Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 4/2017

01-12-2017

General equations for optimal selection of diagnostic image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging

Author: Xiaoming Zheng

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to examine the effects of relationship functions between diagnostic image quality and radiation dose on the governing equations for image acquisition parameter variations in X-ray imaging. Various equations were derived for the optimal selection of peak kilovoltage (kVp) and exposure parameter (milliAmpere second, mAs) in computed tomography (CT), computed radiography (CR), and direct digital radiography. Logistic, logarithmic, and linear functions were employed to establish the relationship between radiation dose and diagnostic image quality. The radiation dose to the patient, as a function of image acquisition parameters (kVp, mAs) and patient size (d), was used in radiation dose and image quality optimization. Both logistic and logarithmic functions resulted in the same governing equation for optimal selection of image acquisition parameters using a dose efficiency index. For image quality as a linear function of radiation dose, the same governing equation was derived from the linear relationship. The general equations should be used in guiding clinical X-ray imaging through optimal selection of image acquisition parameters. The radiation dose to the patient could be reduced from current levels in medical X-ray imaging.
Literature
1.
go back to reference UNSCEAR 2008. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation Volume II. Report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. New York. United Nations; 2010. UNSCEAR 2008. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation Volume II. Report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. New York. United Nations; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:202–8.CrossRefPubMed Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:202–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Silverman JD, Paul NS, Siewerdsen JH. Investigation of lung nodule detectability in low-dose 320-slice computed tomography. Med Phys. 2009;36(5):1700–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silverman JD, Paul NS, Siewerdsen JH. Investigation of lung nodule detectability in low-dose 320-slice computed tomography. Med Phys. 2009;36(5):1700–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Zheng X, Kim TM, Davidson R, Lee S, Shin C, Yang S. CT X-ray tube voltage optimisation and image reconstruction evaluation using visual grading analysis. Proc of SPIE (Med Imaging). 2014;9033:903328_1–10. Zheng X, Kim TM, Davidson R, Lee S, Shin C, Yang S. CT X-ray tube voltage optimisation and image reconstruction evaluation using visual grading analysis. Proc of SPIE (Med Imaging). 2014;9033:903328_1–10.
6.
go back to reference Compagnone G, Casadio Baleni M, Di Nicola E, Valentino M, Benati M, Calzolaio LF, Oberhofer N, Fabbri E, Domenichelli S, Barozzi L. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors. Radiol Med. 2013;118:540–54.CrossRefPubMed Compagnone G, Casadio Baleni M, Di Nicola E, Valentino M, Benati M, Calzolaio LF, Oberhofer N, Fabbri E, Domenichelli S, Barozzi L. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors. Radiol Med. 2013;118:540–54.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zheng X, Kim M, Yang S. Optimal kVp in chest computed radiography using visual grading scores: a comparison between visual grading characteristics and ordinal regression analysis. Proc of SPIE (Med Imaging). 2016;9783:97836A1–8.CrossRef Zheng X, Kim M, Yang S. Optimal kVp in chest computed radiography using visual grading scores: a comparison between visual grading characteristics and ordinal regression analysis. Proc of SPIE (Med Imaging). 2016;9783:97836A1–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Van der Plaats GJ. Medical X-ray techniques in diagnostic radiology. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd; 1980.CrossRef Van der Plaats GJ. Medical X-ray techniques in diagnostic radiology. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd; 1980.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference International commission on radiation units and measurements. ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU. 2012;12(1):1–149. International commission on radiation units and measurements. ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU. 2012;12(1):1–149.
11.
go back to reference Zheng X. Patient size based guiding equations for automatic mAs and kVp selections in general medical X-ray projection radiography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2017;174(4):545–50. Zheng X. Patient size based guiding equations for automatic mAs and kVp selections in general medical X-ray projection radiography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2017;174(4):545–50.
12.
go back to reference Williams MB, Krupinski EA, Strauss KJ, Breeden WK, Rzeszotarski MS. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:371–88.CrossRefPubMed Williams MB, Krupinski EA, Strauss KJ, Breeden WK, Rzeszotarski MS. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:371–88.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference AAPM Task Group 116. An exposure indicator for digital radiography. College Park: American Association of Physicists in medicine; 2009. ISBN 978-1-888340-86-0. AAPM Task Group 116. An exposure indicator for digital radiography. College Park: American Association of Physicists in medicine; 2009. ISBN 978-1-888340-86-0.
14.
go back to reference Yu L, Li H, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys. 2010;37:234–43.CrossRefPubMed Yu L, Li H, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys. 2010;37:234–43.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ching W, Robinson J, McEntee M. Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systemic review. J Med Rad Sci. 2014;61:176–90.CrossRef Ching W, Robinson J, McEntee M. Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systemic review. J Med Rad Sci. 2014;61:176–90.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1996. ISBN 92-827-7843-6. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1996. ISBN 92-827-7843-6.
17.
go back to reference ICRP, Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M, Appelgate K, Sanchez R. ICRP Publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnosis and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP 2013;42(2):1–63.CrossRef ICRP, Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M, Appelgate K, Sanchez R. ICRP Publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnosis and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP 2013;42(2):1–63.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Macmillan NA, Gougalas C. Detection theory: a user’s guide. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2004. Macmillan NA, Gougalas C. Detection theory: a user’s guide. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2004.
20.
go back to reference Strasburger H. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Percept Psychophys. 2001;63(8):1348–55.CrossRefPubMed Strasburger H. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Percept Psychophys. 2001;63(8):1348–55.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference DeCarlo LT. Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(2):186–205.CrossRef DeCarlo LT. Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(2):186–205.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Verdun FR, Racine D, Ott JG, Tapiovaara MJ, Toroi P, Bochud FO, Veldkamp WJH, Schegerer A, Bouwman RW, Hernandez Giron I, Marshall NW, Edyvean S. Image quality in CT: from physical measurements to model observers. Phys Med. 2015;31:823–43.CrossRefPubMed Verdun FR, Racine D, Ott JG, Tapiovaara MJ, Toroi P, Bochud FO, Veldkamp WJH, Schegerer A, Bouwman RW, Hernandez Giron I, Marshall NW, Edyvean S. Image quality in CT: from physical measurements to model observers. Phys Med. 2015;31:823–43.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
General equations for optimal selection of diagnostic image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging
Author
Xiaoming Zheng
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-017-0413-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Radiological Physics and Technology 4/2017 Go to the issue