Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 4/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Article

Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (MIILE): A Single-Center Experience

Authors: Jun Wang, Mei-qing Xu, Ming-ran Xie, Xin-yu Mei

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

With the development of minimally invasive procedures, minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) has been proposed as a safe and feasible surgical choice for the treatment of esophageal cancer. This retrospective study evaluated MIILE results from a single medical center. A total of 619 patients were selected as candidates for Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy from December 2011 to May 2015, in which 334 patients accepted MIILE and 285 patients accepted open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (OILE). General characteristics, surgical data, complication rates, and survival were analyzed. Differences in general characteristics between groups were not significant. Intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01), postoperative volume of drainage for the first day (P < 0.01), time to drain removal (P ≤ 0.01), wound infection rate (P = 0.04), and length of hospital stay (P < 0.01) were significantly reduced in the MIILE group. There were no statistically significant differences in general morbidity (P = 0.56), the total swept lymph nodes (P = 0.47), mortality (P = 0.34), and survival rate at 3 years (P = 0.63). MIILE is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of esophageal cancer, in which good outcomes were reported and some advantages were found over the open procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lin Y, Yukari T, He Y, Shogo K et al (2013) Epidemiology of esophageal cancer in Japan and China. J Epidemiol 23(4):233–242CrossRefPubMed Lin Y, Yukari T, He Y, Shogo K et al (2013) Epidemiology of esophageal cancer in Japan and China. J Epidemiol 23(4):233–242CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TCK et al (2011) End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study[J]. Ann Surg 254(2):226–233CrossRefPubMed Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TCK et al (2011) End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study[J]. Ann Surg 254(2):226–233CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic esophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:7–11PubMed Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic esophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:7–11PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cuesta MA, Scheepers JJG, Oosterhuis W et al (2010) Thoracoscopic esophageal resection for cancer in prone decubitus position: operative technique[M]. Atlas of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Esophageal Carcinoma. Springer, London, pp 149–169CrossRef Cuesta MA, Scheepers JJG, Oosterhuis W et al (2010) Thoracoscopic esophageal resection for cancer in prone decubitus position: operative technique[M]. Atlas of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Esophageal Carcinoma. Springer, London, pp 149–169CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smith WD, Dakwar E, Le TV et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery for traumatic spinal pathologies: a mini-open, lateral approach in the thoracic and lumbar spine[J]. Spine 35(26):338–346CrossRef Smith WD, Dakwar E, Le TV et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery for traumatic spinal pathologies: a mini-open, lateral approach in the thoracic and lumbar spine[J]. Spine 35(26):338–346CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fischer Josef E (2012) Laparoscopic esophagectomy. Mastery of surgery, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA, pp 823–832 Fischer Josef E (2012) Laparoscopic esophagectomy. Mastery of surgery, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA, pp 823–832
7.
go back to reference Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH et al (2003) Outcomes after esophagectomy : a ten year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 75(1):217, discussion: 222CrossRefPubMed Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH et al (2003) Outcomes after esophagectomy : a ten year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 75(1):217, discussion: 222CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DI (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir 64:121PubMed Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DI (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir 64:121PubMed
9.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238(4):486PubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238(4):486PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM et al (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135:920CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM et al (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135:920CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kim K, Park JS, Seo H (2013) Early outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) Ivor-Lewis operation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the extracorporeal anastomosis technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:303–308CrossRefPubMed Kim K, Park JS, Seo H (2013) Early outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) Ivor-Lewis operation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the extracorporeal anastomosis technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:303–308CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pennathur A, Awais O, Luketich JD (2010) Technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 89(Suppl):2159–2162CrossRef Pennathur A, Awais O, Luketich JD (2010) Technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 89(Suppl):2159–2162CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer F, Riegler M, Fleischman E, Zacherl J (2009) Fifty-five minimally invasive esophagectomies: a single centre experience. Anticancer Res 29:2719–2725PubMed Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer F, Riegler M, Fleischman E, Zacherl J (2009) Fifty-five minimally invasive esophagectomies: a single centre experience. Anticancer Res 29:2719–2725PubMed
14.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248:1081–1091CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248:1081–1091CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Puntambekar SP, Agarwal GA, Joshi SN, Rayate NV, Sathe RM, Patil AM (2010) Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 24:2407–2414CrossRefPubMed Puntambekar SP, Agarwal GA, Joshi SN, Rayate NV, Sathe RM, Patil AM (2010) Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 24:2407–2414CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRefPubMed Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bakhos CT, Fabian T, Oyasiji TO et al (2012) Impact of the surgical technique on pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 93:221–227CrossRefPubMed Bakhos CT, Fabian T, Oyasiji TO et al (2012) Impact of the surgical technique on pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 93:221–227CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Howard D, Rossidis G, Hochwald SN (2012) Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc 26:162–167CrossRefPubMed Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Howard D, Rossidis G, Hochwald SN (2012) Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc 26:162–167CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D et al (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 87(3):911–919CrossRefPubMed Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D et al (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 87(3):911–919CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S (2009) Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg 33(9):1868–1875CrossRefPubMed Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S (2009) Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg 33(9):1868–1875CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (MIILE): A Single-Center Experience
Authors
Jun Wang
Mei-qing Xu
Ming-ran Xie
Xin-yu Mei
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-016-1519-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Indian Journal of Surgery 4/2017 Go to the issue

Images in Surgery

A Field Fire Ulcer