJ, Baril L, Whitley P, Brantigan B, Story K (2003) Collection of two units of leukoreduced RBCs from a single donation with a portable multiple-component collection system. Transfusion 43:1695–1705CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wollersheim J, Dautzenberg M, van de Griendt A, Sybesma B (2006) Donor selection criteria to maximize double platelet components (DPP) by platelet apheresis. Transfus Apher Sci 34:179–186CrossRef Wollersheim J, Dautzenberg M, van de Griendt A, Sybesma B (2006) Donor selection criteria to maximize double platelet components (DPP) by platelet apheresis. Transfus Apher Sci 34:179–186CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Das SS, Chaudhary R, Verma SK, Ojha S, Khetan D (2009) Pre- and post- donation haematological values in healthy donors undergoing plateletpheresis with five different systems. Blood Transfus 7(3):188–192PubMedPubMedCentral Das SS, Chaudhary R, Verma SK, Ojha S, Khetan D (2009) Pre- and post- donation haematological values in healthy donors undergoing plateletpheresis with five different systems. Blood Transfus 7(3):188–192PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
go back to reference Picker SM, Radojska SM, Gathof BS (2006) Evaluation of concurrent collection of in-line filtered platelets and packed red blood cells by multicomponent apheresis with three last-generation apparatuses. Vox Sang 91:47–55CrossRef Picker SM, Radojska SM, Gathof BS (2006) Evaluation of concurrent collection of in-line filtered platelets and packed red blood cells by multicomponent apheresis with three last-generation apparatuses. Vox Sang 91:47–55CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Julmy F, Ammann RA, Mansouri Taleghani B, Fontana S, Hirt A, Leibundgut K (2008) Effects of high-yield thrombocytapheresis on the quality of platelet components. Transfusion 48:442–450CrossRef Julmy F, Ammann RA, Mansouri Taleghani B, Fontana S, Hirt A, Leibundgut K (2008) Effects of high-yield thrombocytapheresis on the quality of platelet components. Transfusion 48:442–450CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Richa E, Krueger P, Burgstaler EA, Bryant SC, Winters JL (2008) The effect of double- and triple-apheresis platelet component donation on apheresis donor platelet and white blood cell counts. Transfusion 48:1325–1332CrossRef Richa E, Krueger P, Burgstaler EA, Bryant SC, Winters JL (2008) The effect of double- and triple-apheresis platelet component donation on apheresis donor platelet and white blood cell counts. Transfusion 48:1325–1332CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gurak S, Arslan O (2007) Efficacy of Fenwal Amicus blood cell separator in double dose platelet collection. Transfus Apher Sci 36:69–72CrossRef Gurak S, Arslan O (2007) Efficacy of Fenwal Amicus blood cell separator in double dose platelet collection. Transfus Apher Sci 36:69–72CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Food and Drug Administration (2007) Guidance for industry and FDA review staff: collection of platelets by automated methods. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC, pp 1–3 Food and Drug Administration (2007) Guidance for industry and FDA review staff: collection of platelets by automated methods. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC, pp 1–3
13.
go back to reference Malik V (2001) Drugs & cosmetics act, 13th edn. Eastern Book Company, Lucknow Malik V (2001) Drugs & cosmetics act, 13th edn. Eastern Book Company, Lucknow
14.
go back to reference Das SS, Chaudhary R, Verma SK, Ojha S, Khetan D (2009) Pre and post donation hematological values in healthy donors undergoing plateletpheresis with five different systems. Blood Transfus 7:188–192PubMedPubMedCentral Das SS, Chaudhary R, Verma SK, Ojha S, Khetan D (2009) Pre and post donation hematological values in healthy donors undergoing plateletpheresis with five different systems. Blood Transfus 7:188–192PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Price TH (2003) Provision of single-donor platelet transfusions: patient and producer perspectives. In: McLeod BC, Price TH, Weinstein R (eds) Apheresis: principles and practice, 2nd edn. AABB Press, Bethesda, pp 185–197 Price TH (2003) Provision of single-donor platelet transfusions: patient and producer perspectives. In: McLeod BC, Price TH, Weinstein R (eds) Apheresis: principles and practice, 2nd edn. AABB Press, Bethesda, pp 185–197
16.
go back to reference Vassallo R, Murphy S (2003) Platelet function, kinetics and metabolism: impact on quality assessment, storage and clinical use. In: McLeod BC, Price TH, Weinstein R (eds) Apheresis: principles and practice, 2nd edn. AABB Press, Bethesda, pp 161–183 Vassallo R, Murphy S (2003) Platelet function, kinetics and metabolism: impact on quality assessment, storage and clinical use. In: McLeod BC, Price TH, Weinstein R (eds) Apheresis: principles and practice, 2nd edn. AABB Press, Bethesda, pp 161–183
17.
go back to reference Ness P, Braine H, King K, Barrasso C, Kickler T, Fuller A et al (2001) Single donor platelets reduce the risk of septic platelet transfusion reactions. Transfusion 41:857–861CrossRef Ness P, Braine H, King K, Barrasso C, Kickler T, Fuller A et al (2001) Single donor platelets reduce the risk of septic platelet transfusion reactions. Transfusion 41:857–861CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ness PM, Campbell-Lee SA (2001) Single donor versus pooled random donor platelet concentrates. Curr Opin Hematol 8:392–396CrossRef Ness PM, Campbell-Lee SA (2001) Single donor versus pooled random donor platelet concentrates. Curr Opin Hematol 8:392–396CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Singh RP, Marwaha N, Malhotra P, Dash S (2009) Quality assessment of platelet concentrates prepared by platelet rich plasma-platelet concentrate, buffy coat poor-platelet concentrate (BC-PC) and apheresis-PC methods. Asian J Transfus Sci 3(2):86–94CrossRef Singh RP, Marwaha N, Malhotra P, Dash S (2009) Quality assessment of platelet concentrates prepared by platelet rich plasma-platelet concentrate, buffy coat poor-platelet concentrate (BC-PC) and apheresis-PC methods. Asian J Transfus Sci 3(2):86–94CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stainsby D, Jones H, Asher D, Atterbury C, Boncinelli A, Brant L, Chapman CE, Davison K, Gerrard R, Gray A, Knowles S, Love EM, Milkins C, McClelland DB, Norfolk DR, Soldan K, Taylor C, Revill J, Williamson LM, Cohen H (2006) Serious hazards of transfusion: a decade of hemovigilance in the UK. Transfus Med Rev 20:273–282CrossRef Stainsby D, Jones H, Asher D, Atterbury C, Boncinelli A, Brant L, Chapman CE, Davison K, Gerrard R, Gray A, Knowles S, Love EM, Milkins C, McClelland DB, Norfolk DR, Soldan K, Taylor C, Revill J, Williamson LM, Cohen H (2006) Serious hazards of transfusion: a decade of hemovigilance in the UK. Transfus Med Rev 20:273–282CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kleinmann S, Grossman B, Kopko P (2010) A national survey of transfusion-related acute lung injury risk reduction policies for platelets and plasma in the United States. Transfusion 50:1312–1321CrossRef Kleinmann S, Grossman B, Kopko P (2010) A national survey of transfusion-related acute lung injury risk reduction policies for platelets and plasma in the United States. Transfusion 50:1312–1321CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Glicher RO, Smith JW (eds) (2009) Apheresis: principles and technologies of hemapheresis. In: Simon LT, Snyder EL, Solheim BG, Stowell CP, Strauss RG, Petrides M (eds) Rossi‘s principle of transfusion medicine, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp 617–628 Glicher RO, Smith JW (eds) (2009) Apheresis: principles and technologies of hemapheresis. In: Simon LT, Snyder EL, Solheim BG, Stowell CP, Strauss RG, Petrides M (eds) Rossi‘s principle of transfusion medicine, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp 617–628
23.
go back to reference Chaudhary R, Das SS, Khetan D, Ojha S, Verma S (2010) Donor safety issue in high-dose platelet collection using the latest apheresis system. Transfus Altern Transfus Med 11:1–7CrossRef Chaudhary R, Das SS, Khetan D, Ojha S, Verma S (2010) Donor safety issue in high-dose platelet collection using the latest apheresis system. Transfus Altern Transfus Med 11:1–7CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jaipian J, Chuansumrit A, Chongkolwatana V, Kunakorn M, Kitpoka P (2013) Collection efficacies of double dose platelet by blood cell separators. J Hematol Transfus Med 23:121–128CrossRef Jaipian J, Chuansumrit A, Chongkolwatana V, Kunakorn M, Kitpoka P (2013) Collection efficacies of double dose platelet by blood cell separators. J Hematol Transfus Med 23:121–128CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fontana S, Mordasini L, Keller P, Taleghani BM (2006) Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators. Transfusion 46:2004–2010CrossRef Fontana S, Mordasini L, Keller P, Taleghani BM (2006) Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators. Transfusion 46:2004–2010CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Keklik M, Eser B, Kaynar L, Solmaz M, Ozturk A, Yay M, Birekul A, Oztekin M, Sivgin S, Cetin M, Unal A (2014) Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators. Transfus Apher Sci 51:193–196CrossRef Keklik M, Eser B, Kaynar L, Solmaz M, Ozturk A, Yay M, Birekul A, Oztekin M, Sivgin S, Cetin M, Unal A (2014) Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators. Transfus Apher Sci 51:193–196CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Flesch BK, Adamzik I, Steppat D, Miller J, Carstensen L, Schapke M, Davey J (2010) Paired crossover study of tw o plateletpheresis systems concerning platelet component quality and donor comfort. Transfusion 50:894–901CrossRef Flesch BK, Adamzik I, Steppat D, Miller J, Carstensen L, Schapke M, Davey J (2010) Paired crossover study of tw o plateletpheresis systems concerning platelet component quality and donor comfort. Transfusion 50:894–901CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Double Dose Plateletpheresis: A Savior to Shrinking Donor Pool and Platelet Inventory Management
Authors
R. N. Makroo
Dhaval Fadadu
Soma Agrawal
Mohit Chowdhry
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0971-4502
Electronic ISSN: 0974-0449
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-018-0920-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 4/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine