Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2009

01-12-2009 | Original Article

A Perspective on Eating Behaviors from the Field of Judgment and Decision Making

Author: Ellen Peters, Ph.D.

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Special Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In this commentary, I review a key theme—the construction of preferences—that underlies the psychology of judgment and decision making and may influence eating behaviors. Its central idea is that, in many situations, we do not know what we prefer and, as a result, we construct our preferences “on the spot” based on internal and external cues available at the moment.

Purpose

To understand the extent of construction processes, one has to know both the decision maker (and how he or she draws meaning from information) and the environment she or he faces. I consider possible roles for affect and deliberation in the construction of eating preferences and also examine some existing evidence for two potentially important individual differences—numeracy (number ability) and aging.

Conclusion

Research implications concerning ways to improve eating behaviors are considered.
Literature
1.
Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, eds. The construction of preference. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
2.
3.
Gregory R, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach. J Risk Uncertain. 1993; 7: 177–197.CrossRef
4.
Payne JW, Bettman JR, Schkade DA. Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. J Risk Uncertain. 1999; 19: 243–270.CrossRef
5.
Ditto PH, Hawkins NA. Advance directives and cancer decision making near the end of life. Health Psychol. 2005; 24: S63–70.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough: The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004; 34: 30–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Epstein RM, Peters E. Beyond information: Exploring patients’ preferences. J Am Med Assoc. 2009; 302: 195–197.CrossRef
8.
Wansink B, Painter J, North J. Bottomless bowls: Why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res. 2005; 13: 93–100.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Slovic P. Rejoinder: The perils of viscusi’s analyses of smoking risk perceptions. J Behav Decis Mak. 2000; 13: 273–276.CrossRef
10.
Peters E. The functions of affect in the construction of preferences. In: Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, eds. The construction of preference. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006: 454–463.CrossRef
11.
Dehaene S. The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
12.
Paulos JA. Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York: Hill and Wang; 1988.
13.
Peters E, Dieckmann N, Västfjäll D, Mertz CK, Slovic P, Hibbard J. Bringing meaning to numbers: The impact of evaluative categories on decisions. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009, In press.
14.
Wansink B, Kent RJ, Hoch SJ. An anchoring and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions. J Mark Res. 1998; 35: 71–81.CrossRef
15.
Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol. 1994; 49: 709–724.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Reyna VF. How people make decisions that involve risk: A dual-processes approach. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2004; 13: 60–66.CrossRef
18.
Stanovich KE, West RF. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? In: Gilovich T, Griffin DW, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002: 421–444.
19.
Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol. 2003; 58: 697–720.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Damasio AR. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon; 1994.
21.
Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois; 1957.
22.
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. The affect heuristic. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002: 397–420.
23.
Kahneman D, Schkade D, Sunstein CR. Shared outrage and erratic awards: The psychology of punitive damages. J Risk Uncertain. 1998; 16: 49–86.CrossRef
24.
Schwarz N, Clore GL. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Information and directive functions of affective states. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983; 45: 513–523.CrossRef
25.
Slovic P, Peters E. Risk perception and affect. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006; 15: 322–325.CrossRef
26.
Wilson TD, Dunn DS, Kraft D, Lisle DJ. Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1989; 22: 287–343.CrossRef
27.
Shiv B, Fedorikhin A. Heart and mind in conflict: Interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. J Consum Res. 1999; 26: 278–282.CrossRef
28.
29.
Peters E, Hibbard JH, Slovic P, Dieckmann N. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff. 2007; 26: 741–748.CrossRef
30.
Kutner M, Greenberg E, Baer J. A first look at the literacy of America’s adults in the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office; 2005.
31.
Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001; 21: 37–44.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Peters E. Numeracy and the perception and communication of risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1128: 1–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Rothman RL, Housam R, Weiss H, et al. Patient understanding of food labels: the role of literacy and numeracy. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: 391–398.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Cavanaugh K, Huizinga MM, Wallston KA, et al. Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 737–746.PubMed
35.
Peters E, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Mazzocco K, Dickert S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science. 2006; 17: 407–413.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Huizinga MM, Beech BM, Cavanaugh KL, Elasy TA, Rothman RL. Low numeracy skills are associated with higher BMI. Obesity. 2008; 16: 1966–1968.CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Diehr P, Bild DE, Harris TB, Duxbury A, Siscovick D, Rossi M. Body mass index and mortality in nonsmoking older adults: The cardiovascular health study. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 623–629.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Paquet C, St-Arnaud-McKenzie D, Kergoat M-J, Ferland G, Dubé L. Direct and indirect effects of everyday emotions on food intake of elderly patients in institutions. J Gerontol. 2003; 58A: 153–158.
40.
Salthouse TA. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev. 1996; 103: 403–428.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Peters E, Hess TM, Västfjäll D, Auman C. Adult age differences in dual information processes: implications for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults’ decision making. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007; 2: 1–23.CrossRef
42.
Hibbard JH, Slovic P, Peters E, Finucane ML, Tusler M. Is the informed-choice policy approach appropriate for Medicare beneficiaries? Health Aff. 2001; 20: 199–203.CrossRef
43.
Fung HH, Carstensen LL. Sending memorable messages to the old: Age differences in preferences and memory for emotionally meaningful advertisements. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85: 163–178.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Lockenhoff CE, Carstensen LL. Aging, emotion, and health-related decision strategies: Motivational manipulations can reduce age differences. Psychol Aging. 2007; 22: 134–146.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Hess TM, Waters SJ, Bolstad CA. Motivational and cognitive influences on affective priming in adulthood. J Geront Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000; 55B: 193–204.
46.
Jacoby LL. Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999; 25: 3–22.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Tentori K, Osherson D, Hasher L, May C. Wisdom and aging: irrational preferences in college students but not older adults. Cognition. 2001; 81: 87–96.CrossRef
48.
Kim S, Hasher L. The attraction effect in decision making: superior performance by older adults. Q J Exp Psychol A, Human Exp Psychol. 2005; 58: 120–133.
49.
Johnson MMS, Drungle SC. Purchasing over-the-counter medications: The impact of age differences in information processing. Exp Aging Res. 2000; 26: 245–261.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Stephens EC, Johnson MMS. Dr. Mom and other influences on younger and older adults’ OTC medication purchases. J Appl Gerontol. 2000; 19: 441–459.CrossRef
51.
Hibbard JH, Peters E. Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: Data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003; 24: 413–433.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Wood W, Neal DT. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychol Rev. 2007; 114: 843–863.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2008.
54.
Johnson EJ, Steffel M, Goldstein DG. Making better decisions: From measuring to constructing preferences. Health Psychol. 2005; 24: S17–S22.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Perspective on Eating Behaviors from the Field of Judgment and Decision Making
Author
Ellen Peters, Ph.D.
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue Special Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9121-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2009

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2009 Go to the issue

Original Article

Obesity: Can Behavioral Economics Help?

Introduction

Decision Making in Eating Behavior: Interacting Perspectives from the Individual, Family, and Environment: An Introduction

Original Article

Changing Family Food and Eating Practices: The Family Food Decision-Making System

Original Article

Appetite is a Heritable Phenotype Associated with Adiposity

Original Article

Contributions of the Life Course Perspective to Research on Food Decision Making

Original Article

A Review of Environmental Influences on Food Choices