Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 4/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Single Dose Preemptive Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization for ASCT After Lenalidomide Based Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Impact in Resource Limited Setting

Authors: Rajiv Kumar, Rajan Kapoor, Bhushan Asthana, Jasjit Singh, Tarun Verma, Rajesh Chilaka, N. K. Singh, Ajay Sharma, S. Das, Velu Nair

Published in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cytokines for autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma is adversely affected by initial induction therapy consisting of either Lenalidomide or cytotoxic drugs, with failure rates of up to 45%. The use of Plerixafor with G-CSF for PBSC mobilisation significantly improves the chances of a successful mobilization. Plerixafor is a costly therapy and increases the overall costs of ASCT which can affect the number of patients being taken up for ASCT in resource limited settings. We prospectively studied the impact of single dose preemptive Plerixafor for PBSC mobilization in patients with prior Lenalidomide exposure. 26 patients who had received Lenalidomide based induction protocol underwent PBSC mobilisation during the study period with G-CSF 10 μg/kg/day SC for 4 days and single dose preemptive Plerixafor 240 μg/kg SC stat 11 h before the scheduled PB stem cell harvest on D5, based on a D4 PB CD34+ counts of <20/μL. A median of 07 cycles of Lenalidomide based combination therapy was used for induction therapy prior to ASCT. 84% patients underwent successful mobilization with one sitting of stem cell harvest post a single dose of Inj Plerixafor. 7.6% patients failed to mobilise the predefined minimum cell dose of CD34 and could not be taken up for ASCT. The median CD34% of the harvest bag sample was 0.33% (0.1–0.97%). Injection site erythema (34%), paresthesia’s (34%) and nausea (30%) were the commonest adverse events reported post Inj Plerixafor. We did a real-world cost analysis for a resource limited setting for PBSC mobilization and found significant cost savings for the preemptive Plerixafor group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Micallef INM, Ho AD et al (2011) Plerixafor (Mozobil) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide. Bone Marrow Transplant 46:350–355CrossRefPubMed Micallef INM, Ho AD et al (2011) Plerixafor (Mozobil) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide. Bone Marrow Transplant 46:350–355CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Malard F, Kreoger N et al (2012) Plerixafor for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients previously treated with fludarabine or lenalidomide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18:309–329CrossRef Malard F, Kreoger N et al (2012) Plerixafor for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients previously treated with fludarabine or lenalidomide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18:309–329CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Popat U, Saliba R et al (2009) Impairment of filgastrim-induced stem cell mobilization after prior lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15(6):718–723CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Popat U, Saliba R et al (2009) Impairment of filgastrim-induced stem cell mobilization after prior lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15(6):718–723CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Sánchez-Ortega I, Querol S et al (2015) Plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma: effectiveness in cases with very low circulating CD34+ cell levels and preemptive intervention vs remobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 50:34–39CrossRefPubMed Sánchez-Ortega I, Querol S et al (2015) Plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma: effectiveness in cases with very low circulating CD34+ cell levels and preemptive intervention vs remobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 50:34–39CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Giralt S, Costa L et al (2014) Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: consensus guidelines and recommendations. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 20:295–308CrossRefPubMed Giralt S, Costa L et al (2014) Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: consensus guidelines and recommendations. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 20:295–308CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cheng J, Schmitt M et al (2015) Plerixafor is effective given either preemptively or as a rescue strategy in poor stem cell mobilizing patients with multiple myeloma. Transfusion 55:275–283CrossRefPubMed Cheng J, Schmitt M et al (2015) Plerixafor is effective given either preemptively or as a rescue strategy in poor stem cell mobilizing patients with multiple myeloma. Transfusion 55:275–283CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mohty M, Duarte RF, Croockewit S, Hübel K, Kvalheim G, Russell N (2011) The role of plerixafor in optimizing peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 25:1–6CrossRefPubMed Mohty M, Duarte RF, Croockewit S, Hübel K, Kvalheim G, Russell N (2011) The role of plerixafor in optimizing peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 25:1–6CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jantunen E, Lemoni RM (2012) Preemptive use of plerixafor in difficult-to-mobilizepatients: an emerging concept. Transfusion 52:906–914CrossRefPubMed Jantunen E, Lemoni RM (2012) Preemptive use of plerixafor in difficult-to-mobilizepatients: an emerging concept. Transfusion 52:906–914CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nademanee AP, DiPersio JF, Maziarz RT, Stadtmauer EA, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ et al (2012) Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34+ cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18:1564–1572CrossRefPubMed Nademanee AP, DiPersio JF, Maziarz RT, Stadtmauer EA, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ et al (2012) Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34+ cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18:1564–1572CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lefrère F, Mauge L, Réa D, Ribell JA, Dal Cortivo L, Brignier AC et al (2013) A specific time course for mobilization of peripheral blood CD34+ cells after plerixafor injection in very poor mobilizers: impact on the timing of the apheresis procedure. Transfusion 53:564–569CrossRefPubMed Lefrère F, Mauge L, Réa D, Ribell JA, Dal Cortivo L, Brignier AC et al (2013) A specific time course for mobilization of peripheral blood CD34+ cells after plerixafor injection in very poor mobilizers: impact on the timing of the apheresis procedure. Transfusion 53:564–569CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pusic I, Jiang SY, Landua S et al (2008) Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 14:1045–1056CrossRefPubMed Pusic I, Jiang SY, Landua S et al (2008) Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 14:1045–1056CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Alegre A, Tomas JF, Martinez-Chamorro C et al (1997) Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone. Bone Marrow Transplant 20:211–217CrossRefPubMed Alegre A, Tomas JF, Martinez-Chamorro C et al (1997) Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone. Bone Marrow Transplant 20:211–217CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Desikan KR, Barlogie B, Jagannath S et al (1998) Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 16:1547–1553CrossRefPubMed Desikan KR, Barlogie B, Jagannath S et al (1998) Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 16:1547–1553CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bensinger W, Appelbaum F, Rowley S et al (1995) Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells. J Clin Oncol 13:2547–2555CrossRefPubMed Bensinger W, Appelbaum F, Rowley S et al (1995) Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells. J Clin Oncol 13:2547–2555CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Narayanasami U, Kanteti R, Morelli J et al (2001) Randomized trial of filgrastim versus chemotherapy and filgrastim mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for rescue in autologous transplantation. Blood 98:2059–2064CrossRefPubMed Narayanasami U, Kanteti R, Morelli J et al (2001) Randomized trial of filgrastim versus chemotherapy and filgrastim mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for rescue in autologous transplantation. Blood 98:2059–2064CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dazzi C, Cariello A, Rosti G et al (2000) Is there any difference in PBPC mobilization between cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma? Leuk Lymphoma 39:301–310CrossRefPubMed Dazzi C, Cariello A, Rosti G et al (2000) Is there any difference in PBPC mobilization between cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma? Leuk Lymphoma 39:301–310CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Glaspy JA (1999) Economic considerations in the use of peripheral blood progenitor cells to support high-dose chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 23(Suppl 2):S21–S27CrossRefPubMed Glaspy JA (1999) Economic considerations in the use of peripheral blood progenitor cells to support high-dose chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 23(Suppl 2):S21–S27CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kanteti R, Miller K, McCann J et al (1999) Randomized trial of peripheral blood progenitor cell vs bone marrow as hematopoietic support for high-dose chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease: a clinical and molecular analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 24:473–481CrossRefPubMed Kanteti R, Miller K, McCann J et al (1999) Randomized trial of peripheral blood progenitor cell vs bone marrow as hematopoietic support for high-dose chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease: a clinical and molecular analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 24:473–481CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Pusic I, Jiang SY, Landua S et al (2008) Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 14:1045–1056CrossRefPubMed Pusic I, Jiang SY, Landua S et al (2008) Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 14:1045–1056CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Alegre A, Tomas JF, Martinez-Chamorro C et al (1997) Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone. Bone Marrow Transplant 20:211–217CrossRefPubMed Alegre A, Tomas JF, Martinez-Chamorro C et al (1997) Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone. Bone Marrow Transplant 20:211–217CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Chao NJ, Grima DT, Carrum G et al (2011) Chemo-mobilization provides superior mobilization and collection in autologous stem cell transplants but with less predictability and at a higher cost. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. Blood 118:4048CrossRef Chao NJ, Grima DT, Carrum G et al (2011) Chemo-mobilization provides superior mobilization and collection in autologous stem cell transplants but with less predictability and at a higher cost. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. Blood 118:4048CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Desikan KR, Barlogie B, Jagannath S et al (1998) Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 16:1547–1553CrossRefPubMed Desikan KR, Barlogie B, Jagannath S et al (1998) Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 16:1547–1553CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Desikan KR, Tricot G, Munshi NC et al (2001) Preceding chemotherapy, tumour load and age influence engraftment in multiple myeloma patients mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone. Br J Haematol 112:242–247CrossRefPubMed Desikan KR, Tricot G, Munshi NC et al (2001) Preceding chemotherapy, tumour load and age influence engraftment in multiple myeloma patients mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone. Br J Haematol 112:242–247CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dingli D, Nowakowski GS, Dispenzieri A et al (2006) Cyclophosphamide mobilization does not improve outcome in patients receiving stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 6:384–388CrossRefPubMed Dingli D, Nowakowski GS, Dispenzieri A et al (2006) Cyclophosphamide mobilization does not improve outcome in patients receiving stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 6:384–388CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Shaughnessy Paul, Chao Nelson et al (2013) Pharmacoeconomics of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: an overview of current evidence and gaps in the literature. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 19:1301–1309CrossRefPubMed Shaughnessy Paul, Chao Nelson et al (2013) Pharmacoeconomics of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: an overview of current evidence and gaps in the literature. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 19:1301–1309CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
go back to reference Mazumder A, Kaufman J, Niesvizky R et al (2008) Effect of lenalidomide therapy on mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. Leukemia 22:1280–1281 (author reply 1281-1282) CrossRefPubMed Mazumder A, Kaufman J, Niesvizky R et al (2008) Effect of lenalidomide therapy on mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. Leukemia 22:1280–1281 (author reply 1281-1282) CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Micallef IN, Apostolidis J, Rohatiner AZ et al (2000) Factors which predict unsuccessful mobilisation of peripheral blood progenitor cells following G-CSF alone in patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematol J 1:367–373CrossRefPubMed Micallef IN, Apostolidis J, Rohatiner AZ et al (2000) Factors which predict unsuccessful mobilisation of peripheral blood progenitor cells following G-CSF alone in patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematol J 1:367–373CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Stiff PJ (1999) Management strategies for the hard-to-mobilize patient. Bone Marrow Transplant 23(Suppl 2):S29–S33CrossRefPubMed Stiff PJ (1999) Management strategies for the hard-to-mobilize patient. Bone Marrow Transplant 23(Suppl 2):S29–S33CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hosing C, Saliba RM, Ahlawat S et al (2009) Poor hematopoietic stem cell mobilizers: a single-institution study of incidence and risk factors in patients with recurrent or relapsed lymphoma. Am J Hematol 84:335–337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hosing C, Saliba RM, Ahlawat S et al (2009) Poor hematopoietic stem cell mobilizers: a single-institution study of incidence and risk factors in patients with recurrent or relapsed lymphoma. Am J Hematol 84:335–337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Wuchter P, Ran D, Bruckner T et al (2010) Poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cellsddefinitions, incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:490–499CrossRefPubMed Wuchter P, Ran D, Bruckner T et al (2010) Poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cellsddefinitions, incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:490–499CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Haas R, Mohle R, Fruhauf S et al (1994) Patient characteristics associated with successful mobilizing and autografting of peripheral blood progenitor cells in malignant lymphoma. Blood 83:3787–3794PubMed Haas R, Mohle R, Fruhauf S et al (1994) Patient characteristics associated with successful mobilizing and autografting of peripheral blood progenitor cells in malignant lymphoma. Blood 83:3787–3794PubMed
33.
go back to reference Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ et al (2007) Impact of lenalidomide therapy on stem cell mobilization and engraftment post-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Leukemia 21:2035–2042CrossRefPubMed Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ et al (2007) Impact of lenalidomide therapy on stem cell mobilization and engraftment post-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Leukemia 21:2035–2042CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Cavallo F, Bringhen S, Milone G et al (2011) Stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after Lenalidomide induction therapy. Leukemia 25:1627–1631CrossRefPubMed Cavallo F, Bringhen S, Milone G et al (2011) Stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after Lenalidomide induction therapy. Leukemia 25:1627–1631CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Tournilhac O, Cazin B, Leprètre S et al (2004) Impact of frontline fludarabine and cyclophosphamide combined treatment on peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 103:363–365CrossRefPubMed Tournilhac O, Cazin B, Leprètre S et al (2004) Impact of frontline fludarabine and cyclophosphamide combined treatment on peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 103:363–365CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Waterman J, Rybicki L, Bolwell B et al (2011) Fludarabine as a risk factor for poor stem cell harvest, treatment-related MDS and AML in follicular lymphoma patients after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:488–493CrossRefPubMed Waterman J, Rybicki L, Bolwell B et al (2011) Fludarabine as a risk factor for poor stem cell harvest, treatment-related MDS and AML in follicular lymphoma patients after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:488–493CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Jantunen E, Kuittinen T, Nousiainen T (2003) Is chemotherapy scoring useful to predict progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma? Bone Marrow Transplant 32:569–573CrossRefPubMed Jantunen E, Kuittinen T, Nousiainen T (2003) Is chemotherapy scoring useful to predict progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma? Bone Marrow Transplant 32:569–573CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Costa LJ, Nista EJ, Buadi FK, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Kramer CP et al (2014) Prediction of poor mobilization of autologous CD34+ cells with growth factor in multiple myeloma patients:implications for risk-stratification. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 20:222–228CrossRefPubMed Costa LJ, Nista EJ, Buadi FK, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Kramer CP et al (2014) Prediction of poor mobilization of autologous CD34+ cells with growth factor in multiple myeloma patients:implications for risk-stratification. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 20:222–228CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference DiPersio JF, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ et al (2009) Phase III prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4767–4773CrossRefPubMed DiPersio JF, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ et al (2009) Phase III prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4767–4773CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Russell N, Douglas K et al (2013) Plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for first-line steady-state autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: results of the prospective PREDICT trial. Hematologica 98(2):172–178CrossRef Russell N, Douglas K et al (2013) Plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for first-line steady-state autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: results of the prospective PREDICT trial. Hematologica 98(2):172–178CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Paripati H, Stewart AK, Cabou S et al (2008) Compromised stem cell mobilization following induction therapy with lenalidomide in myeloma. Leukemia 22:1282–1284CrossRefPubMed Paripati H, Stewart AK, Cabou S et al (2008) Compromised stem cell mobilization following induction therapy with lenalidomide in myeloma. Leukemia 22:1282–1284CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Basak GW, Jaksic O, Koristek Z et al (2011) Identification of prognostic factors for plerixafor-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Am J Hematol 86:550–553CrossRefPubMed Basak GW, Jaksic O, Koristek Z et al (2011) Identification of prognostic factors for plerixafor-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Am J Hematol 86:550–553CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Popat R, Oakervee HE, Hallam S et al (2008) Bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD) front-line treatment of multiple myeloma: updated results after long-term follow-up. Br J Haematol 141:512–516CrossRefPubMed Popat R, Oakervee HE, Hallam S et al (2008) Bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD) front-line treatment of multiple myeloma: updated results after long-term follow-up. Br J Haematol 141:512–516CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Lu S, Wang J, Xu X et al (2009) Bortezomib in combination with epirubicin, dexamethasone and thalidomide is a highly effective regimen in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a single-center experience. Int J Hematol 89:34–38CrossRefPubMed Lu S, Wang J, Xu X et al (2009) Bortezomib in combination with epirubicin, dexamethasone and thalidomide is a highly effective regimen in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a single-center experience. Int J Hematol 89:34–38CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Kaufman JL, Nooka A, Vrana M et al (2010) Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. Cancer 116:3143–3151CrossRefPubMed Kaufman JL, Nooka A, Vrana M et al (2010) Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. Cancer 116:3143–3151CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Jakubowiak AJ, Kendall T, Al-Zoubi A et al (2009) Phase II trial of combination therapy with bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol 27:5015–5022CrossRefPubMed Jakubowiak AJ, Kendall T, Al-Zoubi A et al (2009) Phase II trial of combination therapy with bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol 27:5015–5022CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Corso A, Barbarano L, Mangiacavalli S et al (2010) Bortezomib plus dexamethasone can improve stem cell collection and overcome the need for additional chemotherapy before autologous transplant in patients with myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 51:236–242CrossRefPubMed Corso A, Barbarano L, Mangiacavalli S et al (2010) Bortezomib plus dexamethasone can improve stem cell collection and overcome the need for additional chemotherapy before autologous transplant in patients with myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 51:236–242CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Moreau P, Hulin C, Marit G et al (2010) Stem cell collection in patients with de novo multiple myeloma treated with the combination of bortezomib and dexamethasone before autologous stem cell transplantation according to IFM 2005-01 trial. Leukemia 24:1233–1235CrossRefPubMed Moreau P, Hulin C, Marit G et al (2010) Stem cell collection in patients with de novo multiple myeloma treated with the combination of bortezomib and dexamethasone before autologous stem cell transplantation according to IFM 2005-01 trial. Leukemia 24:1233–1235CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Clark RE, Bell J et al (2014) Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilization, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients. Blood Cancer J 4(e255):1–6 Clark RE, Bell J et al (2014) Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilization, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients. Blood Cancer J 4(e255):1–6
50.
go back to reference Abhyankar S, Dejarnette S, Aljitawi O et al (2011) A risk-based approach to optimize autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection with the use of plerixafor. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:483–487CrossRefPubMed Abhyankar S, Dejarnette S, Aljitawi O et al (2011) A risk-based approach to optimize autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection with the use of plerixafor. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:483–487CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference LaPorte J, Solomon SR, Bashey A et al (2011) An effective hematopoietic stem cell mobilization algorithm for adding plerixafor to G-CSF for multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplantation. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. Blood 118:4389 LaPorte J, Solomon SR, Bashey A et al (2011) An effective hematopoietic stem cell mobilization algorithm for adding plerixafor to G-CSF for multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplantation. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. Blood 118:4389
52.
go back to reference Micallef IN, Inwards DJ, Dispenzieri A et al (2010) A risk-adapted approach utilizing plerixafor in autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16(Suppl 2):S197–S198CrossRef Micallef IN, Inwards DJ, Dispenzieri A et al (2010) A risk-adapted approach utilizing plerixafor in autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16(Suppl 2):S197–S198CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Costa LJ, Alexander ET, Hogan KR et al (2011) Development and validation of a decision-making algorithm to guide the use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 46:64–69CrossRefPubMed Costa LJ, Alexander ET, Hogan KR et al (2011) Development and validation of a decision-making algorithm to guide the use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 46:64–69CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Li J, Hamilton E, Vaughn L et al (2011) Effectiveness and cost analysis of “justin- time” salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics. Transfusion 51:2175–2182CrossRefPubMed Li J, Hamilton E, Vaughn L et al (2011) Effectiveness and cost analysis of “justin- time” salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics. Transfusion 51:2175–2182CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Chen AI, Bains T, Murray S et al (2012) Clinical experience with a simple algorithm for plerixafor utilization in autologous stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:1526–1529CrossRefPubMed Chen AI, Bains T, Murray S et al (2012) Clinical experience with a simple algorithm for plerixafor utilization in autologous stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:1526–1529CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Nademanee AP, DiPersio JF et al (2012) Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34 hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34 cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18:1564–1572CrossRefPubMed Nademanee AP, DiPersio JF et al (2012) Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34 hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34 cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18:1564–1572CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference DiPersio JF, Stadtmauer EA et al (2009) Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 113:5720–5726PubMed DiPersio JF, Stadtmauer EA et al (2009) Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 113:5720–5726PubMed
58.
go back to reference Meehan KR, Areman EM, Ericson SG, Matias C, Seifeldin R, Schulman K (2000) Mobilization, collection, and processing of autologous peripheral blood stem cells: development of a clinical process with associated costs. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 9:767–771CrossRefPubMed Meehan KR, Areman EM, Ericson SG, Matias C, Seifeldin R, Schulman K (2000) Mobilization, collection, and processing of autologous peripheral blood stem cells: development of a clinical process with associated costs. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 9:767–771CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Vishnu P, Roy V, Paulsen A, Zubair AC (2012) Efficacy and cost-benefit analysis of risk-adaptive use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization. Transfusion 52:55–62CrossRefPubMed Vishnu P, Roy V, Paulsen A, Zubair AC (2012) Efficacy and cost-benefit analysis of risk-adaptive use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization. Transfusion 52:55–62CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Single Dose Preemptive Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization for ASCT After Lenalidomide Based Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Impact in Resource Limited Setting
Authors
Rajiv Kumar
Rajan Kapoor
Bhushan Asthana
Jasjit Singh
Tarun Verma
Rajesh Chilaka
N. K. Singh
Ajay Sharma
S. Das
Velu Nair
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0971-4502
Electronic ISSN: 0974-0449
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-017-0798-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 4/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine