Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 1/2012

01-03-2012 | Hip Rehabilitation (J Edelstein, Section Editor)

Post-operative guidelines following hip arthroscopy

Authors: Jaime Edelstein, Anil Ranawat, Keelan R. Enseki, Richard J. Yun, Peter Draovitch

Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy can vary significantly. Existing programs have been developed as a collaborative effort between physicians and rehabilitation specialists. The evolution of protocol advancement has relied upon feedback from patients, therapists and observable outcomes. Although reports of the first femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgeries were reported in the 1930’s, it was not until recently that more structured, physiologically based guidelines have been developed and executed. Four phases have been developed in this guideline based on functional and healing milestones achieved which allow the patient to progress to the next level of activity. The goal of Phase I, the protective phase, is to progressively regain 75% of full range of motion (ROM) and normalize gait while respecting the healing process. The primary goal of Phase II is for the patient to gain function and independence in daily activities without discomfort. Rehabilitation goals include uncompensated step up/down on an 8 inch box, as well as, adequate pelvic control during low demand exercises. Phase III goals strive to accomplish pain free, non-compensated recreational activities and higher demand work functions. Manual muscle testing (MMT) grading of 5/5 should be achieved for all hip girdle musculature and an ability to dynamically control body weight in space. Phase IV requires the patient be independent with home and gym programs and be asymptomatic and pain free following workouts. Return to running may be commenced at the 12 week mark, but the proceeding requirements must be achieved. Athletes undergoing the procedure may have an accelerated timetable, based on the underlying pathology. Recognizing the patient’s pre-operative health status and post-operative physical demands will direct both the program design and the program timetable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, et al. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–72.PubMedCrossRef Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, et al. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–72.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–20.PubMed Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–20.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Byrd JW, Jones KS. Arthroscopic femoroplasty in the management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:739–46.PubMedCrossRef Byrd JW, Jones KS. Arthroscopic femoroplasty in the management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:739–46.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sussmann PS, Ranawat AS, Lipman J, Lorich DG, Padgett DE, Kelly BT. Arthroscopic versus open osteoplasty of the head-neck junction: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1257–64.PubMedCrossRef Sussmann PS, Ranawat AS, Lipman J, Lorich DG, Padgett DE, Kelly BT. Arthroscopic versus open osteoplasty of the head-neck junction: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1257–64.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, et al. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119–24.PubMedCrossRef Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, et al. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119–24.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Crawford JR, Villar RN. Current concepts in the management of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1459–62.PubMedCrossRef Crawford JR, Villar RN. Current concepts in the management of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1459–62.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference •• Bedi A, Chen N, Robertson W, et al.: The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient. Arthroscopy 2008, 24:1135–45. A systematic review examining the quality of literature looking at outcomes of surgery for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears. Identified were patient satisfaction scores and outcomes for open versus arthroscopic procedures for this hip pathology. The results indicated a 65% to 85% good outcome with the open procedures and 67% to 100% good outcome with the arthroscopic procedures. Regardless of the type of procedure, the failure rate was higher with incidence of osteoarthritis. PubMedCrossRef •• Bedi A, Chen N, Robertson W, et al.: The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient. Arthroscopy 2008, 24:1135–45. A systematic review examining the quality of literature looking at outcomes of surgery for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears. Identified were patient satisfaction scores and outcomes for open versus arthroscopic procedures for this hip pathology. The results indicated a 65% to 85% good outcome with the open procedures and 67% to 100% good outcome with the arthroscopic procedures. Regardless of the type of procedure, the failure rate was higher with incidence of osteoarthritis. PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Logishetty K, Bedi A, Ranawat AS. The role of navigation and robotic surgery in hip arthroscopy. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20:255–63.CrossRef Logishetty K, Bedi A, Ranawat AS. The role of navigation and robotic surgery in hip arthroscopy. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20:255–63.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Heyworth BE, Shindle MK, Voos JE, et al. Radiologic and intraoperative findings in revision hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1295–302.PubMedCrossRef Heyworth BE, Shindle MK, Voos JE, et al. Radiologic and intraoperative findings in revision hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1295–302.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leunig M, Ranawat AS, Ganz R. Surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement. Tech Hip Arthro Joint Pres Surg. 2011;28:228–39.CrossRef Leunig M, Ranawat AS, Ganz R. Surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement. Tech Hip Arthro Joint Pres Surg. 2011;28:228–39.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Griffin KM, Henry CO, Byrd JWT. Rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy. J Sport Rehabil. 2000;9:77–88. Griffin KM, Henry CO, Byrd JWT. Rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy. J Sport Rehabil. 2000;9:77–88.
13.
go back to reference Enseki KR, Martin R, Draovitch P, et al. The hip joint: arthroscopic procedures and postoperative rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:516–25.PubMed Enseki KR, Martin R, Draovitch P, et al. The hip joint: arthroscopic procedures and postoperative rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:516–25.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Stalzer S, Wahoff M, Scanlan M. Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:337–57.PubMedCrossRef Stalzer S, Wahoff M, Scanlan M. Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:337–57.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Singleton SB. Rehabilitation after arthroscopy of an acetabular labral tear. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007;2:241–8.PubMed Singleton SB. Rehabilitation after arthroscopy of an acetabular labral tear. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007;2:241–8.PubMed
16.
go back to reference • Enseki KR, Martin R, Kelly BT: Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Decompression for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Clin Sports Med 2010;29:247–55. A rehabilitation progression following hip arthroscopy is described and broken down into progressions for weight-bearing, range of motion, strength, functional progression and return to sport. PubMedCrossRef • Enseki KR, Martin R, Kelly BT: Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Decompression for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Clin Sports Med 2010;29:247–55. A rehabilitation progression following hip arthroscopy is described and broken down into progressions for weight-bearing, range of motion, strength, functional progression and return to sport. PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Enseki KR, Draovitch P. Rehabilitation for Hip Arthroscopy. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20:278–81.CrossRef Enseki KR, Draovitch P. Rehabilitation for Hip Arthroscopy. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20:278–81.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference • Wahoff M, Ryan M: Rehabilitation after hip femoroacetabular impingement arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med 2011;30:463–82. A non-time based protocol for post-operative rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy surgery is discussed from post-operative day one to return to sport. The author highly encourages the use of passive range of motion circumduction early in the rehabilitation to reduce the risk of scar tissue development. Lying prone two hours/day is also encouraged to inhibit the hip flexors from shortening. PubMedCrossRef • Wahoff M, Ryan M: Rehabilitation after hip femoroacetabular impingement arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med 2011;30:463–82. A non-time based protocol for post-operative rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy surgery is discussed from post-operative day one to return to sport. The author highly encourages the use of passive range of motion circumduction early in the rehabilitation to reduce the risk of scar tissue development. Lying prone two hours/day is also encouraged to inhibit the hip flexors from shortening. PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Prather H, Dugan S, Fitzgerald C, et al. Review of anatomy, evaluation, and treatment of musculoskeletal pelvic floor pain in women. PM R. 2009;1:346–58.PubMedCrossRef Prather H, Dugan S, Fitzgerald C, et al. Review of anatomy, evaluation, and treatment of musculoskeletal pelvic floor pain in women. PM R. 2009;1:346–58.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Green DL, Morris JM. Role of the adductor magnus and adductor longus in postural movements and in ambulation. Am J Phys Med. 1970;49:223–40.PubMed Green DL, Morris JM. Role of the adductor magnus and adductor longus in postural movements and in ambulation. Am J Phys Med. 1970;49:223–40.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Nugent-Derfus GE, Takara T, O’Neill JK, et al. Continuous passive motion applied to whole joints stimulates chondrocyte biosynthesis of PRG4. Osteoarthritis Cart. 2007;15:566–74.CrossRef Nugent-Derfus GE, Takara T, O’Neill JK, et al. Continuous passive motion applied to whole joints stimulates chondrocyte biosynthesis of PRG4. Osteoarthritis Cart. 2007;15:566–74.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Santaguida PL, McGill SM. The psoas major muscle: a three-dimensional geometric study. J Biomech. 1995;28:339–45.PubMedCrossRef Santaguida PL, McGill SM. The psoas major muscle: a three-dimensional geometric study. J Biomech. 1995;28:339–45.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Andersson EA, Oddsson L, Grundstrom H, et al. The role of the psoas and Iliacus muscles for stability and movement of the lumbar spine, pelvis and hip. Scan J Med Sci Sports. 1995;5:10–6.CrossRef Andersson EA, Oddsson L, Grundstrom H, et al. The role of the psoas and Iliacus muscles for stability and movement of the lumbar spine, pelvis and hip. Scan J Med Sci Sports. 1995;5:10–6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cowan SM et al. Delayed onset of transversus abdominus in long-standing groin pain. Med Sci Sports Exer 2004;2040–5. Cowan SM et al. Delayed onset of transversus abdominus in long-standing groin pain. Med Sci Sports Exer 2004;2040–5.
25.
go back to reference Bullock-Saxton JE, Janda V, Bullock M. The influence of ankle sprain injury on muscle activation during hip extension. Int J Sports Med. 1994;15:330–4.PubMedCrossRef Bullock-Saxton JE, Janda V, Bullock M. The influence of ankle sprain injury on muscle activation during hip extension. Int J Sports Med. 1994;15:330–4.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine. 1996;21:2640–50.PubMedCrossRef Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine. 1996;21:2640–50.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb. Phys Ther. 1997;77:132–44.PubMed Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb. Phys Ther. 1997;77:132–44.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Distefano LJ, Blackburn JT, Marshall SW, et al. Gluteal muscle activation during common therapeutic exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:532–40.PubMed Distefano LJ, Blackburn JT, Marshall SW, et al. Gluteal muscle activation during common therapeutic exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:532–40.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Riezebos C, Lagerberg A. Overbelasting (Overuse Dutch). Versus, Tijdschrift voor fysiotherapie. 2000;18:21–60. Riezebos C, Lagerberg A. Overbelasting (Overuse Dutch). Versus, Tijdschrift voor fysiotherapie. 2000;18:21–60.
30.
go back to reference Sahrmann SA. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2002. Sahrmann SA. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2002.
31.
go back to reference Blacburn JT, Reimann BL, Myers JB, et al. Kinematic analysis of the hip and trunk during bilateral stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial support surfaces. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:655–61.CrossRef Blacburn JT, Reimann BL, Myers JB, et al. Kinematic analysis of the hip and trunk during bilateral stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial support surfaces. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:655–61.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kutz MR. Theoretical and practical issues for plyometric training. NCSA PT J. 2003;2:10–2. Kutz MR. Theoretical and practical issues for plyometric training. NCSA PT J. 2003;2:10–2.
33.
go back to reference Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1968–78.PubMedCrossRef Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1968–78.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Handling K, Rylander R: Return to sport field test. University of Delaware, 1985. Handling K, Rylander R: Return to sport field test. University of Delaware, 1985.
35.
go back to reference Myer GD, Schmitt LC, Brent JL, et al. Utilization of modified NFL combine testing to identify functional deficits in athletes following ACL reconstruction. JOSPT. 2011;41:377–88.PubMed Myer GD, Schmitt LC, Brent JL, et al. Utilization of modified NFL combine testing to identify functional deficits in athletes following ACL reconstruction. JOSPT. 2011;41:377–88.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Newton RU, Kraemer WJ. Developing explosive muscular power: implications for a mixed methods training strategy. Strength Cond. 1994;16:20–31. Newton RU, Kraemer WJ. Developing explosive muscular power: implications for a mixed methods training strategy. Strength Cond. 1994;16:20–31.
37.
go back to reference Gambetta V. Athletic development. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishing; 2007. Gambetta V. Athletic development. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishing; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Post-operative guidelines following hip arthroscopy
Authors
Jaime Edelstein
Anil Ranawat
Keelan R. Enseki
Richard J. Yun
Peter Draovitch
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-011-9107-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 1/2012 Go to the issue

Knee Rehabilitation (J Cavanaugh, Section Editor)

Rehabilitation following osteochondral injury to the knee

Hip Rehabilitation (J Edelstein, Section Editor)

Hip resurfacing: not your average hip replacement

Knee Rehabilitation (J Cavanaugh, Section Editor)

Rehabilitation following meniscal repair

Hip Rehabilitation (J Edelstein, Section Editor)

Hip osteoarthritis and the active patient: will I run again?