Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Indian Journal of Surgery
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 1/2018

01-02-2018 | Original Article

Comparing Hemodynamic Symptoms and the Level of Abdominal Pain in High- Versus Low-Pressure Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors: A. R. Mohammadzade, F. Esmaili

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard to treat gallstone. To view the surgical site in this type of operations better, carbon dioxide is used with a certain pressure. The current study aimed to compare the hemodynamic symptoms and the level of abdominal pain due to using high- and low-pressure carbon dioxide in patients undergoing LC. The current double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients with the age range of 20–70 years old undergoing LC. The first and second groups experienced PaCO2 of 7–10 and 12–14 mmHg, respectively. The hemodynamic symptoms, abdominal pain, shoulder-tip pain, nausea and vomiting after the surgery, and the mean of liver function tests were evaluated. Data were analyzed using T test, Chi-square test, and repeated measures ANOVA by SPSS 16. Information of 60 patients in two groups was analyzed. There was a significant difference between the groups regarding the mean of systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05). The mean of heart rate was significantly higher in the high-pressure group during surgery and 1 h after that (P < 0.05). The frequency of pain in shoulder-tip and abdomen was higher in the high-pressure group. Frequency of nausea and vomiting 12 h after the surgery between two groups was significant (P < 0.05). The mean of alkaline phosphatase was higher in the low-pressure group than the high-pressure group (P < 0.05). Considering the good performance and low side effects of low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to those of high-pressure, this method can be replaced by high-pressure in LC.
Literature
1.
Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A et al (2003) Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J GastrointestSurg 7(5):642CrossRef
2.
3.
Brunicardi CF, Andersen DK, Billiar TR et al (2005) Schwartz’s principles of surgery. Vol 2. 8th ed. McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 1194–1204
4.
5.
Chok KS, Yuen WK, Lau H et al (2006) Prospective randomized trial on low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SurgLaparoscEndoscPercutan Tech 16:383–386. doi:10.​1097/​01.​sle.​0000213748.​00525.​1e
6.
7.
Esmat ME, Elsebae MM, Nasr MM et al (2006) Combined low pressure pneumoperitoneum and intraperitoneal infusion of normal saline for reducing shoulder tip pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 30:1969–1973CrossRefPubMed
8.
Catani M, Guerricchio R, De Milito R et al (2004) "Low-pressure" laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high risk patients (ASA III and IV): our experience. Chir Ital 56(1):71–80PubMed
9.
10.
11.
Kanwer DB, Kaman L, Nedounsejiane M et al (2009) Comparative study of low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a randomised controlled trial. Trop Gastroenterol 30(3):171–174PubMed
12.
13.
Imani F, Nezafati M, Heidarian M et al (2012) Effect of single dose premedication with pregabaline on pain after minor surgery(Persian). J Anesth Pain 2(8):180–185
14.
Vezakis A, Davides D, Gibson JS et al (1999) Randomized comparison between low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SrugEndosc 13(9):890–893. doi:10.​1007/​s004649901127
15.
16.
Sayadi S, Ebrahimi M, Khalilian A et al (2013) Effect of different carbon dioxide pressure on liver enzyme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. J MazandaranUniv Med Sci 23(98):92–96
17.
Hasukiæ S (2005) Postoperative changes in liver function tests: randomized comparisons of low and high pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SurgEndosc 19:1451–1455
Metadata
Title
Comparing Hemodynamic Symptoms and the Level of Abdominal Pain in High- Versus Low-Pressure Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Authors
A. R. Mohammadzade
F. Esmaili
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-016-1552-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Indian Journal of Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue

Original Article

The Charlson Comorbidity Index as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients

Original Article

Laparoscopic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy (LATE) for Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Original Article

Introducing In Vivo Dissection Modules for Undergraduate Level Trainees: What Is the Actual Benefit and How Could We Make It More Efficient?

Original Article

Ten-Year Experience of Managing Giant Duodenal Ulcer Perforations with Triple Tube Ostomy at Tertiary Hospital of North India

Editorial

Choosing Wisely in Surgery—a Perspective from the UK

Case Report

Rupture of Cystic Artery Pseudoaneurysm: a Rare Complication of Acute Cholecystitis