Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 5/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Predicting Avoidance of Skin Damage Feedback Among College Students

Authors: Laura A. Dwyer, Ph.D., James A. Shepperd, Ph.D., Michelle L. Stock, Ph.D.

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Showing people a personal ultraviolet (UV) photograph depicting skin damage can be an effective method for changing sun protection cognitions and behaviors.

Purpose

We examined whether people opt not to see their UV photograph if given a choice. We also examined predictors of avoidance of skin damage feedback.

Methods

College students (N = 257) completed questionnaires, viewed example UV photographs, and received the opportunity to see a UV photograph of their face.

Results

Over one-third of participants opted not to see their UV photograph. Greater perceived risk of sun damage and having fewer coping resources corresponded with greater avoidance, particularly among participants who reported infrequent sun protection behavior.

Conclusion

The health benefits of UV photography are realized only if people are willing to view the photograph. Our findings suggest the need for interventions that increase receptivity to viewing one’s UV photograph.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Kasparian N, McLoone J, Meiser B. Skin cancer-related prevention and screening behaviors: A review of the literature. J Behav Med. 2009; 32: 406-428.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Fulton JE Jr. Utilizing the ultraviolet (UV detect) camera to enhance the appearance of photodamage and other skin conditions. Dermatol Surg. 1997; 23: 163-169.PubMed
4.
Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Lane DJ, Mahler HI, Kulik JA. Using UV photography to reduce use of tanning booths: A test of cognitive mediation. Health Psychol. 2005; 24: 358-363.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Mahler HI, Kulik JA, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX. Effects of upward and downward social comparison information on the efficacy of an appearance-based sun protection intervention: A randomized, controlled experiment. J Behav Med. 2010; 33: 496-507.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
Stock ML, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, et al. Sun protection intervention for highway workers: Long-term efficacy of UV photography and skin cancer information on men’s protective cognitions and behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 38: 225-236.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
Walsh LA, Stock ML. UV photography, masculinity, and college men’s sun protection cognitions. J Behav Med. 2012; 35: 431-442.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Barbour JB, Rintamaki LS, Ramsey JA, Brashers DE. Avoiding health information. J Health Commun. 2012; 17: 212-229.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Sweeny K, Melnyk D, Miller W, Shepperd JA. Information avoidance: Who, what, when, and why. Rev Gen Psychol. 2010; 14: 340-353.CrossRef
10.
Afifi WA, Weiner JL. Toward a theory of motivated information managaement. Commun Theor. 2004; 14: 167-190.CrossRef
11.
Brashers DE. A theory of communication and uncertainty management. In: Whaley BB, Samter W, eds. Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2007: 201-218.
12.
Mishel MH. Uncertainty in illness. Image: J Nurs Sch. 1988; 20: 225-232.
13.
Persoskie A, Ferrer RA, Klein WM. Association of cancer worry and perceived risk with doctor avoidance: An analysis of information avoidance in a nationally representative US sample. J Behav Med. 2014; 37: 977-987.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Howell JL, Collisson B, Crysel L, et al. Managing the threat of impending implicit attitude feedback. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2013; 4: 714-720.CrossRef
15.
Melnyk D, Shepperd J. Avoiding risk information about breast cancer. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 44: 216-224.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Howell JL, Crosier BS, Shepperd JA. Does lacking threat-management resources increase information avoidance? A multi-sample, multi-method investigation. J Res Pers. 2014; 50: 102-109.CrossRef
17.
Howell JL, Shepperd JA. Reducing information avoidance through affirmation. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23: 141-145.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Harris PR, Napper L. Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information. Pers Soc Psychol B. 2005; 31: 1250-1263.CrossRef
19.
Liberman A, Chaiken S. Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Pers Soc Psychol B. 1992; 18: 669-679.CrossRef
20.
Sherman DK, Cohen GL. The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 38). San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2006: 183–242.
21.
Leffingwell TR, Neumann C, Leedy MJ, Babitzke AC. Defensively biased responding to risk information among alcohol-using college students. Addict Behav. 2007; 32: 158-165.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Sherman DAK, Nelson LD, Steele CM. Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health Messages via self-affirmation. Pers Soc Psychol B. 2000; 26: 1046-1058.CrossRef
23.
van Koningsbruggen GM, Das E, Roskos-Ewoldsen DR. How self-affirmation reduces defensive processing of threatening health information: Evidence at the implicit level. Health Psychol. 2009; 28: 563-568.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1957.
25.
Cooper J, Worchel S. Role of undesired consequences in arousing cognitive dissonance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970; 16: 199-206.CrossRef
26.
27.
Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988; 124: 869-871.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Falk M. Differences in sun exposure habits between self-reported skin type and ultraviolett sensitivity measured by phototest. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2011; 27: 190-195.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Mihalis EL, Wysong A, Boscardin WJ, et al. Factors affecting sunscreen use and sun avoidance in a U.S. national sample of organ transplant recipients. Br J Dermatol. 2013; 168: 346-353.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
Howell JL, Shepperd JA. Establishing a scale measure of information avoidance. Unpublished manuscript.
32.
Isaacowitz DM, Choi Y. Looking, feeling, and doing: Are there age differences in attention, mood, and behavioral responses to skin cancer information? Health Psychol. 2012; 31: 650-659.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
Walsh LA, Stock ML, Peterson LM, Gerrard M. Women’s sun protection cognitions in response to UV photography: The role of age, cognition, and affect. J Behav Med. 2014; 37: 553-563.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Marquardt DW. You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1980; 75: 87-91.
35.
Hayes AF. An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
36.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41: 1149-1160.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Brashers DE. Communication and uncertainaty management. J Commun. 2001; 51: 477-497.CrossRef
38.
Mahler HI. The role of emotions in UV protection intentions and behaviors. Psychol Health Med. 2014; 19: 344-354.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Howell JL, Shepperd JA. Reducing health-information avoidance through contemplation. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24: 1696-1703.CrossRefPubMed
40.
O’Neill SC, Lipkus IM, Sanderson SC, et al. Motivations for genetic testing for lung cancer risk among young smokers. Tob Control. 2013; 22: 406-411.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
41.
Heckman CJ, Wilson DB, Ingersoll KS. The influence of appearance, health, and future orientations on tanning behavior. Am J Health Behav. 2009; 33: 238-243.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
42.
Janssen E, van Osch L, de Vries H, Lechner L. The influence of narrative risk communication on feelings of cancer risk. Br J Health Psychol. 2013; 18: 407-419.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predicting Avoidance of Skin Damage Feedback Among College Students
Authors
Laura A. Dwyer, Ph.D.
James A. Shepperd, Ph.D.
Michelle L. Stock, Ph.D.
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9703-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 5/2015 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

A case for leveraging integrated regulation strategies to optimize health benefits from self-determined exercise behavior

Original Article

Evaluating Approaches for Communication About Genomic Influences on Body Weight

Original Article

Which Images and Features in Graphic Cigarette Warnings Predict Their Perceived Effectiveness? Findings from an Online Survey of Residents in the UK

Erratum

Erratum to: The Strength of Family Ties: Perceptions of Network Relationship Quality and Levels of C-Reactive Proteins in the North Texas Heart Study

Original Article

Husbands’ and Wives’ Physical Activity and Depressive Symptoms: Longitudinal Findings from the Cardiovascular Health Study

Original Article

Can the Affective Response to Exercise Predict Future Motives and Physical Activity Behavior? A Systematic Review of Published Evidence