Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Article

Objective assessment of reconstructed breast hardness using a durometer

Authors: Hiroki Mori, Noriko Uemura, Haruka Koga, Mutsumi Okazaki

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Whether a durometer was suitable for objectively measuring reconstructed breast hardness was evaluated.

Methods

Subjects were 81 women who underwent expander-implant reconstructions following breast cancer ablation. Capsular contracture was evaluated with Baker grading. Capsular thickness was measured with T1-weighted MRI at the upper areola area. The durometer was placed on the upper areola. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to compare variables.

Results

On Baker grading, 17 breasts were Baker grade I, 52 breasts were Baker grade II, 11 breasts were Baker grade III, and 1 breast was Baker grade IV. Mean capsular thickness on MRI was 1.1 (SD 0.4) mm with Baker grade I, 1.2 (SD 0.3) mm with Baker grade II, 1.4 (SD 0.4) mm with Baker grade III, and 1.9 mm with Baker grade IV. Mean durometer value was 0 with Baker grade I, 0.2 (SD 0.5) with Baker grade II, 2.0 (SD 1.7), with Baker grade III, and 8 with Baker grade IV. Baker grade IV was excluded from analysis because there was only one case. When Baker grade III was defined as positive for hardness, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that durometer value was associated with Baker grade III (p = 0.0005), but capsular thickness was not. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the durometer value for Baker grade III, the optimal cutoff value was 0.5 (sensitivity 0.92, 1-specificity 0.17, area under the curve 0.92).

Conclusions

The durometer offers an objective index of hardness that might replace the subjective Baker grading. Further studies are needed to confirm the utility of this index.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1224–36.CrossRefPubMed Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1224–36.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Berry MG, Cucchiara V, Davies DM. Breast augmentation: Part II–Adverse capsular contracture. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:2098–107.CrossRefPubMed Berry MG, Cucchiara V, Davies DM. Breast augmentation: Part II–Adverse capsular contracture. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:2098–107.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Baker JL. Augmentation mammaplasty. In: Grabb WC, editor. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1979. p. 719. Baker JL. Augmentation mammaplasty. In: Grabb WC, editor. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1979. p. 719.
4.
go back to reference Zahavi A, Sklair ML, Ad-El DD. Capsular contracture of the breast: working towards a better classification using clinical and radiologic assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:248–51.CrossRefPubMed Zahavi A, Sklair ML, Ad-El DD. Capsular contracture of the breast: working towards a better classification using clinical and radiologic assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:248–51.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fagrell D, Berggren A, Tarpila E. Capsular contracture around saline-filled fine textured and smooth mammary implants: a prospective 7.5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:2108–12.CrossRefPubMed Fagrell D, Berggren A, Tarpila E. Capsular contracture around saline-filled fine textured and smooth mammary implants: a prospective 7.5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:2108–12.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Akita S, Akino K, Yakabe A, et al. Combined surgical excision and radiation therapy for keloid treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18:1164–9.CrossRefPubMed Akita S, Akino K, Yakabe A, et al. Combined surgical excision and radiation therapy for keloid treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18:1164–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Greenwald D, Moloye O, Ondrovic L, et al. Mechanical and sensory testing of overfilled breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:29–34.CrossRefPubMed Greenwald D, Moloye O, Ondrovic L, et al. Mechanical and sensory testing of overfilled breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:29–34.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Roberts KL. Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure tissue hardness in breasts. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1998;16:19–23.PubMed Roberts KL. Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure tissue hardness in breasts. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1998;16:19–23.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hakelius L, Ohlsen L. Tendency to capsular contracture around smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants: a 5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1566–9.CrossRefPubMed Hakelius L, Ohlsen L. Tendency to capsular contracture around smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants: a 5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1566–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Klinger M, Caviggioli F, Klinger FM, et al. Autologous fat graft in scar treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:1610–5.CrossRefPubMed Klinger M, Caviggioli F, Klinger FM, et al. Autologous fat graft in scar treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:1610–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Moon KW, Song R, Kim JH, et al. The correlation between durometer score and modified Rodnan skin score in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:2465–70.CrossRefPubMed Moon KW, Song R, Kim JH, et al. The correlation between durometer score and modified Rodnan skin score in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:2465–70.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Choh CT, Wall ML, Brown MD, et al. Use of durometry in assessment of venous disease. Phlebology. 2010;25:94–9.CrossRefPubMed Choh CT, Wall ML, Brown MD, et al. Use of durometry in assessment of venous disease. Phlebology. 2010;25:94–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Niitsu M, Michizaki A, Endo A, et al. Muscle hardness measurement by using ultrasound elastography: a feasibility study. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:99–105.CrossRefPubMed Niitsu M, Michizaki A, Endo A, et al. Muscle hardness measurement by using ultrasound elastography: a feasibility study. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:99–105.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rennekampff HO, Exner K, Lemperle G, Nemsmann B. Reduction of capsular formation around silicone breast implants by d-penicillamine in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992;26:253–5.CrossRefPubMed Rennekampff HO, Exner K, Lemperle G, Nemsmann B. Reduction of capsular formation around silicone breast implants by d-penicillamine in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992;26:253–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, et al. The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on two-stage implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of long-term surgical outcomes, aesthetic results, and satisfaction over 13 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:588–95.CrossRefPubMed Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, et al. The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on two-stage implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of long-term surgical outcomes, aesthetic results, and satisfaction over 13 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:588–95.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zeplin PH, Corduff N. Influence of patient age on capsular contracture after aesthetic breast augmentation. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015;23:67–9. Zeplin PH, Corduff N. Influence of patient age on capsular contracture after aesthetic breast augmentation. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015;23:67–9.
18.
go back to reference McGuire P, Reisman NR, Murphy DK. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture, malposition, and late seroma in subjects receiving Natrelle 410 form-stable silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:1–9.CrossRefPubMed McGuire P, Reisman NR, Murphy DK. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture, malposition, and late seroma in subjects receiving Natrelle 410 form-stable silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:1–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:145–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:145–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Objective assessment of reconstructed breast hardness using a durometer
Authors
Hiroki Mori
Noriko Uemura
Haruka Koga
Mutsumi Okazaki
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-017-0791-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Breast Cancer 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine