Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2/2017

01-06-2017 | Orthopaedic Health Policy (A Miller, section editor)

Accessibility, accountability, affordability: healthcare policy in orthopedic trauma

Authors: Renee C. Genova, Rachel L. Box, James R. Ficke

Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of review

This review provides historical background on trauma care in the USA and summarizes contemporary trauma-related health policy issues. It is a primer for orthopedic surgeons who want to promote improvements in research, delivery, and cost reduction in trauma care.

Recent findings

As of 2010, funding for trauma research accounted for only 0.02% of all National Institutes of Health research funding. This is disproportionate to the societal burden of traumatic injury, which is the leading cause of death and disability among people aged 1 to 46 years in the USA. The diagnosis-related group model of hospital reimbursement penalizes level-I trauma centers, which typically treat the most severely injured patients. Treatment of traumatic injury at level-I and level-II trauma centers is associated with lower rates of major complications and death compared with treatment at non-trauma centers. Patient proximity to trauma centers has been positively correlated with survival after traumatic injury. Inadequate funding has been cited as a reason for recent closures of trauma centers.

Summary

Orthopedic surgeons have a responsibility to engage in efforts to improve the quality, accessibility, and affordability of trauma care. This can be done by advocating for greater funding for trauma research; choosing the most cost-effective, patient-appropriate orthopedic implants; supporting the implementation of a national trauma system; leading high-quality research of trauma patient outcomes; and advocating for greater accessibility to level-I trauma centers for underserved populations.
Literature
1.
2.
Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank; 1996.
3.
Trunkey DD. History and development of trauma care in the United States. Clin Orthop. 2000;374:36–46.CrossRef
4.
MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366–78. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMsa052049.CrossRefPubMed
5.
National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council Committee on Trauma, National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council Committee on Shock. Accidental death and disability: the neglected disease of modern society. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Copyright (c) National Academy of Sciences; 1966.
6.
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act. Pub. L. 89–563, § 1, 80 Stat. 718. 1966
7.
8.
Institute of Medicine (US), National Research Council (US) Committee on Trauma Research. Injury in America: a continuing public health problem. 1st ed. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1985.
9.
Trauma Care Systems Planning and Development Act HR 1602, 101st Leg. 1990.
10.
11.
Sampalis JS, Lavoie A, Williams JI, Mulder DS, Kalina M. Impact of on-site care, prehospital time, and level of in-hospital care on survival in severely injured patients. J Trauma. 1993;34(2):252–61.CrossRefPubMed
12.
•• Carr BG, Bowman AJ, Wolff CS, Mullen MT, Holena DN, Branas CC, et al. Disparities in access to trauma care in the United States: a population-based analysis. Injury. 2017;48(2):332–8. doi:10.​1016/​j.​injury.​2017.​01.​008. This cross-sectional study included the entire US population to evaluate overall access to trauma care and factors associated with lack of access to care. Populations already considered vulerable secondary to rural location, insurance status, and income lacked access to trauma care. CrossRefPubMed
13.
• Hsia RY, Srebotnjak T, Maselli J, Crandall M, Mcculloch C, Kellermann AL. The association of trauma center closures with increased inpatient mortality for injured patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):1048–54. doi:10.​1097/​ta.​0000000000000166​. The trend of trauma center closures had been well documented and was widely known; however, this was the first study to demonstrate the association of these closures with increased mortality for the injured in the state of California. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
16.
17.
Mullins RJ. A historical perspective of trauma system development in the United States. J Trauma. 1999;47(3 Suppl):S8–14.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Benbassat J, Taragin M. Hospital readmissions as a measure of quality of health care: advantages and limitations. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(8):1074–81.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
• Althausen PL, Lapham J, Mead L. Financial impact of dual vendor, matrix pricing, and sole-source contracting on implant costs. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(Suppl 5):S37–s9. doi:10.​1097/​bot.​0000000000000719​. Demonstrates the significant cost savings to the patient, hospital, and health system that can be achieved when the orthopaedic surgeon is involved in the implant cost negotiations. CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Lochner HV, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd. Type-II error rates (beta errors) of randomized trials in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-a(11):1650–5.CrossRefPubMed
28.
•• Davis KA, Fabian TC, Cioffi WG. The toll of death and disability from traumatic injury in the United States—the “neglected disease” of modern society, still neglected after 50 years. JAMA Surg. 2016; doi:10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2016.​4625. Redemonstrates the growing discrepancy between the disease burden for trauma versus other disease processes and their funding and calls into question the lack of action, attention, and funding directed at injury. PubMed
29.
Jenkins DH, Cioffi WG, Cocanour CS, Davis KA, Fabian TC, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Position statement of the Coalition for National Trauma Research on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report, a National Trauma Care System: integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(5):816–8. doi:10.​1097/​ta.​0000000000001218​.CrossRefPubMed
30.
•• Berwick DM, Downey AS, Cornett E, National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.), Committee on Military Trauma Care’s Learning Health System and Its Translation to the Civilian Sector, National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.), et al. A national trauma care system: integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2016. Echoes the disappointment with the lack of action at improving the care for the injured and established a military and civilian collaborative committee charged with an aggressive effort to establish a National Trauma Care System that will function as a learning feedback system and build on a continuous evidence-based process improvement model that will ensure the needed in advancements in trauma care and ultimately result in zero preventable deaths. CrossRef
31.
•• Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC). Building a clinical research network in trauma orthopaedics: the Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC). J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(7):353–61. doi:10.​1097/​bot.​0000000000000549​. The success this collaborative network of civilian level-I trauma centers and military centers has had in multicenter prospective sutdies demonstrates the great potential for an even larger collaboration aimed at improving the overall care of injured patients guided by evidence-based medicine. CrossRef
32.
Okike K, O'Toole RV, Pollak AN, Bishop JA, McAndrew CM, Mehta S, et al. Survey finds few orthopedic surgeons know the costs of the devices they implant. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2014;33(1):103–9. doi:10.​1377/​hlthaff.​2013.​0453.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accessibility, accountability, affordability: healthcare policy in orthopedic trauma
Authors
Renee C. Genova
Rachel L. Box
James R. Ficke
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Issue 2/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9414-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2/2017 Go to the issue

Social Media and Orthopedics (P Sculco, section editor)

The future of social media in orthopedic surgery

Orthopaedic Health Policy (A Miller, section editor)

Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness in orthopedics: how to measure outcomes and deliver value in a constantly changing healthcare environment

Orthopaedic Health Policy (A Miller, section editor)

Osteoporosis: a discussion on the past 5 years

Motion Preserving Spine Surgery (C Kepler, section editor)

Lumbar disc replacement surgery—successes and obstacles to widespread adoption

Orthopaedic Health Policy (A Miller, section editor)

Bundled payments in total joint arthroplasty and spine surgery

Motion Preserving Spine Surgery (C Kepler, section editor)

Cervical disc replacement surgery: biomechanical properties, postoperative motion, and postoperative activity levels