Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Article

A Randomised Prospective Study to Evaluate Preperitoneal Mesh Repair Versus Onlay Mesh Repair and Laparoscopic IPOM in Incisional Hernia Surgery

Authors: S. Natarajan, S. Meenaa, K. A. Thimmaiah

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Incisional hernia remains a very common postoperative complication. These are encountered with an incidence of up to 20 % following laparotomy. These hernias enlarge over time, making the repair difficult, and serious complications like bowel obstruction, strangulation and enterocutaneous fistula can occur. Hence, elective repair is indicated to avoid these complications. Implantation of a prosthetic mesh is nowadays considered as the standard treatment due to low hernia recurrence. The most common mesh repair techniques used are the onlay repair, sublay repair and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). However, it is still not clear which technique among the three is superior. A study consisting of 30 patients who underwent incisional hernia repair by onlay, laparoscopic and preperitoneal mesh repair with abdominoplasty was conducted in the Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital. Of the three groups, the preperitoneal repair with abdominoplasty was found to have better patient compliance and satisfaction with regard to occurrence of complications and appearance of the abdominal wall without laxity in a single sitting.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006438 Den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006438
4.
go back to reference de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, de Jong D et al (2004) Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia 8(1):56–59CrossRefPubMed de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, de Jong D et al (2004) Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia 8(1):56–59CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kurzer M, Kark A, Selouk S, Belsham P et al (2008) Open mesh repair of incisional hernia using a sublay technique: long-term follow-up. World J Surg 32(1):31–36CrossRefPubMed Kurzer M, Kark A, Selouk S, Belsham P et al (2008) Open mesh repair of incisional hernia using a sublay technique: long-term follow-up. World J Surg 32(1):31–36CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference 'Wéber G, Baracs J, Horváth OP, et al. Onlay mesh provides significantly better results than sublay reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh—results of a five-year follow-up 'Wéber G, Baracs J, Horváth OP, et al. Onlay mesh provides significantly better results than sublay reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh—results of a five-year follow-up
Metadata
Title
A Randomised Prospective Study to Evaluate Preperitoneal Mesh Repair Versus Onlay Mesh Repair and Laparoscopic IPOM in Incisional Hernia Surgery
Authors
S. Natarajan
S. Meenaa
K. A. Thimmaiah
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1430-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Indian Journal of Surgery 2/2017 Go to the issue