Top

Published in:

01-04-2020 | Original Article

The Development and Application of Virtual Reality Animation Simulation Technology: Take Gastroscopy Simulation System as an Example

Authors: Qianru Wang, Chunjiao Li, Zhongli Xie, Zhiguo Bu, Liwei Shi, Chuan Wang, Feng Jiang

Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research | Issue 2/2020

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) technology has a great potential in the field of medical simulation due to its immersion, interactivity and autonomy. It provides a new direction for integration and application in various disciplines. Combination of VR technology and clinical practice brings great convenience for medical education and experiments. Modern VR simulators can create realistic environments that capture minute anatomical details with high accuracy and solves the problem of difficulty in mass productions with traditional devices. Taking gastroscopy simulation system as an example, this paper discusses the development and application of VR animation technology, together with its excellent performance and current research status in surgery, scientific research, training and education.

Schroeder R (1993) Virtual reality in the real world: history, applications and projections. Futures 25(9):963–973

Gatica-Rojas V, Méndez-Rebolledo G (2014) Virtual reality interface devices in the reorganization of neural networks in the brain of patients with neurological diseases. Neural Regen Res 9(8):888–896PubMedPubMedCentral

Harpham-Lockyer L, Laskaratos FM, Berlingieri P, Epstein O (2015) Role of virtual reality simulation in endoscopy training. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7(18):1287–1294PubMedPubMedCentral

Wang W, Tang L, Zhao XF, Huang JS (2015) About the thinking of high simulation equipment's application on clinical medical practice teaching. Pop Sci Tech 15(5):153–154,140 (in Chinese)

Guze PA (2015) Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 126:260–270PubMedPubMedCentral

Kin T, Nakatomi H, Shono N, Nomura S, Saito T, Oyama H, Saito N (2017) Neurosurgical virtual reality simulation for brain tumor using high-definition computer graphics: a review of the literature. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 57(10):513–520

Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146–150PubMed

Coleman J, Nduka CC, Darzi A (1994) Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 81(12):1709–1711PubMed

Mousnier A, Kubat N, Massias-Simon A, Ségéral E, Rain JC, Benarous R, Emiliani S, Dargemont C (2007) von Hippel Lindau binding protein 1-mediated degradation of integrase affects HIV-1 gene expression at a postintegration step. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(34):13615–13620PubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Alaker M, Wynn GR, Arulampalam T (2016) Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Int J Surg 29:85–94PubMed

11.

Seymour NE (2008) VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 32(2):182–188PubMed

12.

Kundhal PS, Grantcharov TP (2009) Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room. Surg Endosc 23(3):645–649PubMed

13.

Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lönroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16(9):1324–1328PubMed

14.

Qi XY, Lu W, Han FT, Liu HQ, Cao YX (2012) Researching and application of virtual simulation teaching in medical imaging equipment teaching. Chin J Med Phys 29(1):3208–3210 (in Chinese)

15.

de Visser H, Watson MO, Salvado O, Passenger JD (2011) Progress in virtual reality simulators for surgical training and certification. Med J Aust 194(4):S38–S40PubMed

16.

Arnold SH, Svendsen MB, Konge L, Svendsen LB, Preisler L (2015) Three-dimensional motion tracking correlates with skill level in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 47(9):825–828PubMed

17.

Latypov NN, Latypov NN (1999) Method for tracking and displaying user's spatial position and orientation, a method for representing virtual reality for a user, and systems of embodiment of such methods. US. US 6005548 A.

18.

Burdea GC (1996) Force and touch feedback for virtual reality. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

19.

Wang P, Becker AA, Jones IA, Glover AT, Benford SD, Greenhalgh CM, Vloeberghs M (2006) A virtual reality surgery simulation of cutting and retraction in neurosurgery with force-feedback. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 84(1):11–18

20.

Maschuw K, Hassan I, Bartsch DK (2010) Surgical training using simulator. Virtual reality. Chirurg 81(1):19–24PubMed

21.

Badash I, Burtt K, Solorzano CA, Carey JN (2016) Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques. Ann Transl Med 4(23):453PubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Gorman PJ, Meier AH, Krummel TM (1999) Simulation and virtual reality in surgical education: real or unreal? Arch Surg 134(11):1203–1208PubMed

23.

Zhang WB, Cao L, Xiong JJ (2016) The realistic challenges of virtual reality technology. Sci Sin Inform 46(12):1779–1784 (in Chinese)

24.

Burdea GC, Coiffet P (2003) Virtual reality technology, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, USA

25.

Sakakushev BE, Marinov BI, Stefanova PP, Kostianev SS, Georgiou EK (2007) Striving for better medical education: the simulation approach. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 59(2):123–131

26.

Zhang L, Grosdemouge C, Arikatla VS, Ahn W, Sankaranarayanan G, De S, Jones D, Schwaitzberg S, Cao CG (2012) The added value of virtual reality technology and forcefeedback for surgical training simulators. Work 41(Suppl 1):2288–2292PubMed

Title: The Development and Application of Virtual Reality Animation Simulation Technology: Take Gastroscopy Simulation System as an Example
Authors: Qianru Wang
Chunjiao Li
Zhongli Xie
Zhiguo Bu
Liwei Shi
Chuan Wang
Feng Jiang
Publication date: 01-04-2020
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1219-4956
Electronic ISSN: 1532-2807
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-019-00590-8

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

The Association between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Radiochemotherapy Response in Cervical Cancer

Intensity of Nuclear Staining for Ki-67, p53 and Survivin as a New Prognostic Factor in Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Immunohistochemical Staining in the Assessment of Melanoma Tumor Thickness

Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Represents a Powerful Prognostic Tool of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Prognostic Significance of Serum PSA Level and Telomerase, VEGF and GLUT-1 Protein Expression for the Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy

Epstein-Barr Virus MicroRNAs in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer