Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research 4/2009

01-12-2009

Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status After Positive Sentinel Biopsy in Breast Cancer: What Model Performs the Best in a Czech Population?

Authors: Oldřich Coufal, Tomáš Pavlík, Pavel Fabian, Rita Bori, Gábor Boross, István Sejben, Róbert Maráz, Jaroslav Koča, Eva Krejčí, Iva Horáková, Vendula Foltinová, Pavlína Vrtělová, Vojtech Chrenko, Wolde Eliza Tekle, Mária Rajtár, Mihály Svébis, Vuk Fait, Gábor Cserni

Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Several models have previously been proposed to predict the probability of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of two previously published nomograms (MSKCC, Stanford) and to develop an alternative model with the best predictive accuracy in a Czech population. In the basic population of 330 SLN-positive patients from the Czech Republic, the accuracy of the MSKCC and the Stanford nomograms was tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). A new model (MOU nomogram) was proposed according to the results of multivariate analysis of relevant clinicopathologic variables. The new model was validated in an independent test population from Hungary (383 patients). In the basic population, six of 27 patients with isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the SLN harbored additional NSLN metastases. The AUCs of the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms were 0.68 and 0.66, respectively; for the MOU nomogram it reached 0.76. In the test population, the AUC of the MOU nomogram was similar to that of the basic population (0.74). The presence of only ITC in SLN does not preclude further nodal involvement. Additional variables are beneficial when considering the probability of NSLN metastases. In the basic population, the previously published nomograms (MSKCC and Stanford) showed only limited accuracy. The developed MOU nomogram proved more suitable for the basic population, such as for another independent population from a mid-European country.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Park J, Fey JV, Naik AM, Borgen PI, Van Zee KJ, Cody HS 3rd (2007) A declining rate of completion axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients is associated with the use of a multivariate nomogram. Ann Surg 245:462–468CrossRefPubMed Park J, Fey JV, Naik AM, Borgen PI, Van Zee KJ, Cody HS 3rd (2007) A declining rate of completion axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients is associated with the use of a multivariate nomogram. Ann Surg 245:462–468CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hwang RF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Yi M et al (2007) Low locoregional failure rates in selected breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes who do not undergo completion axillary dissection. Cancer 10:723–730CrossRef Hwang RF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Yi M et al (2007) Low locoregional failure rates in selected breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes who do not undergo completion axillary dissection. Cancer 10:723–730CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL et al (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patient with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1140–1151CrossRefPubMed Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL et al (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patient with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1140–1151CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G et al (2005) Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 190:543–550CrossRefPubMed Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G et al (2005) Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 190:543–550CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cripe MH, Beran LC, Liang WC, Sickle-Santanello BJ (2006) The likelihood of additional nodal disease following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: validation of a nomogram. Am J Surg 192:484–487CrossRefPubMed Cripe MH, Beran LC, Liang WC, Sickle-Santanello BJ (2006) The likelihood of additional nodal disease following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: validation of a nomogram. Am J Surg 192:484–487CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Smidt ML, Kuster DM, van der Wilt GJ, Thunnissen FB, Van Zee KJ, Strobbe LJ (2005) Can the memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands? Ann Surg Oncol 12:1066–1072CrossRefPubMed Smidt ML, Kuster DM, van der Wilt GJ, Thunnissen FB, Van Zee KJ, Strobbe LJ (2005) Can the memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands? Ann Surg Oncol 12:1066–1072CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Soni NK, Carmalt HL, Gillett DJ, Spillane AJ (2005) Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:958–964CrossRefPubMed Soni NK, Carmalt HL, Gillett DJ, Spillane AJ (2005) Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:958–964CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lambert LA, Ayers GD, Hwang RF et al (2006) Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:310–320CrossRefPubMed Lambert LA, Ayers GD, Hwang RF et al (2006) Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:310–320CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Mariani L et al (2007) Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. Am J Surg 193:686–692CrossRefPubMed Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Mariani L et al (2007) Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. Am J Surg 193:686–692CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kocsis L, Svébis M, Boross G et al (2004) Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am Surg 70:1019–1024PubMed Kocsis L, Svébis M, Boross G et al (2004) Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am Surg 70:1019–1024PubMed
11.
go back to reference Zgajnar J, Perhavec A, Hocevar M et al (2007) Low performance of the MSKCC nomogram in preoperatively ultrasonically negative axillary lymph node in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 96:547–553CrossRefPubMed Zgajnar J, Perhavec A, Hocevar M et al (2007) Low performance of the MSKCC nomogram in preoperatively ultrasonically negative axillary lymph node in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 96:547–553CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Alran S, De Rycke Y, Fourchotte V et al (2007) Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2195–2201CrossRefPubMed Alran S, De Rycke Y, Fourchotte V et al (2007) Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2195–2201CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pal A, Provenzano E, Duffy SW, Pinder SE, Purushotham AD (2008) A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive. Br J Surg 95:302–309CrossRefPubMed Pal A, Provenzano E, Duffy SW, Pinder SE, Purushotham AD (2008) A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive. Br J Surg 95:302–309CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Klar M, Jochmann A, Foeldi M et al (2008) The MSKCC nomogram for prediction the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement in a German breast cancer population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:523–531CrossRefPubMed Klar M, Jochmann A, Foeldi M et al (2008) The MSKCC nomogram for prediction the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement in a German breast cancer population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:523–531CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Poirier E, Sideris L, Dubé P, Drolet P, Meterissian SH (2008) Analysis of clinical applicability of the breast cancer nomogram for positive sentinel lymph node: the canadian experience. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2562–2567CrossRefPubMed Poirier E, Sideris L, Dubé P, Drolet P, Meterissian SH (2008) Analysis of clinical applicability of the breast cancer nomogram for positive sentinel lymph node: the canadian experience. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2562–2567CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kohrt HE, Olshen RA, Bermas HR et al (2008) New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 8:66CrossRefPubMed Kohrt HE, Olshen RA, Bermas HR et al (2008) New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 8:66CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR et al (2005) American society of clinical oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7703–7720CrossRefPubMed Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR et al (2005) American society of clinical oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7703–7720CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (eds) (2002) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 6th Edn. Wiley & Sons, New Jersey Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (eds) (2002) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 6th Edn. Wiley & Sons, New Jersey
19.
go back to reference Houvenaeghel G, Nos C, Mignotte H et al (2006) Micrometastases in sentinel lymph node in a multicentric study: predictive factors of nonsentinel lymph node involvement–Groupe des Chirurgiens de la Federation des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:1814–1822CrossRefPubMed Houvenaeghel G, Nos C, Mignotte H et al (2006) Micrometastases in sentinel lymph node in a multicentric study: predictive factors of nonsentinel lymph node involvement–Groupe des Chirurgiens de la Federation des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:1814–1822CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cserni G, Rajtár M, Boross G et al (2002) Comparison of vital dye-guided lymphatic mapping and dye plus gamma probe-guided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. World J Surg 26:592–597CrossRefPubMed Cserni G, Rajtár M, Boross G et al (2002) Comparison of vital dye-guided lymphatic mapping and dye plus gamma probe-guided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. World J Surg 26:592–597CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Cserni G (2002) Complete sectioning of axillary sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. Analysis of two different step sectioning and immunohistochemistry protocols in 246 patients. J Clin Pathol 55:926–931CrossRefPubMed Cserni G (2002) Complete sectioning of axillary sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. Analysis of two different step sectioning and immunohistochemistry protocols in 246 patients. J Clin Pathol 55:926–931CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed
25.
go back to reference Cserni G, Bianchi S, Vezzosi V et al (2008) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in staging small (up to 15 mm) breast carcinomas. Results from a European multi-institutional study. Pathol Oncol Res 14:117–121CrossRefPubMed Cserni G, Bianchi S, Vezzosi V et al (2008) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in staging small (up to 15 mm) breast carcinomas. Results from a European multi-institutional study. Pathol Oncol Res 14:117–121CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Turner RR, Weaver DL, Cserni G et al (2008) Nodal stage classification for breast carcinoma: improving interobserver reproducibility through standardized histologic criteria and image-based training. J Clin Oncol 26:258–263CrossRefPubMed Turner RR, Weaver DL, Cserni G et al (2008) Nodal stage classification for breast carcinoma: improving interobserver reproducibility through standardized histologic criteria and image-based training. J Clin Oncol 26:258–263CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference de Mascarel I, MacGrogan G, Debled M, Brouste V, Mauriac L (2008) Distinction between isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in breast cancer: is it reliable and useful? Cancer 112:1672–1678CrossRefPubMed de Mascarel I, MacGrogan G, Debled M, Brouste V, Mauriac L (2008) Distinction between isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in breast cancer: is it reliable and useful? Cancer 112:1672–1678CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Cserni G, Bianchi S, Vezzosi V et al (2008) Variations in sentinel node isolated tumour cells/micrometastasis and non-sentinel node involvement rates according to different interpretations of the TNM definitions. Eur J Cancer 44:2185–2191CrossRefPubMed Cserni G, Bianchi S, Vezzosi V et al (2008) Variations in sentinel node isolated tumour cells/micrometastasis and non-sentinel node involvement rates according to different interpretations of the TNM definitions. Eur J Cancer 44:2185–2191CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Cserni G (2007) Comparison of different validation studies on the use of the Memorial-Sloan Kettering cancer center nomogram predicting nonsentinel node involvement in sentinel node-positive breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 194:699–700CrossRefPubMed Cserni G (2007) Comparison of different validation studies on the use of the Memorial-Sloan Kettering cancer center nomogram predicting nonsentinel node involvement in sentinel node-positive breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 194:699–700CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status After Positive Sentinel Biopsy in Breast Cancer: What Model Performs the Best in a Czech Population?
Authors
Oldřich Coufal
Tomáš Pavlík
Pavel Fabian
Rita Bori
Gábor Boross
István Sejben
Róbert Maráz
Jaroslav Koča
Eva Krejčí
Iva Horáková
Vendula Foltinová
Pavlína Vrtělová
Vojtech Chrenko
Wolde Eliza Tekle
Mária Rajtár
Mihály Svébis
Vuk Fait
Gábor Cserni
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1219-4956
Electronic ISSN: 1532-2807
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-009-9177-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Pathology & Oncology Research 4/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine