Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 2/2008

01-04-2008 | Review Article

Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer in augmented women

Author: Takayoshi Uematsu

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Cosmetic breast enlargement surgery has become common in Japan. There are some reports suggesting that implants can interfere with mammography (MMG) and may lead to delayed breast cancer diagnosis, even when implant-displaced MMG (Eklund technique) is performed. Screening MMG was recommended in a notification issued by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 1999, and MMG is just coming into widespread use in Japanese breast cancer screening. Recent reports suggest that screening MMG may not be appropriate in augmented women, but breast self-examination may be effective in these women. Ultrasonography (US) may be useful in screening augmented women without risk of rupturing the implant. In appropriate cases, magnetic resonance imaging should be considered as an adjunct to MMG and US. The question of whether augmented women should not undergo core needle biopsy because of the possibility of damage to the implant should be considered. This review discusses diagnostic methods for augmented women and suggests the optimal screening method for augmented women. The challenge of the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer in augmented women is important in order to detect more of their cancer at a preclinical stage, because we can expect to see breast cancer in augmented women with increasing frequency over the next decade.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2004 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. New York: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2005. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2004 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. New York: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2005.
2.
go back to reference Iinuma TJ. Time trend on the incidence risk of breast cancer among Japanese women—comparison between US and Japan. (in Japanese). Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2006;15:462. Iinuma TJ. Time trend on the incidence risk of breast cancer among Japanese women—comparison between US and Japan. (in Japanese). Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2006;15:462.
3.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P. The effect of silicone-gel-filled implants on mammography. Cancer. 1991;68:1159–63.PubMedCrossRef Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P. The effect of silicone-gel-filled implants on mammography. Cancer. 1991;68:1159–63.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Handel N, Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Jensen JA, Collins A. Factors affecting mammographic visualization of the breast after augmentation mammaplasty. JAMA. 1992;268:1913–7.PubMedCrossRef Handel N, Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Jensen JA, Collins A. Factors affecting mammographic visualization of the breast after augmentation mammaplasty. JAMA. 1992;268:1913–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Skinner KA, Silberman H, Dougherty W et al. Breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:138–44.PubMedCrossRef Skinner KA, Silberman H, Dougherty W et al. Breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:138–44.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Handel N, Silverstein MJ. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in augmented women. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:587–93.PubMedCrossRef Handel N, Silverstein MJ. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in augmented women. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:587–93.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1784–92.PubMedCrossRef Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1784–92.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:347–60.PubMed Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:347–60.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Morimoto T, Okazaki M, Endo T. Current status and goals of mammographic screening for breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2004;11:73–81.PubMedCrossRef Morimoto T, Okazaki M, Endo T. Current status and goals of mammographic screening for breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2004;11:73–81.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ohnuki K. Mammographic screening for non-palpable breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2005;12:258–66.PubMedCrossRef Ohnuki K. Mammographic screening for non-palpable breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2005;12:258–66.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dershaw DD, Chaglassian TA. Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty. Radiology. 1989;170:69–74.PubMed Dershaw DD, Chaglassian TA. Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty. Radiology. 1989;170:69–74.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Leibman AJ, Kruse B. Breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings after augmentation mammoplasty. Radiology. 1990;174:195–8.PubMed Leibman AJ, Kruse B. Breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings after augmentation mammoplasty. Radiology. 1990;174:195–8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:469–73.PubMed Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:469–73.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Fajardo LL, Harvey JA, McAleese KA, Roberts CC, Granstrom P. Breast cancer diagnosis in women with subglandular silicone gel filled augmentation implants. Radiology. 1995;194:859–62.PubMed Fajardo LL, Harvey JA, McAleese KA, Roberts CC, Granstrom P. Breast cancer diagnosis in women with subglandular silicone gel filled augmentation implants. Radiology. 1995;194:859–62.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, Mravunac M. Mammographically occult breast cancer. Cancer. 1983;52:1810–9.PubMedCrossRef Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, Mravunac M. Mammographically occult breast cancer. Cancer. 1983;52:1810–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Miglioretti DL, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Cutter G, Barlow WE, Rosenberg R, Weaver DL, Taplin SH, Ballard-Barbash R, Carney PA, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K. Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics. JAMA. 2004;28:442–50.CrossRef Miglioretti DL, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Cutter G, Barlow WE, Rosenberg R, Weaver DL, Taplin SH, Ballard-Barbash R, Carney PA, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K. Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics. JAMA. 2004;28:442–50.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Smathers RL, Boone JM, Lee LJ, Berns EA, Miller RA, Wright AM. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1414–21.PubMedCrossRef Smathers RL, Boone JM, Lee LJ, Berns EA, Miller RA, Wright AM. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1414–21.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA. Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet. 1997;350:1531–7.PubMedCrossRef Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA. Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet. 1997;350:1531–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brown SL, Todd JF, Luu HM. Breast implant adverse events during mammography: reports to the Food and Drug Administration. J Womens Health. 2004;13:371–80.CrossRef Brown SL, Todd JF, Luu HM. Breast implant adverse events during mammography: reports to the Food and Drug Administration. J Womens Health. 2004;13:371–80.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165–75.PubMedCrossRef Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165–75.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology. 2001;221:641–9.PubMedCrossRef Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology. 2001;221:641–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998;207:191–9.PubMed Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998;207:191–9.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer. 1995;76:626–30.PubMedCrossRef Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer. 1995;76:626–30.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hou MF, Ou-Yang F, Chuang CH, Wang JY, Lee LW, Huang YS, Huang CJ, Hsieh JS, Lai CS, Lin SD, Huang TJ. Comparison between sonography and mammography for breast cancer diagnosis in oriental women after augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:120–6.PubMedCrossRef Hou MF, Ou-Yang F, Chuang CH, Wang JY, Lee LW, Huang YS, Huang CJ, Hsieh JS, Lai CS, Lin SD, Huang TJ. Comparison between sonography and mammography for breast cancer diagnosis in oriental women after augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:120–6.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Liberman L. Breast cancer screening with MRI-what are the data for patients at high risk? N Eng J Med. 2004;351:497–500.CrossRef Liberman L. Breast cancer screening with MRI-what are the data for patients at high risk? N Eng J Med. 2004;351:497–500.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Huch RA, Kunzi W, Debatin JF, Wiesner W, Krestin GP. MR imaging of the augmented breast. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:371–6.PubMedCrossRef Huch RA, Kunzi W, Debatin JF, Wiesner W, Krestin GP. MR imaging of the augmented breast. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:371–6.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13–30.PubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13–30.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans C, Boetes C, Besnard P, Zonderland H, Obdeijn IM, Manoliu R, Kok T, Peterse H, Tilanus-Linthorst M, Muller S, Meijer S, Oosterwijk J, Beex L, Tollenaar R, Koning H, Rutgers E, Klijn J. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Eng J Med. 2004;351:427–37.CrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans C, Boetes C, Besnard P, Zonderland H, Obdeijn IM, Manoliu R, Kok T, Peterse H, Tilanus-Linthorst M, Muller S, Meijer S, Oosterwijk J, Beex L, Tollenaar R, Koning H, Rutgers E, Klijn J. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Eng J Med. 2004;351:427–37.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, Thickman D, Hylton N, Warner E, Pisano E, Schnitt SJ, Gatsonis C, Schnall M. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005;103:1898–905.PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, Thickman D, Hylton N, Warner E, Pisano E, Schnitt SJ, Gatsonis C, Schnall M. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005;103:1898–905.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jinde L, Jianliang S, Xiaoping C, Xiaoyan T, Jiaqing L, Qun M, Bo L. Anatomy and clinical significance of pectoral fascia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1557–60.PubMedCrossRef Jinde L, Jianliang S, Xiaoping C, Xiaoyan T, Jiaqing L, Qun M, Bo L. Anatomy and clinical significance of pectoral fascia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1557–60.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Zahavi A, Sklair ML, Ad-El DD. Capsular contracture of the breast. Working towards a better classification using clinical and radiologic assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:248–51.PubMedCrossRef Zahavi A, Sklair ML, Ad-El DD. Capsular contracture of the breast. Working towards a better classification using clinical and radiologic assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:248–51.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Liberman L. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1191–9.PubMed Liberman L. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1191–9.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Lamm RL. Stereotactic histologic biopsy in breasts with implants. Radiology. 2002;222:157–64.PubMedCrossRef Jackman RJ, Lamm RL. Stereotactic histologic biopsy in breasts with implants. Radiology. 2002;222:157–64.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Fornage BF, Sneige N, Singletary SE. Masses in breast with implants: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology. 1994;191:339–42.PubMed Fornage BF, Sneige N, Singletary SE. Masses in breast with implants: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology. 1994;191:339–42.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Lannin DR, Ponn T, Andrejeva L, Philpotts L. Should all breast cancers be diagnosed by needle biopsy? Am J Surg. 2006;192:450–4.PubMedCrossRef Lannin DR, Ponn T, Andrejeva L, Philpotts L. Should all breast cancers be diagnosed by needle biopsy? Am J Surg. 2006;192:450–4.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Monstrey S, Delanghe J, Christophe A, Dhooge W, de Greyt W, Bernarad D, van Landuyt K, Blondeel P. Biocompatibility and oxidative stability of radiolucent breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1429–34.PubMedCrossRef Monstrey S, Delanghe J, Christophe A, Dhooge W, de Greyt W, Bernarad D, van Landuyt K, Blondeel P. Biocompatibility and oxidative stability of radiolucent breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1429–34.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Monstrey S, Christophe A, Delanghe J, Vriese SD, Hamdi M, van Landuyt K, Blondeel P. What exactly was wrong with the trilucent breast implants? A unifying hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:847–56.PubMedCrossRef Monstrey S, Christophe A, Delanghe J, Vriese SD, Hamdi M, van Landuyt K, Blondeel P. What exactly was wrong with the trilucent breast implants? A unifying hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:847–56.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Scuderi N, Mazzocchi M, Alfano C, Onesti MG. Prospective study on trilucent soybean oil-filled breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1130–6.PubMedCrossRef Scuderi N, Mazzocchi M, Alfano C, Onesti MG. Prospective study on trilucent soybean oil-filled breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1130–6.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:1245–56.PubMedCrossRef Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:1245–56.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer in augmented women
Author
Takayoshi Uematsu
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-008-0036-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Breast Cancer 2/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine