Top

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Published in:

01-03-2011

Critical review of the current practice for computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement surgery: cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome

Authors: Aravind S. Desai, Asterios Dramis, Daniel Kendoff, Tim N. Board

Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Issue 1/2011

Abstract

In this article, we present a review of the current practice regarding computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement together with the bearing on cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome.

Felson DT. Epidemiology of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Epidemiol Rev. 1998;10:1–28.

Department of Health (available to Health Services Research Collaboration) 2000/01. Hospital Episode Statistics for England and Wales. London: Department of Health; 2001.

Tennant A, Fear J, Pickering A, Hillman M, Cutts A, Chamberlain MA. Prevalence of knee problems in the population aged 55 years and over: identifying the need for knee arthroplasty. BMJ. 1995;310:1291–3.PubMed

Dorr LD, Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;205:5–11.PubMed

Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B, 3rd Cross WW, MacDonald RM, et al. Total knee replacement. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2003;86:1–8.

Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:49–56.PubMedCrossRef

Kluge WH. Computer-assisted knee replacement techniques. Curr Orthop. 2007;21:200–6.CrossRef

Lurin C, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick L, Grifka J. Computer assistance in total knee replacement—a critical assessment of health care technology. Comput Aided Surg. 2006;11:77–80.

Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(Suppl):132–8.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(6):818–23.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1480–2.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Swank M. Computer-assisted surgery—orthopaedic navigation in total joint replacement. US Musculoskelet Dis. 2006;1:85–7.

13.

Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682–7.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Navigated total knee replacement—a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:261–9.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Brophy J. The use of image-free computer-assisted systems in total knee replacement surgeries—a final report. 2007. Available at www.mcgill.ca/tau/. Cited 19 Mar 2007.

16.

Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the 15-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143–9.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830–5.PubMed

18.

Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372–7.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sikorski JM, Chauhan S. Aspects of current management. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:319–23.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomised study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:236–43.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Dong H, Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):191–202.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomised controlled trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:618–26.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Nizard R. Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002;68:215–30.PubMed

Title: Critical review of the current practice for computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement surgery: cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome
Authors: Aravind S. Desai
Asterios Dramis
Daniel Kendoff
Tim N. Board
Publication date: 01-03-2011
Publisher: Humana Press Inc
Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-011-9071-1

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Critical review of the current practice for computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement surgery: cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Shock wave therapy for Achilles tendinopathy

Assessment of scaphoid fracture healing

Erratum to: Localized synovial hypertrophy in the anteromedial compartment of the osteoarthritic knee

Case report: a case review of Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome and low back pain

Erratum to: Painful os intermetatarseum in athletes: a literature review of this condition is presented

Femoroacetabular impingement: a review of diagnosis and management